Skip to main content

Case Record For:

93-1947-TP-PEX

File a Public Comment
Case Title: JAMES NASH/ALLTELL OHIO
Status: AR-Archived
Industry Code: TP-TELEPHONE
Purpose Code: PEX-Petition for extended area service
Date Opened: 11/29/1993
Date Closed: 10/6/1994
Printable Docket Card Service List
View per page
Date FiledSummaryPages
08/18/1995Local Exchange tariff, PUCO No. 6, check sheet 1, section F third revised sheet 3 filed on behalf of United Telephone by G. Gratz. (3 pgs.)3
08/10/1995Tariff, PUCO No. 1, Section 5, 10th sheet 5, 4th sheet 7, 21st sheet 8, 5th sheet 15, 10th sheet 33, 1st sheet 33.1, 7th sheet 46.9, 8th sheet 53, filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by D. McKenzie. (9 pgs.)9
03/20/1995Letter of Authorization for Marcy Kaptur filed on behalf of complainant by J. Nash. (2 pgs.)0
01/31/1995Information response filed on behalf of respondent, Ameri- tech Ohio, by C. Rawlings. (2 pgs.)0
01/18/1995Letter stating that the implementation date for two-way measured-rate extended area service is August 22, 1995, filed on behalf of respondent, Alltel Ohio, by J. Ludenia. (1 pg.)0
12/12/1994Information response filed on behalf of respondent, Alltel Ohio, by T. Lodge. (2 pgs.)0
12/01/1994Entry on Rehearing of the IXCs is denied. (5 pgs.)0
11/17/1994Memorandum contra to the application for rehearing, filed on behalf of respondent, GTE North, by B. Kazee. (3 pgs.)0
11/17/1994Memorandum in opposition to application for rehearing, filed on behalf of respondent, Alltel Ohio, by T. Lodge. (6 pgs.)0
11/17/1994Memorandum contra application for rehearing, fled on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by J. Kelly. (4 pgs.)0
11/16/1994Memorandum contra filed on behalf of respondent, United Telephone Co., by S. Williams. (6 pgs.)0
11/15/1994Letter withdrawing as a party of record to this case, and stating that the law firm of Bell, Royer & Sanders Co. LPA no longer represents Allnet, filed on behalf of Allnet Communication Services by J. Sanders. (1 pg.)0
11/07/1994Application for rehearing filed on behalf of respondents, AT&T Communications by R. Charleston; Allnet Communications, LDDS Communications, and MCI Telecommunications by J. San- ders; and LCI International Telecom by H. Liebman. (17 pgs.)0
10/27/1994Entry Nunc Pro Tunc ordering that the October 6, 1994 Find- ing & Order should be corrected to reflect the Swanton Exchange as the correct exchange. (2 pgs.)0
10/06/1994Finding & Order approving the stipulation in its entirety; that Alltel impelment two-way, measured-rate EAS from the Delta exchange to the Toledo, Sylvania, and Holland ex- changes, that Ohio Bell implement two-way, measured-rate EAS from the Toledo and Holland exchanges to the Delta exchange, and that United implement two-way, measured-rate EAS from the Swanton exchange to the Delta exchange within 12 months from the date of this Finding & Order; that All- tel, United, and Ohio Bell establish an in-service date within four months of the date of this Finding & Order, inform the Commission and the spokesperson of the date, and advise the Commission and the spokesperson of the date no later than 60 days prior to the in-service date in the event the date cannot be met. (11 pgs.)0
09/07/1994Response letter to Mr. Jim Nash filed on behalf of the PUCO staff. (2 pgs.)0
09/07/1994Correspondence letter regarding petition, filed on behalf of complainant by J. Nash. (21 pgs.)0
08/01/1994Reply to response of Allnet Communications Services, MCI Telecommunications Corp., LDDS Communication, LCI Inter- national Telecom Corp., and AT&T Communications of Ohio, filed on behalf of Alltel Ohio by T. Lodge.0
08/01/1994Reply to response of Allnet Communications Services, MCI Telecommunications Corp., LDDS Communication, LCI Inter- national Telecom Corp., and AT&T Communications of Ohio, filed on behalf of GTE North by B. Kazee.0
