Date Filed | Summary | Pages |
02/08/1996 | Entry denying the application for rehearing filed by Cincin- nati Bell Telephone. (6 pgs.) | 6 |
01/29/1996 | AT&T's memorandum contra the application for rehearing of Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company filed by R. Quinn, Jr., W. Newcomb, Jr. (5 pgs.) | 5 |
01/29/1996 | Memorandum contra application for rehearing of Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company filed by D. Townsley, J. Sanders. (7 pgs.) | 7 |
01/19/1996 | Application for rehearing and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell by C. Wilson. (19 pgs.) | 19 |
12/21/1995 | Finding & order granting the application as set forth in Findings 6 and 7, provided Ameritech's and CBT's compar- able services remain detariffed. (12 pgs.) | 12 |
08/25/1995 | Entry granting CBT's motion to intervene. (AE) (3 pgs.) | 3 |
06/30/1995 | Motion to Intervene filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company by J. Harrison. (6 pgs.) | 0 |
06/15/1995 | Entry granting Ameritech Ohio's and the OTA's motions to intervene. (AE) (4 pgs.) | 0 |
06/12/1995 | Statement of interest filed on behalf of The Ohio Telephone Association by J. Prohaska. (4 pgs.) | 0 |
01/17/1995 | Sprint's response to Ameritech's motion contra filed by M. Hull. (4 pgs.) | 0 |
12/27/1994 | Motion to intervene and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by J. Kelly. (4 pgs.) | 0 |
12/27/1994 | Memorandum contra filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by J. Kelly. (9 pgs.) | 0 |
12/22/1994 | Motion to intervene and memorandum in support filed on behalf of The Ohio Telephone Association by J. Prohaska. (8 pgs.) | 0 |
12/09/1994 | In the matter of the application of Sprint Communications Company L.P. to request a waiver to bring the company into "competitive equilibrium" with the "detariffed" status granted to Ameritech Ohio for cell 4 services in Case No. 93-487-TP-ALT. (8 pgs.) | 0 |