DIS - Case Record for 93-1758-RC-CSS Skip to main content

Case Record For:

93-1758-RC-CSS

File a Public Comment
Case Title: CELLNET/GTE MOBILNET ET AL
Status: CL-CLOSED
Industry Code: RC-RADIO COMMON CARRIERS
Purpose Code: CSS-Complaint on service or safety
Date Opened: 10/18/1993
Date Closed: 9/23/2014
Printable Docket Card Service List
View per page
Date FiledSummaryPages
09/23/2014Case Action Form closing case with an effective date of 9/23/2014. electronically filed by Mrs. Donielle Genesky on behalf of PUCO2
01/24/2011Memo closing case with an effective date of 01/24/11.1
02/02/2010Confidential Release: Deposition of Leigh Wood originally filed on 1/21/1999.163
02/02/2010Confidential document originally filed January 21, 1999 released as public information as of 2/2/2010. (Continued deposition of David Shanks)76
02/02/2010Confidential document originally filed on January 21, 1999 released as public information as of 2/2/2010. (Yoder deposition Ex. 1)70
01/07/2010Confidential release of deposition transcript of Robert G. Zicker taken December 17, 1998, filed on behalf of complainant by R. Hart. (38 pgs.) 38
08/19/2009Confidential Release: Cellnet exhibit # 40 (Part 11) filed February 10, 1999.155
08/19/2009Confidential Release: Cellnet exhibit # 40 (Part 10) filed February 10, 1999.152
08/19/2009Confidential Release: Cellnet exhibit # 40 (Part 9) filed February 10, 1999.204
08/19/2009Confidential Release: Cellnet exhibit # 40 (Part 8) filed February 10, 1999.202
08/19/2009Confidential Release: Cellnet exhibit # 40 (Part 7) filed February 10, 1999.201
08/19/2009Confidential Release: Cellnet exhibit # 40 (Part 6) filed February 10, 1999.201
08/19/2009Confidential Release: Cellnet exhibit # 40 (Part 5) filed February 10, 1999.201
08/19/2009Confidential Release: Cellnet exhibit # 40 (Part 4) filed February 10, 1999.201
08/19/2009Confidential Release: Cellnet exhibit # 40 (Part 3) filed February 10, 1999.201
08/19/2009Confidential Release: Cellnet exhibit # 40 (Part 2) filed February 10, 1999.201
08/19/2009Confidential Release: Cellnet exhibit # 40 (Part 1) filed with transcript of hearing held January 28, 1999 filed February 10, 1999.203
08/18/2009Confidential Release: Cellnet exhibit #103 (Part 8) filed March 1, 1999.162
08/18/2009Confidential Release: Cellnet exhibit #103 (Part 7) filed March 1, 1999.203
08/18/2009Confidential Release: Cellnet exhibit #103 (Part 6) filed March 1, 1999.197
08/18/2009Confidential Release: Cellnet exhibit #103 (Part 5) filed March 1, 1999.212
08/18/2009Confidential Release: Cellnet exhibit #103 (Part 4) filed March 1, 1999.206
08/18/2009Confidential Release: Cellnet exhibit #103 (Part 3) filed March 1, 1999.214
08/18/2009Confidential Release: Cellnet exhibit #103. (Part 2) filed March 1, 1999.204
08/18/2009Confidential Release: Cellnet Exhibit # 103 (Part1) filed March 1, 1999.217
08/18/2009Confidential Release: Submission of pre-filed testimony of Peter Coules, filed January 21, 1999.12
08/18/2009Confidential Release: Index of exhibits. (Part 4) filed January 25, 1999.29
08/18/2009Confidential Release: Index of exhibits. (Part 3) filed January 25, 1999.198
08/18/2009Confidential Release: Index of exhibits. (Part 2) filed January 25, 1999.198
08/18/2009Confidential Release: Index of exhibits. (Part 1) filed January 25, 1999.161
08/18/2009Confidential Release: Cellnet's memorandum in support filed January 25, 1999.32
08/18/2009Confidential Release: Cellnet's motion for default judgement against GTE or in the alternative, bifurcation and continuation of the GTE case; and leave to amend its complaint as to the GTE Entities to include claims of spoliation of evidence filed January 25, 1999.4
08/18/2009Confidential Release: Cellnet's motion for default judgement against GTE and accompanying memorandum and supporting documents filed January 25, 1999.3
