|
09/03/1996
|
Returned from Supreme Court, 2 Vols. - Destroyed. |
|
05/13/1996
|
Notice of Appeal of Ameritech Ohio filed by J. Kelly. (27 pgs.) (supreme court# 96-1105) |
|
03/14/1996
|
Entry denying Ameritech's application for rehearing and closing this case of record. (6 pgs.) |
|
02/16/1996
|
Application for rehearing of Ameritech Ohio filed by W. Hunt. (13 pgs.) |
|
01/18/1996
|
Opinion & Order that the complaint is granted in part and denied in part as set forth in this entry; that Ameritech shall craft clarifying language for inclusion on its call- ing card, in the white pages, and its promotional/markering information; that the Consumer Services Department shall review the calling cards and promotional/marketing infor- mation of the other LECs in the state of Ohio. (13 pgs.) |
|
10/24/1995
|
Post-hearing brief filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by W. Hunt. (14 pgs.) |
|
10/24/1995
|
Post-hearing brief filed on behalf of the PUCO staff by A. Hammerstein. (8 pgs.) |
|
10/24/1995
|
Brief and argument filed on behalf of complainant by R. Donahey, Jr. (9 pgs.) |
|
10/04/1995
|
Late-filed Exhibit No. 2, copies of the calling cards and literature accompanying the cards from Ameritech, The Chillicothe Telephone Co., GTE, and Sprint United Tele- phone, filed on behalf of the PUCO staff by A. Hammerstein. (10 pgs.) |
|
10/04/1995
|
Transcript filed for hearing held 9/21/95, (GP), 148 pgs., Submitted. |
|
09/20/1995
|
Testimony of Lisa M. Colosimo filed on behalf of the PUCO staff by A. Hammerstein. (15 pgs.) |
|
09/14/1995
|
Testimony of Laura Butz filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by W. Hunt. (12 pgs.) |
|
07/10/1995
|
Entry ordering that Ameritech's motion is granted in part, in accordance with Finding 11; that the hearing in this matter be rescheduled for 10:00 a.m. on 9/21/95 at the Commission offices; that all discovery in this matter should be completed by 9/7/95. (AE) (3 pgs.) |
|
07/10/1995
|
Notice of unavailability of complainant for hearing filed by R. Donahey, Jr. (2 pgs.) |
|
07/07/1995
|
Proof of Publication filed. (Franklin County) (2 pgs.) |
|
07/06/1995
|
Answer filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by W. Hunt. (3 pgs.) |
|
06/23/1995
|
Memorandum in response to Ameritech's motion to shorten time to respond to discovery or, alternatively, for con- tinuance and for an expedited ruling filed on behalf of the PUCO staff by A. Hammerstein. (3 pgs.) |
|
06/16/1995
|
Notice of appearance of counsel filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by W. Hunt. (2 pgs.) |
|
06/16/1995
|
Motion to shorten time to respond to discovery or, alter- natively, for continuance and for an expedited ruling and memorandum in support filed on behalf of respondent, Ameri- tech Ohio, by W. Hunt. (16 pgs.) |
|
06/12/1995
|
Notice of intervention filed on behalf of the PUCO staff by A. Hammerstein. (2 pgs.) |
|
06/08/1995
|
Legal Notice sent to: Columbus Dispatch (Franklin Co.) |
|
06/06/1995
|
Entry scheduling a hearing at 10:00 a.m. on 7/11/95 at the Commission offices. (AE) (3 pgs.) |
|
05/04/1995
|
Entry denying Ameritech's application for rehearing. (3 pgs.) |
|
04/26/1995
|
Memorandum contra application for rehearing filed on behalf of complainant by R. Donahey, Jr. (5 pgs.) |
|
04/13/1995
|
Application for rehearing filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech, by M. Mulcahy. (7 pgs.) |
|
03/16/1995
|
Entry denying Ameritech's motion to dismiss; scheduling a prehearing conference at 1:30 p.m. on 4/6/95 at the Com- mission offices. (4 pgs.) |
|
01/19/1995
|
Reply to memorandum contra, filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by M. Mulcahy. (7 pgs.) |
|
01/11/1995
|
Memorandum contra Ameritech Ohio motion to dismiss filed on behalf of complainant by R. Donahey, Jr. (4 pgs.) |
|
01/03/1995
|
Motion to dismiss and memorandum in support filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by M. Mulcahy. (6 pgs.) |
|
12/13/1994
|
Complaint letter and copy of complaint mailed to: Michael J. Karson, Ameritech Ohio. |
|
12/12/1994
|
In the matter of the complaint of Richard S. Donahey, Jr. (vs) Ameritech Ohio relative to the alleged unjust and misleading advertisement concerning a credit card to assist their customers while away from their homes. (1 pg.) |