DIS - Case Record for 96-0066-TP-CSS Skip to main content

Case Record For:

96-0066-TP-CSS

File a Public Comment
Case Title: TIME WARNER AXS/AMERITECH OHIO
Status: CL-CLOSED
Industry Code: TP-TELEPHONE
Purpose Code: CSS-Complaint on service or safety
Date Opened: 1/22/1996
Date Closed: 7/1/1996
Printable Docket Card Service List
View per page
Date FiledSummaryPages
08/25/2009Confidential Release: Unredacted version of memorandum contra Ameritech Ohio's motion to dismiss, filed on behalf of complainant by R. Rosenberry filed on February 6, 1996.15
08/25/2009Confidential Release: Motion to dismiss and memorandum in support filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by M. Mulcahy filed on February 2, 1996.19
08/25/2009Confidential Release: Major issues filed on behalf of Time Warner Communications or Ohio, L.P. and Time Warner AxS by S. Randazzo filed on February 2, 1996.4
01/09/1997Supplemental Finding & Order that the bilateral agreement submitted on October 10, 1996, is approved in accordance with the provisions of this Order; that any standards or interfaces established by the committee shall be docketed in this case on a going forward basis; that no changes in the proposed agreement shall occur without Commission appro- val; that no assignment or transfer of the rights and re- sponsibilities provided under this agreement shall occur without Commission approval; that the parties are relieved of the prior requirement to provide biweekly updates on the status of the contract negotiations. (4 pgs.)4
10/30/1996Supplemental opinion and order, ordering that the arrangement submitted on July 12, 1996, as amended on July 31, 1996, is approved.7
10/10/1996Bilateral agreement filed on behalf of Time Warner by S. Randazzo and Ameritech Ohio by M. Mulcahy. (7 pgs.)7
08/01/1996Supplemental Finding & Order that the arrangement submitted on July 12, 1996, as amended on July 30, 1996 and July 31, 1996, is approved, in accordance with the provisions of this order; that the subsequent bilateral agreement between the parties should be submitted to the Commission for approval upon execution; that the tariff sheets submitted by Ameri- tech in this case are moot. (7 pgs.)7
07/31/1996Response filed on behalf Ameritech Ohio by M. Mulcahy and Time Warner by S. Randazzo. (2 pgs.)2
07/30/1996Revised pages 1, 14, 31, 40 and 3 of schedule 3.0 of the interconnection agreement between Ameritech Ohio and Time Warner Communications of Ohio, L.P. filed on behalf of applicant by M. Mulcahy, S. Randazzo. (10 pgs.)10
07/24/1996Reply comments filed on behalf of Time Warner Communications of Ohio by S. Randazzo. (6 pgs.)6
07/24/1996Reply comments filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by M. Mulcahy. (8 pgs.)8
07/19/1996Comments filed on behalf of the City of Columbus by R. O'Brien, J. Klein, III, and G. Dunn.5
07/19/1996Comments filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by B. Kahn.5
07/19/1996Comments filed on behalf of Sprint Communications Co. L.P. by M. Jenkins.13
07/19/1996Comments filed on behalf of OCC by A. Kelsey.7
07/19/1996Comments filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by B. Kahn. (5 pgs.)5
07/19/1996Comments filed on behalf of the City of Columbus by R. O'Brien, J. Klein, III, and G. Dunn. (5 pgs.)5
07/19/1996Comments filed on behalf of MCI Telecommunications Corp. by D. Townsley and J. Sanders. (9 pgs.)9
07/19/1996Comments filed on behalf of OCC by A. Kelsey. (7 pgs.)7
07/19/1996Comments filed on behalf of Sprint Communications Company L.P. by M. Jenkins. (13 pgs.)13
07/19/1996Comments of MCI Telecommunications Corporation filed by D. Townsley.9
07/18/1996Comments filed on behalf of TCG Cleveland by B. Weston.4
07/18/1996Comments filed on behalf of TCG Cleveland by B. Weston. (4 pgs.)4