08/17/2009Confidential Release: Continuation of the deposition of Pat Bennett filed January 21, 1999.7
08/17/2009Confidential Release: Complainant Westside Cellular dba Cellnet of Ohio Inc.'s motion for leave to submit sur-reply instanter to Airtouch's reply brief filed May 17, 1999.13
08/17/2009Confidential Release: Expert testimony of Robert Ferguson filed March 1, 1999.124
08/17/2009Confidential Release: Supplemental expert testimony of Robert Ferguson and exhibits filed February 2, 1999.59
08/17/2009Confidential Release: Airtouch Cellular account level pricing plans filed February 2, 1999.52
08/17/2009Confidential Release: Motion of the GTE to quash witness subpoena and for protective order filed April 13, 1999.24
08/17/2009Confidential Release: Post-hearing brief of respondent, New Par, dba Airtouch Cellular filed April 30, 1999.57
08/17/2009Confidential Release: Post-hearing brief of respondent, New Par, dba Airtouch Cellular filed April 15, 1999.96
08/17/2009Confidential Release: Complainant Cellnet's sixth motion to compel and for sanctions against the GTE Entities filed May 18, 1999.34
08/17/2009Confidential Release: Exhibits filed March 1, 1999.101
08/17/2009Confidential Release: Exhibits 2 & 4-5 to the prefiled testimony of Patrick J. Bennett submitted by respondent, New Par, filed January 21, 1999.67
08/17/2009Confidential Release: Exhibits 2-3 & 5-10 to the prefiled testimony of David A. Shank submitted by respondent, New Par filed January 21, 1999.103
08/17/2009Confidential Release: Complainant Westside Cellular, dba Cellnet of Ohio, Inc.'s post hearing brief in support of findings against The Airtouch Entities filed April 15, 1999.201
08/17/2009Confidential Release: Complainant Westside Cellular, dba Cellnet of Ohio, Inc.'s, post hearing brief in support of findings against respondent Cincinnati SMSA Limited Partnership aka Ameritech Mobile Communications, Inc., filed April 15, 1999.60
08/06/2009Confidential Release: Complainant Cellnet's memorandum contra to the GTE entities motion to enforce stipulated confidential agreement filed on May 28, 1999 release on August 6, 2009.41
08/06/2009Confidential Release: Memorandum in support of motion to strike GTE's brief as untimely filed and reply memorandum in support of Cellnet's sixth motion to compel and for sanctions against the GTE entities filed on June 9, 1999 released on August 6, 2009.21
08/06/2009Confidential Release: Complainant Westside Cellular dba Cellnet of Ohio, Inc. reply brief in support of findings against the Airtouch entities filed on April 30, 1999 release on August 6, 2009.60
08/06/2009Confidential Release: Expert testimony of Robert Ferguson filed on January 21, 1999 released on August 6, 2009.124
08/06/2009Confidential Release: Motion to file under seal, supplemental expert testimony of Robert Ferguson filed on April 30, 2009 released August 6, 2009.3
08/06/2009Confidential Release: Supplemental expert testimony of Robert Ferguson filed April 30, 1999 released on August 6, 2009.28
08/06/2009Confidential Release: Submission of prefiled testimony of Nancy Behrend filed on January 21, 1999 released to public on August 6, 2009. 14
03/15/2003Motion to compel GTE Mobilnet to provide responses to discovery requests filed on behalf of Westside Cellular dba Cellnet by M. Grady.65
07/25/2001Supreme Court transmittal papers filed.4
07/20/2001Supreme Court Transmittal Papers.9
06/22/2001Notice of appeal of appellant Cincinnati SMSA Limited Partnership filed by M. Wallach. (S.C. #01-1158)106
06/20/2001Notice of Appeal of appellants New Par, fka AirTouch Cellular, Northern Ohio Cellular Telephone Company, Akron Cellular Telephone Company, Canton Cellular Telephone Company, Lorain/Elyria Cellular Telephone Company, Cellular Communications, Inc., Mansfield Cellular Telephone Company, Columbus Cellular Telephone Company, AirTouch Cellular of Ohio, Pactel Cellular of Ohio, Inc. filed by K. Trafford. (S.C. #01-1132)9
