DIS - Case Record for 96-0532-TP-UNC Skip to main content
      
      
CASE NUMBER: 96-0532-TP-UNC
CASE DESCRIPTION: SENATE BILL 306/HOUSE BILL 734
DOCUMENT SIGNED ON: 4/19/2024
DATE OF SERVICE: ________________________________________
08/25/2009 Confidential Release: Rebuttal testimony of James D. Webber filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by B. Kahn filed on July 22, 1997.
11/29/1998 Application for rehearing and memorandum in support filed on behalf of MCI Telecommunications Corp. by J. Sanders.
04/28/1998 Letter requesting assistance from the Commission staff in securing a commitment for payment from the dafaulting carriers, filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by J. Kelly. (8 pgs.)
02/12/1998 Entry ordering that the application for rehearing by Ameritech and MCI are denied, that Ameritech comply with Finding (7).
02/12/1998 Entry denying the applications for rehearing filed by Ameri- tech and MCI. (7 pgs.)
02/09/1998 Joint memorandum contra to Ameritech Ohio's application for rehearing, filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by B. Kahn and MCI Telecommunications Corp. by J. Sanders.
02/09/1998 Memorandum contra of MCI's application for rehearing, filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by J. Kelly.
02/09/1998 Joint memorandum contra to Ameritech Ohio's application for rehearing, filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by B. Kahn; and MCI Telecommunications Corp. by J. Sanders. (16 pgs.)
02/09/1998 Memorandum contra MCI's application for rehearing, filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by J. Kelly. (15 pgs.)
01/30/1998 Application for rehearing, filed on behalf of MCI Telecommunications Corp. by J. Sanders.
01/29/1998 Application for rehearing filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by J. Kelly. (20 pgs.)
01/29/1998 Application for rehearing and memorandum in support filed on behalf of MCI Telecommunications Corp. by J. Sanders and M. Berns. (10 pgs.)
01/29/1998 Application for rehearing filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by J. Kelly. (20 pgs.)
12/30/1997 Finding and Order that consistent with Findings (14) and (15), Ameritech Ohio is required to refund to each individual IXC 50 percent of the intrastate set use fee charges collected from that particular IXC by Ameritech Ohio for the time period from Sept. 1, 1996 through April 14, 1997.
12/30/1997 Finding & Order that, consistent with Findings 14 and 15, Ameritech Ohio is required to refund to each individual IXC 50 percent of the intrastate set use fee charges col- lected from that particular IXC by Ameritech Ohio for the time period from September 1, 1996 through April 14, 1997. (8 pgs.)
10/30/1997 Update to service list filed on behalf of AT&T Communica- tions of Ohio by J. Troup. (1 pg.)
07/22/1997 Rebuttal testimony of Cathleen M. Conway filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by B. Kahn. (22 pgs.)
07/22/1997 Rebuttal testimony of James D. Webber filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by B. Kahn. (19 pgs.)
07/11/1997 Letter stating that the PUCO staff intends to participate in this case but does not intend to present testimony at this time filed by S. Reilly. (1 pg.)
06/27/1997 Direct testimony of Cathleen m. Conway filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by B. Kahn. (30 pgs.)
06/27/1997 Direct testimony of James D. Webber filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by B. Kahn. (16 pgs.)
04/29/1997 Ameritech Ohio's supplement filed by J. Kelly. (3 pgs.)
04/29/1997 Ameritech Ohio's supplement filed by J. Kelly.
03/27/1997 Entry ordering that Ameritech's motion to dismiss the com- plaint in 96-336 is denied; that reasonable grounds for com- plaint have been stated in 96-336; that OCC's motion to intervene in 96-336 is granted; that AT&T's request to ex- tend the time in which the Commission will adjudicate the issues in 96-336 is granted; that a precudural prehearing conference be held in 96-336 at 10:00 a.m. on May 16, 1997, at the Commission offices. (4 pgs.)
03/11/1997 Notice of withdrawal of counsel filed by R. Rosenberry.
03/11/1997 Notice of withdrawal of counsel filed by R. Rosenberry. (2 pgs.)
02/12/1997 Letter requesting that the Commission modify its date for decision in the AT&T case from no later than March 31, 1997, to August 31, 1997, filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by W. Newcomb, Jr. (2 pgs.)
10/01/1996 Ameritech Ohio's reply filed by J. Kelly.
10/01/1996 Ameritech Ohio's reply filed by J. Kelly. (14 pgs.)
09/26/1996 Response filed on behalf of MCI Telecommunications Corp. by J. Sanders and D. Townsley. (9 pgs.)
09/26/1996 Letter in response to the Attorney Examiner's entry request- ing information in regard to the Ameritech pay telephone set use fee and the Ameritech settlement requirement to reduce the CCLC, filed on behalf of OCC by F. Darr. (2 pgs.)
09/26/1996 Comments responding to Ameritech Ohio's letter of September 18, 1996, filed on behalf of AT&T Communications by S. How- ard. (23 pgs.)
09/26/1996 Response filed on behalf of MCI Telecommunications Corp. by J. Sanders and D. Townsley.
09/26/1996 Comments responding to Ameritech Ohio's letter of September 18, 1996, filed on behalf of AT&T Communications by S. Howard.
09/20/1996 Entry ordering that interested persons are invited to file pleadings responding to Ameritech's September 18, 1996 letter by 9/26/96; Ameritech may file a reply by 10/1/96. (AE) (2 pgs.) (ISSUED 9/19/96)
09/19/1996 Entry ordering that interested persons are invited to file pleadings responding to Ameritech's September 18, 1996 letter by 9/26/96; Ameritech may file a reply by 10/1/96. (AE)
09/18/1996 Follow-up letter to the discussion that took place at the Commission meeting on September 4, 1996, filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by J. Kelly. (13 pgs.)
09/05/1996 Entry ordering that Ameritech tariff PUCO No. 20 is approved effective September 1, 1996. (3 pgs.)
09/05/1996 Entry ordering that Ameritech Tariff PUCO No. 20 is approved effective Sept. 1, 1996.
08/30/1996 Reply to the memorandum contra of Ameritech Ohio, filed on behalf of MCI Telecommunications Corp. by J. Saners. (20 pgs.)
06/28/1996 Withdrawal of its objections to Ameritech Ohio's filings, filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio, Inc. by B. Kahn.
06/28/1996 Withdrawal of its objections to Ameritech Ohio's filings, filed on behalf of AT&T Communications by B. Kahn. (6 pgs.)
06/20/1996 Entry ordering that the supplemental agreements submitted on May 20, 1996, by Ameritech Ohio, the Ohio Dept. of Dev., and the staff of the Commission is adopted.
05/22/1996 Settlement agreement filed on behalf of the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio (the Commission of Ohio or PUCO) Ameritech Ohio, Time Warner AXS of Ohio, L.P. and Time Warner Communications of Ohio, L.P. (Time Warner) OCC, AT&T Communications of Ohio, Inc., Sprint, MCI and the Ohio Cable Telecommunications Association filed by E. Kozelek.
05/21/1996 In the matter of the implementation of Senate Bill 306 or House Bill 734 of the 121st General Assembly. (1 pg.)