| Date Filed | Summary | Pages |
| 06/18/1998 | Second entry on rehearing that the contract filing policy first adopted in the April 30, 1998 entry on rehearing is clarified in accordance with this entry; that the OTIA's motion for leave to file an application for rehearing instanter and its application for rehearing, Ameritech Ohio's application for rehearing, and AT&T's memorandum contra Ameritech Ohio's application for rehearing are moot; that this case be closed of record. (7 pgs.) | 7 |
| 06/11/1998 | AT&T's motion for leave to intervene and memorandum in support, and file its memorandum contra to Ameritech's application for rehearing instanter, filed by B. Kahn. (5 pgs.) | 5 |
| 06/11/1998 | AT&T's memorandum contra to Ameritech Ohio's application for rehearing, filed by B. Kahn. (5 pgs.) | 5 |
| 06/01/1998 | Application for rehearing filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by J. Lang. (7 pgs.) | 7 |
| 05/29/1998 | Application for Rehearing of the Ohio Telecommunications Industry Association. Submitted by: T. Lodge. (7 pgs.) | 7 |
| 05/29/1998 | Motion & Memorandum in support of Motion of the Ohio Tele- communications Industry Assoc. for Leave to File Application for Rehearing Instanter. Submitted by: T. Lodge. (4 pgs.) | 4 |
| 04/30/1998 | Entry granting Ameritech's application for rehearing; that the Docketing Division continue to treat the information filed under seal as protected material until December 31, 2002, unless otherwise ordered by the Commission. (9 pgs.) | 9 |
| 04/09/1998 | Entry ordering that rehearing is granted for the limited purpose of affording the Commission additional time to consider the arguments raised on rehearing. (5 pgs.) | 5 |
| 03/26/1998 | Joint memorandum contra Ameritech Ohio's application for rehearing, filed on behalf of Time Warner Communications by M. Schermer and Nextlink Ohio by D. Clayton. (7 pgs.) | 7 |
| 03/16/1998 | Application for rehearing and memorandum in support filed on behalf of applicant by J. Lang. (30 pgs.) | 30 |
| 02/12/1998 | Entry ordering that Ameritech's request for protective treatment of the redacted information is denied; that the Docketing Division is directed to release into the public record all documents filed under seal in these cases pur- suant to the directions given in Finding 12; that Ameri- tech's motions seeking to extend protective treatment to the contracts set forth in Finding 10 are denied; that the Commission's rulings in this entry do not affect the sus- pension of the contracts set forth in Finding 13. (10 pgs.) | 10 |
| 09/08/1997 | Motion to extend protective order filed on behalf of appli- cant by J. Kelly. (2 pgs.) | 2 |
| 08/15/1996 | Memo, notice of automatic approval of application and notice to hold case open in order to rule on the motion for pro- tective order associated with the case filed by H. Mion, PUCO staff. (1 pg.) | 1 |
| 06/28/1996 | Withdrawal of its objections to Ameritech Ohio's filings, filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio, Inc. by B. Kahn. | 6 |
| 06/28/1996 | Withdrawal of its objections to Ameritech Ohio's filings, filed on behalf of AT&T Communications by B. Kahn. (6 pgs.) | 6 |
| 05/16/1996 | Reply to AT&T's and Time Warner's memoranda contra motion for protective order and AT&T's supplemental objections, filed on behalf of applicant by J. Kelly. (8 pgs.) | 8 |
| 05/16/1996 | Reply to AT&T's and Time Warner's memoranda contra motion for protective order and AT&T's supplemental objections, filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by J. Kelly. | 9 |
| 05/15/1996 | Reply to Ameritech Ohio's response and supplemental response and continuing objections to Ameritech Ohio filings, filed on behalf of AT&T by B. Kahn. (10 pgs.) (FILED 5/10/96) | 10 |
| 05/10/1996 | Memorandum contra Ameritech Ohio's motion for protective order, filed on behalf of Time Warner AxS by D. Clayton. | 10 |
| 05/10/1996 | Time Warner AxS' memorandum contra Ameritech Ohio's motions for protective order filed by D. Clayton, M. Schermer. (10 pgs.) | 10 |
| 05/06/1996 | Supplemental objections, request for clarification and memorandum contra filed on behalf of AT&T by B. Kahn. (14 pgs.) | 14 |
| 04/22/1996 | Agreement for Sonet Ring Network Service between NewPar dba Cellular One and Ameritech filed by P.J. Flynt, C. Vannett. (13 pgs.) (filed under seal) | 13 |
| 04/22/1996 | Ameritech Ohio's motion for protective order filed by J. Kelly. (6 pgs.) | 6 |
| 04/22/1996 | In the mattger of the application of Ameritech Ohio for approval of a Contract between itself and New Par dba Cellular One. (14 pgs.) | 6 |