06/19/2001Service Notice.5
06/18/2001Supreme Court Transmittal Papers. (S.C. #01-960)52
06/18/2001Supreme Court Transmittal Papers. (S.C. #01-960)109
05/18/2001Notice of appeal of appellant Westside Cellular, Inc dba Cellnet.170
04/25/2001Entry ordering that the Opinion & Order is clarified pursuant to Finding 10; that the submitted applications for rehearing are denied as addressed in this entry; to the extent not specifically addresses, all other arguments raised in the applications for rehearing are denied.44
03/19/2001Service Notice6
03/16/2001Service Notice6
03/15/2001Entry ordering that the applications for rehearing filed by Cellnet, Cincinnati SMSA, and AirTouch Cellular are granted for the limited purpose of allowing the Commission additional time in which to consider the issues raised on rehearing.2
03/02/2001Memorandum contra Cincinnati SMSA Limited Partnership's application for rehearing, filed on behalf of complainant, Westside Cellular dba Cellnet, by R. Hart.95
02/26/2001Memorandum contra Cellnet's application for rehearing, filed on behalf of respondent, Cincinnati SMSA Limited Partnership, by J. Kelly.14
02/26/2001Memorandum contra New Par Companies application for rehearing, filed on behalf of complainant, Westside Cellular dba Cellnet, by R. Hart.86
02/26/2001Memorandum contra Westside Cellular dba Cellnet's application for rehearing, filed on behalf of respondent, New Par Companies, by K. Trafford.10
02/20/2001Application for rehearing filed on behalf of respondent, Cincinnati SMSA Limited Partnership, by J. Kelly.57
02/16/2001Application for rehearing filed on behalf of respondent, New Par Companies fka AirTouch Cellular, by K. Trafford.87
02/16/2001Application for rehearing and brief in support filed on behalf of complainant, Westside Cellular dba Cellnet, by R. Hart.21
01/18/2001Opinion & Order that Cellnet's complaint is granted in part and denied in part; that since this is a case of first impression, the Commission finds that the imposition of statutory penalties against Ameritech Mobile and AirTouch Cellular are not warranted in this case; that the docketing division should maintain for 18 months from the date of this order, all documents that have been granted protective status in this docket.100
12/31/2000Supplemental filing of exhibits to complainant Cellnet's fifth motion to compel discovery from GTE and motion for sanctions against GTE, filed by R. Hart.35
06/30/2000Motion for emergency relief for unlawful disconnection of service and motion for expedited ruling and memorandum in support filed on behalf of complainants by J. Migden.84
05/03/2000Reply memorandum in support of motion to compel, filed on behalf of AirTouch Cellular by K. Trafford.24
04/24/2000Memorandum in opposition to AirTouch's motion to compel, filed on behalf of complainant by R. Hart.8
04/04/2000Motion to compel complainant to comply with the August 5, 1999 and September 30, 1999 entries on rehearing, filed on behalf of respondent, New Par, by K. Trafford.31
12/31/1999Motion to compel the deposition of Linda Libra, motion for sanctions and request for expedited ruling and memorandum in support filed on behalf of complainant by R. Hart.10
09/30/1999Entry denying AirTouch's application for rehearing; that Cellnet's motion to strike is denied. (6 pgs.)6
09/21/1999Objection to latest round of briefs and arguments submitted by AirTouch Cellular, filed on behalf of complainant by M. Griffin. (2 pgs.)2
09/17/1999Memorandum contra complainant's motion to strike application for rehearing filed on behalf of respondent, New Par, dba AirTouch Cellular, by K. Trafford. (11 pgs.)11
09/13/1999Complainant, Westside Cellular dba Cellnet of Ohio's motion to strike AirTouch's application for rehearing, and memoran- dum in support filed by M. Griffin. (22 pgs.)22