08/01/1994Reply to response of Allnet Communications Services, MCI Telecommunications Corp., LDDS Communication, LCI Inter- national Telecom Corp., and AT&T Communications of Ohio, filed on behalf of United Telephone Company of Ohio by S. Williams.0
07/29/1994Reply to response of Allnet Communication Services, Inc.; MCI Telecommunications Corp.; LDDS Communications; LCI International Telecom Corp.; and AT&T Communications of Ohio (IXCs), filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by C. Mar- taus.0
07/25/1994Response of Allnet Communications Services, Inc. MCI Telecommunications Corporation, LDDS Communication, LCI International Telecom Corp., and AT&T Cummunications of Ohio, Inc. filed by R. Charleston, J. Sanders and H. Liebman.0
07/07/1994Entry ordering that the IXC's motion to intervene be granted; that the IXCs file by 7/24/94 a clarification of their pleading indicating whether they only wished to bring the issues to the attention of the Commission or identifying those issues to be briefed and those issues for which they request a hearing; that Alltel, Ohio Bell, United, GTE, and the spokesperson may file replies to the IXCs clarification by 7/31/94.0
04/26/1994Reply filed on behalf of Allnet Communications Services and MCI Telecommunication Corp. by J. Sanders; LCI Inter- national Telecom Corp. by H. Liebman; and AT&T Communica- tions of Ohio by R. Charleston.0
04/21/1994Correspondence letter opposing long distance phone services of Northwest Ohio filed by J. Nash.0
04/18/1994Response to comments, statement of opposition and, alter- natively, motion for leave to intervene of Allnet Communi- cations Services, AT&T Communications, MCI Telecommunica- tions, and LCI International Telecom, filed on behalf of respondent, Ohio Bell, by T. Lodge.0
04/18/1994Response to comments, statement of opposition and, alter- natively, motion for leave to intervene of Allnet Communi- cations Services, AT&T Communications, MCI Telecommunica- tions, and LCI International Telecom, filed on behalf of respondent, Alltel Ohio, by C. Martaus.0
04/14/1994Letter clarifying the intentions of the parties in their stipulation, agreement and recommendation filed on March 8, 1994, filed by T. Lodge.0
04/01/1994Comments, statement of opposition and, alternatively, motion for leave to intervene filed on behalf of Allnet Communica- cations Services, AT&T Communications of Ohio, and MCI Telecommunications Corp. by J. Sanders, and LCI Inter- national Telecom Corp. by H. Liebman.0
03/08/1994Stipulation, agreement and recommendation filed on behalf of complainants by J. Nash; respondents, Alltel Ohio by T. Lodge, Ohio Bell Telephone Co. by C. Martaus, United Telephone Company of Ohio by T. Jacobs, and GTE North by B. Kazee.0
01/31/1994Information response filed on behalf of respondent, Ohio Bell, by C. Martaus.0
01/31/1994Answer filed on behalf of respondent, Ohio Bell, by C. Martaus.0
01/31/1994Answer and information response filed on behalf of respondent, United Telephone Company, by T. Jacobs.0
01/31/1994Answer and information response filed on behalf of respondent, Alltel Ohio, by T. Lodge.0
01/26/1994Answer and information response filed on behalf of respondent, GTE North, by B. Kazee.0
12/28/1993Entry ordering that each respondent file its written answer by 1/31/94; that each respondent provide, by 1/31/94, the information required by Finding 3; that the parties comply with Finding 4; scheduling a settle- ment conference at 1:00 p.m. on 2/3/94 at the Commission offices. (AE)0
11/29/1993In the matter of the petition of James Nash and subscribers of the 822 exchange of Alltell Ohio for extended area service from Delta to Swanton, Holland, Toledo, Sylvania, Maumee and Perrysburg.0