07/12/1996Entry ordered that all interest persons or entities who wish to file comments in this docket must do so on or before July 19, 1996, that Ameritech Ohio and Time Warner may file reply comments no later that July 24, 1996.(MF)9
07/12/1996Entry ordering that all interested persons or entities who wish to file comments in this docket must do so by noon on July 19, 1996; that Ameritech Ohio and Time Warner may file reply comments no later than July 24, 1996. (AE) (4 pgs.)4
07/12/1996Regional interconnection arrangement filed on behalf of Time Warner by S. Randazzo, and Ameritech Ohio by M. Mul- cahy. (86 pgs.)86
07/12/1996Approval of the interconnection arrangement between Time Warner Communication and Ameritech Ohio. 86
07/12/1996Regional interconnection arrangement between Time Warner Communications and Ameritech Ohio.2
07/01/1996Letter requesting a continuance, that will permit the parties to produce a voluntary interconnection arrangement, filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio, by M. Mulcahy and Time Warner Communications of Ohio, by S. Randazzo.1
07/01/1996Letter requesting that the Commission grant a continuance that will permit the parties to continue to focus attention of their efforts to produce a voluntary interconnection arrangement, and that they extend the July 1, 1996 filing date specified in their entry of June 25, 1996 until noon July 12, 1996, filed on behalf of Time Warner by S. Ran- dazzo, and Ameritech Ohio by M. Mulcahy. (1 pg.)1
07/01/1996Entry granting the joint request of the parties that addi- tional time be granted until noon on July 12, 1996, in order that the payties may continue to negotiate the terms of an interconnection agreement. (AE) (1 pg.)1
07/01/1996Entry ordered that the joint request of the parties is granted. (MF)1
06/25/1996Entry ordering that the parties file either their negotiated interconnection agreement or their respective final comprehensive proposals by July 1, 1996. (MKF)7
05/28/1996Memorandum contra Time Warner's objections to May 15, 1996 tariff filing, filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by M. Mulcahy. (16 pgs.)16
05/22/1996Objections of Time Warner AXS of Ohio, L.P. and Time Warner Communications of Ohio, L.P. to Ameritech Ohio tariff filed May 15, 1996, filed by R. Rosenberry.31
05/22/1996Transcript filed for hearing held 5/15/96, (CG) (RF) (DJ) (RF) (JA), 117 pgs., Submitted.117
05/22/1996Objections to Ameritech Ohio tariff filed May 15, 1996, filed on behalf of complainants by S. Randazzo and M. Schermer. (31 pgs.)31
05/15/1996Entry granting the applications for rehearing for the limited purpose of allowing the Commission additional time in which to consider the issues raised by Ameritech and Time Warner.7
05/15/1996Tariff, PUCO No. 20, Part 1, Section 2, original sheet 4; Section 3, 2nd sheet 9, 2nd sheet 13; Part 7, Section 4, 1st sheet 1, original sheets 3 & 4; Part 22, original sheet 1; Part 23, Section 1, original sheets 1, 2, and 3; filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by R. Hillstrom.12
05/14/1996Exceptions to alternative dispute resolution team report filed on behalf of Time Warner AXS of Ohio and Time Warner Communications of Ohio by S. R. Rosenberry and M. Schermer.19
05/14/1996Exceptions to the Commission Staff's alternative resolution team report and request for hearing, filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by M. Mulcahy. (22 pgs.)22
05/09/1996Entry scheduling a hearing on 5/15/96 following the Commis- sion's scheduled consideration of cases for that agenda. (AE) (2 pgs.)2
05/07/1996Alternative dispute resolution team report filed on behalf of the PUCO staff.15
04/30/1996Memorandum contra Ameritech Ohio's application for rehearing filed on behalf of Time Warner AxS of Ohio, L.P. and Time Warner Communications of Ohio, L.P. by D. Clayton and M. Schermer. (20 pgs.) (FILED 4/29/96)20
