DIS - Case Record for 97-1111-EL-CSS Skip to main content
      
      
CASE NUMBER: 97-1111-EL-CSS
CASE DESCRIPTION: WINDHAVEN PARTNERS/OHIO EDISON
DOCUMENT SIGNED ON: 4/19/2024
DATE OF SERVICE: ________________________________________
06/09/1999 Entry dismissing this case and closing it of record. (2 pgs.)
06/01/1999 Joint motion to dismiss filed on behalf of applicants by J. Burk, K. Stumphauzer. (2 pgs.)
03/08/1999 Transcript filed for hearing held 2/22/99, (SF), 4 pgs., Con't. (PUCO-Colubus, OH)
02/16/1999 Motion for continuance filed by J. Burke on behalf of Ohio Edison. (5 pgs)
02/12/1999 Motion for continuance filed on behalf of Ohio Edison by J. Burk. (3 pgs)
02/02/1999 Entry scheduling an evidentiary hearing at 10:00 a.m. on February 22, 1999, at the Commission offices; that any party intending to present direct, expert testimony file and serve such upon the other party no later than seven days prior to the commencement of the hearing. (AE) (2 pgs.)
06/10/1998 Transcript filed for hearing held 5/27/98, (SF), 5 pgs., Con't. (PUCO-Columbus, OH)
05/26/1998 Motion for continuance filed on behalf of respondent, Ohio Edison, by J. Burk; and complainant by K. Stumphauzer. (4 pgs.)
05/05/1998 Transcript filed for hearing held 4/21/98, (SF), 5 pgs., Con't. (PUCO-Columbus, OH)
04/17/1998 Motion for continuance filed on behalf of complainant by K. Stumphauzer; and respondent, Oio Edison, by J. Burk. (3 pgs.)
03/02/1998 Entry scheduling a public hearing at 10:00 a.m. on April 21, 1998, at the Commission offices; that any party intend- ing to present direct, expert testimony file and serve such in compliance with Rule 4901-1-29, O.A.C.; that OE is dir- ected to reconnect service to Windhaven as quickly as pos- sible. (AE) (3 pgs.)
12/19/1997 Entry ordering that OE's motion to dismiss the complaint is denied; that reasonable grounds for complaint have been stated; scheduling a settlement conference at 1:30 p.m. on January 20, 1998, at the Commission offices. (AE) (4 pgs.)
12/04/1997 Reply to complainant's brief in opposition to motion to dismiss of Ohio Edison, filed on behalf of respondent, Ohio Edison, by J. Burk. (7 pgs.)
11/24/1997 Letter confirming that Kenneth S. Stumphauzer, attorney for complainant, consented to a fourteen day extension to reply to complainant's response to Ohio Edison's motion to dis- miss, filed on behalf of respondent, Ohio Edison, by J. Burk. (1 pg.)
11/10/1997 Brief in opposition to motion to dismiss of respondent, Ohio Edison, filed on behalf of complainant by K. Stump- hauzer. (7 pgs.)
10/31/1997 Letter stating that James W. Burk, attorney for respondent, consented to a 14 day extension to respond to the motion to dismiss filed by respondent, filed by K. Stumphauzer. (1 pg.)
10/10/1997 Answer and motion to dismiss of Ohio Edison Company filed by J. Burk. (7 pgs.)
09/22/1997 Complaint letter and copy of complaint mailed to: Ohio Edison, office of the president. (Akron, Ohio) (1 pg.)
09/22/1997 Complaint letter and copy of complaint mailed to: Ohio Edison, office of the president. (Lorain, Ohio) (1 pg.)
09/19/1997 In the matter of the complaint of Windhaven Partners dba Windhaven Apartments (vs) Ohio Edison Company relative to the alleged unjust and unlawful billing for electric ser- vice. (6 pgs.)