Skip to main content
      
      
CASE NUMBER: 96-0506-TP-CSS
CASE DESCRIPTION: JAMES WOODMAN (SHKRHTS)/AMERITECH
DOCUMENT SIGNED ON: 10/24/2020
DATE OF SERVICE: ________________________________________
09/26/1996 Entry dismissing this complaint case. (11 pgs.)
09/19/1996 Motion to dismiss and memorandum in support filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by M. Mulcahy. (8 pgs.)
09/12/1996 Motion to amend, motion to strike, and motion to rescind and memorandum in support filed on behalf of complainant by J. Woodman. (7 pgs.)
09/06/1996 Entry ordering that Mr. Woodman and the trustees of WeShare Inc. shall file by 9/13/96 a verified statement indicating whether and, if so, how they hold the requisite legal authority, either as Ohio licensed attorneys or otherwise, to represent the interests of those persons or entities on whose respective behalf they have filed compaints; if, in fact, neither Mr. Woodman nor any of the trustees of WeShare Inc. is an Ohi-licensed attorney, the verified statement submitted must be in the form of a signed non-attorney representation request by the actual person or entity on whose behalf the respective complaint has been brought; that for an indefinite period until further notice is given in a subsequent entry, the deadline is suspended for Ameri- tech to file any responsive pleadings not already submitted either now or in the future brought by Mr. Woodman or the trustees of WeShare Inc. on behalf of persons or entities other than themselves. (AE) (9 pgs.)
06/11/1996 Answer filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by M. Mulcahy. (4 pgs.)
06/11/1996 Motion to dismiss and memorandum in support filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by M. Mulcahy. (12 pgs.)
05/22/1996 Complaint letter and copy of complaint mailed to: Jon F. Kelly, Ameritech Ohio. (1 pg.)
05/21/1996 In the matter of the complaint of James P. Woodman on behalf of the City of Shaker Heights, Ohio (vs) Ameritech Ohio relative to the alleged unreasonable and unjust charges for telephone service. (5 pgs.)