04/29/1996Time Warner AXS of Ohio, L.P. and Time Warner Communications of Ohio, L.P.'S memorandum contra Ameritech Ohio's application for rehearing filed by D. Clayton.20
04/29/1996Memorandum contra Time Warner's application for rehearing, filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by M. Mulcahy.14
04/26/1996Resolution No. 3-96 filed on behalf of City of Upper Arlington.2
04/19/1996Application for rehearing and memorandum in support filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by M. Mulcahy.21
04/19/1996Application for rehearing of Time Warner AxS of Ohio, L.P. and Time Warner Communications of Ohio, L.P. filed by S. Randazzo.11
04/19/1996Application for rehearing and memorandum in support filed on behalf of complainant by R. Rosenberry. (11 pgs.)11
04/18/1996Resolution filed on behalf of Dublin City Council by Mayor C. Kranstuber. (2 pgs.)2
04/17/1996Letter withdrawing tariffs filed on April 5, 1996, filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by R. Hillstrom. (1 pg.)1
04/17/1996Letter withdrawing tariffs, filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by R. Hillstrom.1
04/12/1996Entry ordering that the parties comply with the directives set forth in this entry. (MKF)8
04/10/1996Additional information filed on behalf of complainant by D. Clayton and M. Schermer. (1 pg.)1
04/10/1996Letter regarding the interconnection tariff filed on behalf of Time Warner Communications, M. Schermer.1
04/05/1996Tariffs filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by R. Hillstrom.29
04/05/1996Tariff, PUCO No. 20, in compliance with the Commission's order in this case, filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by R. Hillstrom. (29 pgs.)29
03/29/1996Resolution No. 3-96 filed on behalf of the City of Upper Arlington.2
03/28/1996Entry ordering that the application for rehearing of the Commission's February 22, 1996 entry filed by MCI Metro Access Transmission Services, MFS Communications Co., and TCG Cleveland is moot.8
03/22/1996Service Notice.5
03/21/1996Opinion and order ordering that Ameritech file tariffs consistent with the order within 15 days.11
03/21/1996Opinion and Order ordering Ameritech to file tariffs consistent with the order within 15 days. (11 pgs.)11
03/20/1996Tariffs filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by M. Mulcahy.11
03/19/1996Motion to invoke emergency authority and memorandum in support , filed on behalf of The City of Columbus by R. O'Brien, J. Klein and J. Bentine.8
03/19/1996Correction filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by M. Mulcahy.1
03/15/1996Proof of publication filed.1
03/13/1996Proof of publication filed. (Auglaize County)1
03/12/1996Proof of publication - Portsmouth Daily Times-Scioto County.2
03/12/1996Final statement of position of Time Warner Communications of Ohio, L.P. by S. Randazzo.16
03/12/1996Notice of most recent offer, filed on behalf of respondent Ameritech Ohio by K. Sullivan and M. Mulcahy.8
03/12/1996Service Notice.4
03/12/1996Notice of most recent offer filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by M. Mulcahy and K. Sullivan. (8 pgs.)8
03/12/1996Final statement of position filed on behalf of complainant by S. Randazzo. (16 pgs.)16
03/12/1996Proof of Publication filed. (1 pg.) (Scioto County)1
03/11/1996Entry ordering that the parties have until the end of the day, March 12, 1996, in which to file an agreement or their last best offers. (AE) (1 pg.)1
03/08/1996Correspondence letter regarding the complaint, filed by R. Matthews.2
03/07/1996Proof of publication filed. (Marion County)1
03/07/1996Transcript filed for hearing held 3/1/96, (JB), 103 pgs., Submitted. (Volume II) (PUCO-Columbus, OH)103
03/07/1996Transcript filed for hearing held 2/29/96, (CG), 148 pgs., Continued. (Volume I) (PUCO-Columbus, OH)148