09/07/1999Correspondence letter dated September 2, 1999, to Kathleen M. Trafford, filed on behalf of complainant by R. Hart. (2 pgs.)2
09/03/1999Application for rehearing and memorandum in support filed on behalf of respondent, New Par dba AirTouch Cellular, by K. Trafford. (11 pgs.)11
09/01/1999Letter requesting that Cellnet be ordered to comply with the Entry on Rehearing no later than the next payment date, September 10, 1999, filed on behalf of respondent, AirTouch, by K. Trafford. (2 pgs.)2
08/18/1999Letter stating that the GTE Entities will not pursue the opportunity to file briefs, filed by T. Lodge. (1 pg.)1
08/09/1999Withdrawal of Westside Cellular dba Cellnet of Ohio's motion requesting that the Commission mediate the setting of pay- ment terms and request for expedited ruling, filed by R. Hart. (2 pgs.)2
08/05/1999Entry ordering that Cellnet's motion to dismiss without prejudice is granted; that GTE Entities may file a brief in this matter in accordance with Finding 4; that Cell- net may file a reply brief in accordance with Finding 4; that GTE Entities' motion for a protective order is moot in accordance with Finding 7. (5 pgs.)5
08/05/1999Entry ordering that Cellnet's application for rehearing with respect to issues related to the AirTouch portion of this proceeding is granted in part and denied in part as set forth in this entry; that Cellnet's application for rehearing with respect to issues related to the GTE Entities' portion of this proceeding is moot as described in this entry; that Ameritech's request for Commission consideration of the arguments made by Ameritech in its memoranda contra Cellnet's motion for leave to submit a sur-reply brief shall be granted. (5 pgs.)5
08/02/1999Westside Cellular dba Cellnet of Ohio's motion requesting that the Commission mediate the setting of payment terms and request for expedited ruling and memorandum in support filed by R. Hart. (7 pgs.)7
07/29/1999Complainant Westside Cellular dba Cellnet of Ohio's brief in opposition to the GTE Entities' motion for protective order regarding confidential information and request for expedited ruling, filed by R. Hart. (26 pgs.)26
07/26/1999Correspondence letter to Randy J. Hart confirming the con- versation with Jay Agranoff, PUCO staff, filed on behalf of respondents by J. Niehaus. (3 pgs.)3
07/26/1999Motion of The GTE Entities for protective order regarding confidential information and request for expedited ruling and memorandum in support filed by T. Lodge. (17 pgs.)17
07/23/1999Response to James B. Niehaus to his earlier correspondence in connection with the Commission's July 7, 1999 entry, filed on behalf of complainant by R. Hart. (9 pgs.) (FILED 7/22/99)9
07/22/1999Memorandum contra complainant's application for rehearing of the Commission's July 7, 1999 entry and complainant's motion to dismiss the GTE Entities, filed on behalf of AirTouch Cellular by K. Trafford. (11 pgs.)11
07/22/1999Memorandum of The GTE Entities opposing Cellnet's applica- tion for rehearing of Commission's July 7, 1999 entry, filed by T. Lodge. (5 pgs.)5
07/19/1999Response of the GTE Entities to Cellnet's motion to volun- tarily dismiss, filed by T. Lodge. (4 pgs.)4
07/16/1999Request that the Commission consider the arguments Ameri- tech made in its memorandum contra in reaching its merit decision in this case, filed on behalf of respondent, Ameri- tech Ohio, by J. Kelly. (2 pgs.)2
07/14/1999Correspondence letter dated July 14, 1999, to Randy H. Hart, filed on behalf of respondents by J. Niehaus. (5 pgs.)5
07/12/1999Westside Cellular dba Cellnet of Ohio's application for rehearing of the Commission's July 7, 1999 entry and memor- andum in support, filed by R. Hart. (34 pgs.)34
07/12/1999Complainant Westside Cellular dba Cellnet of Ohio's motion to voluntarily dismiss the GTE Entities without prejudice filed on an expedited basis and memorandum in support filed by R. Hart. (5 pgs.)5
