DIS - Case Record for 94-1223-TP-PEX Skip to main content

Case Record For:

94-1223-TP-PEX

File a Public Comment
Case Title: OLIVE CLARK/GTE NORTH
Status: AR-Archived
Industry Code: TP-TELEPHONE
Purpose Code: PEX-Petition for extended area service
Date Opened: 7/18/1994
Date Closed: 11/10/1994
Printable Docket Card Service List
View All
1 - 15 of 20 documents 1 /  2 
Date FiledSummaryPages
07/13/1995Revised tariff, PUCO No. 6, Check List, 337th sheet 1; Section 2.3, 36th sheet 4, filed on behalf of respondent, GTE North, by J. Kennedy. (3 pgs.)3
07/07/1995Tariff, PUCO No. 1, Section 5, 9th sheet 5, 5th sheet 46.9, filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by D. McKenzie. (3 pgs.)0
03/09/1995Letter stating that the in-service date for the institution of two-way measured-rate EAS between GTE's Carrollton (216-627) exchange and Ameritech's Canton exchange is July 17, 1995, filed on behalf of respondent, GTE North, by J. Kennedy. (1 pg.)0
02/21/1995Information response of Ameritech Ohio filed by J. Kelly. (2 pgs.)0
01/05/1995Entry denying the application for rehearing of the IXCs. (4 pgs.)0
12/22/1994Memorandum contra application for rehearing filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by J. Kelly. (5 pgs.)0
12/20/1994Memorandum contra to application for rehearing, filed on behalf of respondent, GTE North, by J. Stewart. (4 pgs.)0
12/12/1994Application for rehearing filed on behalf of AT&T Communi- cation by R. Quinn, Jr.; LDDS Communications and MCI Tele- communication Corp. by J. Sanders; and LCI International Telecom Corp. by H. Liebman. (8 pgs.)0
11/15/1994Letter withdrawing as a party of record to this case, and stating that the law firm of Bell, Royer & Sanders Co. LPA no longer represents Allnet, filed on behalf of Allnet Communication Services by J. Sanders. (1 pg.)0
11/10/1994Finding & Order granting the IXCs' request to intervene; that the stipulation submitted on September 26, 1994, is approved in its entirey; that GTE and Ameritech should implement two-way, measured-rate EAS between the Carroll- ton and Canton exchanges within 12 months; that GTE and Ameritech establish an in-service date within four months and inform the Commission of the date not later than 60 days prior to the in-service date in the event the date cannot be met. (8 pgs.)0
11/04/1994Reply filed on behalf of AT&T Communications by R. Charles- ton; LCI International Telecom by H. Liebman; and Allnet Communications Services, LDDS Communications, and MCI Tele- communications by J. Sanders. (6 pgs.)0
10/24/1994Response to comments, statement of opposition and, alter- natively, motion for leave to intervene of AT&T Communica- tions of Ohio, Allnet Communication Services, LDDS Communi- cations, MCI Telecommunications Corp. and LCI International Telecom, filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by C. Martaus. (10 pgs.)0
10/20/1994Memorandum in opposition to the comments, statements of opposition, and motions for leave to intervene of AT&T Communications of Ohio, Allnet Communication Services, LDDS Communications, MCI Telecommunications Corp. and LCI International Telecom, filed on behalf of GTE North by J. Stewart. (9 pgs.)0
10/14/1994Comments, statement of opposition and, alternatively, motion for leave to intervene filed on behalf of AT&T Communications by R. Charleston; LCI International Tele- com Corp. by H. Liebman; Allnet Communications Services, LDDS Communications, and MCI Telecommunications Corp. by J. Sanders. (7 pgs.)0
09/26/1994Stipulation, agreement and recommendation filed on behalf of complainant by O. Clark; respondents, GTE North by J. Stewart; Ameritech Ohio by C. Markaus. (7 pgs.)0
 
1 /  2 
      
      
Attorney General:
Attorney Examiner:
Jones, Jeffrey