03/04/1996Proof of publication filed. (Stark County)1
02/29/1996Amicus brief filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by W. Newcomb, Jr.14
02/28/1996Amicus brief filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by R. Quinn, Jr.13
02/28/1996Prehearing brief filed on behalf of Time Warner Communications of Ohio by S. Randazzo.31
02/28/1996Brief amicus curiae filed on behalf of OCC by K. Hardie.17
02/28/1996Amicus brief of AT&T Communications of Ohio Inc. filed by R. Quinn Jr. 13
02/28/1996Letter to Commission stating position of the IEU-Ohio as it relates to this proceeding, filed by M. Swansiger.2
02/28/1996Recommendation on unresolved issues between Ameritech Ohio and Time Warner Communciations of Ohio, L.P. by the Cities of Columbus, Delaware Dublin, Upper Arlington, and the Village of Powell by R. O'Brien and J. Klein.10
02/28/1996Motion to intervene and memorandum in support filed on behalf of City of Columbus by R. O'Brien and J. Klein and J. Bentine; Cities of Delaware, Dublin, Upper Arlington, and the Village of Powell by G. Dunn; and the City of Upper Arlington by S. Hunter Pfancuff.21
02/28/1996Joint motion for leave to file an application for rehearing, memorandum in support, filed on behalf of MCI Metro Access Transmission by D. Townsley and J. Sanders; MFS Communications by M. Albert; and TCG Cleveland by D. Trabaris.24
02/28/1996Amicus curiae brief filed on behalf of The Ohio Cable Telecommunications Assoc. by D. Clayton.3
02/28/1996Brief amicus curiae filed on behalf of OCC by D. Bergmann. (20 pgs.)20
02/28/1996Prehearing brief filed on behalf of Time Warner Communica- tions of Ohio by S. Randazzo. (31 pgs.)31
02/28/1996Prehearing brief of Time Warner Communications of Ohio, L.P. by S. Randazzo.31
02/26/1996Proof of publication filed. (Franklin County)1
02/26/1996Proof of publication filed. (Wayne County)1
02/23/1996Proof of publication filed. (Jackson County)1
02/23/1996Proof of Publication filed. (1 pg.) (Clermont County)1
02/22/1996Entry ordering that the parties are to comply with the directives of this entry.10
02/22/1996Proof of publication filed. (Brown County)1
02/21/1996Entry ordering that Ameritech's motion to strike and, in the alternative, leave to file a response is denied; that Time Warner's request for shortening the time frame for discovery is granted. (AE)4
02/21/1996Proof of publication filed. (Tuscarawas County)1
02/21/1996Staff evaluation of unresolved issues between Ameritech Ohio and Time Warner Communications of Ohio, filed on behalf of the PUCO staff.37
02/20/1996Reply memorandum filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by M. Mulcahy.4
02/20/1996Proof of publication filed (Hardin County)1
02/20/1996Proof of publication filed (Champaign County)1
02/20/1996Reply to memorandum contra motion for clarification and guidance, request for expedited ruling and for other relief filed on behalf of Time Warner by S. Randazzo.10
02/20/1996Proof of publication filed. (Warren County)1
02/16/1996Proof of publication filed. (Adams County)2
02/16/1996Motion to shorten time period for responses to discovery, filed on behalf of Time Warner by D. Clayton.12
02/16/1996Proof of publication filed (Darke County)1
02/16/1996Proof of publication filed (Greene County)1
02/16/1996Proof of publication filed (Allen County)1
02/16/1996Memorandum contra motion for clarification and guidance, filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by M. Mulcahy.10
02/16/1996Proof of publication filed. (Medina County)1
02/15/1996Entry ordering that Time Warners application for rehearing is denied.5
02/15/1996Proof of publication filed (Miami County)1
02/15/1996Entry ordering that Time Warner's application for rehearing is denied.3
02/15/1996Proof of publication filed. (Delaware County)1
