Skip to main content

Case Record For:

95-1017-TP-CSS

File a Public Comment
Case Title: JAMES WOODMAN/AMERITECH OHIO
Status: AR-Archived
Industry Code: TP-TELEPHONE
Purpose Code: CSS-Complaint on service or safety
Date Opened: 11/1/1995 1:00:00 AM
Date Closed: 5/23/1996
Printable Docket Card Service List
View per page
Date FiledSummaryPages
05/23/1996Entry granting Ameritech's motion to dismiss this complaint for lack of prosecution, and closing it of record. (7 pgs.)7
04/03/1996Request for ruling on supplemental motion to dismiss or in the alternative supplemental motion to compel discovery filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by M. Mulcahy. (19 pgs.)19
03/27/1996Transcript filed for hearing held 3/13/96, (GP), 9 pgs., Con't. (Columbus, Ohio-PUCO)9
03/20/1996Proof of Publication filed. (Cuyahoga County) (1 pg.)1
02/28/1996Supplemental motion to dismiss complaint or, in the alter- native, motion for contiuance of hearing date and memor- andum in support filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by M. Mulcahy. (5 pgs.)5
02/13/1996Entry ordering that complainant shall file its response to Ameritech's motion to compel discovery by 2/20/96; that Ameritech shall file its reply to the complainant's response by 2/23/96. (AE) (3 pgs.)3
02/06/1996Motion to compel discovery and memorandum in support filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by M. Mulcahy. (19 pgs.)19
02/05/1996Legal Notice sent to: The Plain Dealer (Cuyahoga Co.) Certified Mail.0
01/22/1996Entry denying Ameritech's motion to dismiss; that a second prehearing conference be held, via telephone, at 11:00 a.m. on 3/6/96; scheduling a hearing at 10:00 a.m. on 3/13/96 at the Commission offices; that any party intending to present direct expert testimony should file such testimony by 3/7/96. (AE) (5 pgs.)5
12/14/1995Answer filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by M. Mulcahy. (4 pgs.)4
12/07/1995Entry ordering that WeShare's motion to prevent termination of service is moot, an expedited ruling on its request for reconnection is warranted, and its request for reconnection of service is denied, it is further ordered that Ameritech's motion to strike is granted, and a prehearing conference be held at 1:30 p.m. on December 27, 1995 at the offices of the Commission, it is further ordered that Ameritech shall file an answer to the complaint with the commission on or before December 15, 1995. (AE) (4 pgs.)4
11/27/1995Motion to dismiss and memorandum in support filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by M. Mulcahy. (14 pgs.)14
11/21/1995Motion to strike and memorandum contra filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by M. Mulcahy. (4 pgs.)4
11/17/1995Motion to expedite the request for stay order filed on behalf of complainant by A. Valore. (3 pgs.)3
11/16/1995Request for stay order filed on behalf of complainant by R. Valore. (3 pgs.)3
11/14/1995Memorandum contra complainant's request for stay, filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by M. Mulcahy. (8 pgs.)8
11/13/1995Motion for stay filed on behalf of complainant. (2 pgs.)2
11/13/1995Motion to amend the complaint filed on behalf of complain- ant. (5 pgs.)5
11/06/1995Complaint letter and copy of complaint mailed to: Jon F. Kelly, Ameritech Ohio. (1 pg.)1
11/01/1995In the matter of the complaint of James P. Woodman (vs) Ameritech Ohio relative to the alleged unjust, unreasonable and unfair disconnection of service. (21 pgs.)21