Skip to main content
      
      
CASE NUMBER: 96-0996-TP-CSS
CASE DESCRIPTION: ROBERT WOODMAN/AMERITECH OHIO
DOCUMENT SIGNED ON: 3/3/2021
DATE OF SERVICE: ________________________________________
10/17/1996 Motion to dismiss and memorandum in support filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by M. Mulcahy. (4 pgs.)
10/17/1996 Entry dismissing this complaint and closing the case of record. (4 pgs.)
09/26/1996 Entry ordering that Mr. Woodman shall file by 10/3/96 verified information indicating whether and, if so, how he holds the requisite legal authority, either as an Ohio-licensed attorney or otherwise, to represent before this Commission in this case, the legal interests of DAS, or any other unit of state government listed in the com- plaint; if, in fact, Mr. Woodman is not an Ohio-licensed attorney, the verified information submitted must be in the form of a non-attorney representation request which would meet the requirements of Rule 4901-1-08(B),O.A.C., signed by a duly authorized representative of DAS and/or any state governmental unit on whose behalf the complaint has been brought. (AE) 4 pgs.)
09/23/1996 Additional information filed on behalf of complainant by R. Woodman. (15 pgs.) (FILED 9/20/96)
09/18/1996 Complaint letter and copy of complaint mailed to: Jon F. Kelly, Ameritech Ohio. (1 pg.)
09/16/1996 In the matter of the complaint of Robert P. Woodman on behalf of OHIODAS (vs) Ameritech Ohio relative to the alleged unjust and unreasonable charges for local exchange telephone services. (8 pgs.)
01/09/1995 Testimony of David Effron filed on behalf of OCC.