02/14/1996Proof of publication filed (Logan County)1
02/14/1996Proof of publication filed. (Mercer County)1
02/13/1996Memorandum contra motion to strike filed on behalf Time Warner by S. Randazzo.4
02/12/1996Motion for clarification and guidance, request for expedited ruling and for other relief, filed on behalf of Time Warner Communications of Ohio, Inc., by S. Randazzo.23
02/09/1996Legal Notices sent to: (37 Counties) by Fax.0
02/08/1996Motion to strike and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by M. Mulcahy.7
02/08/1996Memorandum contra Time Warners application for rehearing filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by M. Mulcahy.9
02/08/1996Service Notice filed.2
02/08/1996Entry ordering that reasonable grounds for complaint have been stated by Time Warner; that Ameritech's motion to dismiss the complaint is denied; that the motion to inter- vene of MFS is denied; scheduling this matter for discussion at 1:30 p.m. on 2/29/96 at the Commission offices. (5 pgs.)5
02/06/1996Redacted Version Memorandum contra Ameritech Ohio's motion to dismiss, filed on behalf of Time Warner Communications of Ohio, L.P. and Time Warner AxS' by R. Rosenberry14
02/06/1996Unredacted version of memorandum contra Ameritech Ohio's motion to dismiss, filed on behalf of complainant by R. Rosenberry. (14 pgs.) (FILED UNDER SEAL)14
02/02/1996Answer filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by M. Mulcahy.6
02/02/1996Motion to intervene and memorandum in support filed on behalf of MFS Internet of Ohio, Inc., by K. Kinkopf.5
02/02/1996Statement regarding issues in dispute filed on behalf of Time Warner Communications of Ohio, L.P. and Time Warner AxS by S. Randazzo.20
02/02/1996Letter to the Commission regarding issues list, filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by M. Mulcahy.1
02/02/1996Redacted version of Ameritech Ohio's Motion to dismiss and memorandum in support filed by J. Kelly.18
02/02/1996Major issues list filed on behalf of Time Warner Communi- cations or Ohio, L.P. and Time Warner AxS by S. Randazzo. (2 pgs.) (FILED UNDER SEAL)2
02/02/1996Motion to dismiss and memorandum in support filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by M. Mulcahy. (17 pgs.) (FILED UNDER SEAL)17
02/02/1996Statement regarding issues in dispute filed on behalf of Time Warner Communications of Ohio, L.P. and Time Warner AxS by S. Randazzo. (16 pgs.)16
01/29/1996In the matter of the complaint of Time Warner AxS of Ohio, L.P and Time Warner Communications of Ohio, L.P. vs Ameritech Ohio relative to the alleged unjust and unreasonable rates and charges.12
01/29/1996Application for rehearing filed on behalf of Time Warner Communications by R. Rosenberry.15
01/29/1996Complaint against Ameritech Ohio filed on behalf of Time Warner by R. Rosenberry. (6 pgs.)12
01/24/1996Entry ordering that Time Warner's motion, as drafted, is not in an appropriate complaint format; the PUCO staff will, on their own motion, open a complaint case (96-66-TP-CSS), direct the Docketing Division to place a copy of Time Warner's January 16, 1996, motion in Case Nos. 93-487-TP-ALT and 93-576-TP-CSS into the record of this new case, and direct that Time Warner redraft its motion in proper complaint form and file its complaint by 1/29/96 if it wishes to pursue this issue in complaint form; Ameritech is directed to file its answer to the complaint and any relevant motions by 2/2/96; Time Warner may file a memorandum contra by 2/6/96. (AE) (4 pgs.)4
01/22/1996In the matter of the complaint of Time Warner AxS of Ohio, L.P. and Time Warner Communications of Ohio, L.P. (vs) Ameritech Ohio.1
01/12/1995In the matter of a request of the modernization to roadway gates at Beaumont/T344 and the closure to vehicles at Boyd's Corner Road, Tuscarawas Township, Stark County, Consolidated Rail Corp.5