07/09/1999Complainant Westside Cellular dba Cellnet of Ohio's sur- reply brief in support of findings against Ameritech, filed by R. Hart. (9 pgs.)9
07/07/1999Entry ordering that GTE Entities' motion to quash is granted in part and denied in part; that Cellnet's motion to extend discovery is granted; that Cellnet and GTE Entities complete their depositions or provide the requisite clarification in accordance with Finding 7 and 10; that GTE Entities' motion to enforce the confidentiality agreement is denied; that any amended confidentiality agreement must be submitted by July 19, 1999; that Cellnet's motion to strike is denied; that Cellnet's sixth motion to compel is granted in part and denied in part; that GTE Entities provide Cellnet with the requisite information within 30 days of this entry; that Cellnet's motion to submit a sur-reply to Ameritech's reply brief is granted; that Cellnet's motion to submit a sur- reply to AirTouch's reply brief is denied; that Cellnet's motion for emergency relief is denied. (31 pgs.)31
07/02/1999Reply memorandum in support of Cellnet's motion to deem as admitted Cellnet's requests for admissions, filed on behalf of complainant by R. Hart. (5 pgs.)5
06/26/1999Exhibit list for Ameritech and AirTouch filed by R. Hart.4
06/25/1999The GTE Entities' brief in opposition to complainant Westside Cellular dba Cellnet's motion to deem as admitted Cellnet's requests for admissions, filed by T. Lodge. (33 pgs.)33
06/18/1999Complainant Westside Cellular dba Cellnet's motion to deem as admitted Cellnet's requests for admissions and memorandum in support filed by R. Hart. (48 pgs.)48
06/17/1999Memorandum contra complainant's motion for emergency relief filed on behalf of respondent, AirTouch, by K. Trafford. (16 pgs.)16
06/16/1999Redacted memorandum in support of motion to strike GTE's brief contra as untimely filed on behalf of complainant by R. Hart.15
06/16/1999Redacted version of Sixth Motion to compel and for sanctions against the GTE Entities filed on behalf of complainant by R. Hart.40
06/16/1999Redacted version of complainant Cellnet's sixth motion to compel and for sanctions against the GTE Entities, filed by R. Hart. (34 pgs.)34
06/16/1999Redacted version of complainant Cellnet's memorandum in support of motion to strike GTE's brief contra as untimely filed and reply memorandum in support of Cellnet's sixth motion to compel and for sanctions against the GTE Entities, filed by R. Hart. (23 pgs.)23
06/11/1999Response of The GTE Entities to Cellnet's motion to strike, filed by T. Lodge. (4 pgs.)4
06/10/1999Complainant Westside Cellular dba Cellnet's motion for emergency relief and motion for expedited ruling and memorandum in support, filed by R. Hart. (23 pgs.)23
06/09/1999Confidential memorandum in support of motion to strike GTE's brief contra as untimely filed and reply memorandum in support of Cellnet's sixth motion to compel and for sanc- tions against the GTE Entities, filed by R. Hart. (22 pgs.) (FILED UNDER SEAL)22
06/09/1999Motion to file under seal complainant Westside Cellular, dba Cellnet of Ohio's memorandum in support of motion to strike GTE's brief contra as untimely filed and reply memorandum in support of Cellnet's sixth motion to compel and for sanctions against the GTE Entities, filed by R. Hart. (2 pgs.)2
06/09/1999Complainant Westside Cellular, dba Cellnet of Ohio's motion to strike GTE's brief contra as untimely filed, filed by R. Hart. (2 pgs.)2
06/05/1999Motion for protective order and memorandum in support filed on behalf of complainant by R. Hart.6
06/04/1999Cincinnati SMSA Limited Partnership's memorandum contra, filed by J. Kelly. (9 pgs.)9
06/04/1999The GTE Entities' memorandum contra Cellnet's motion for sixth motion to compel and for sanctions, filed by T. Lodge. (18 pgs.)18
06/04/1999The GTE Entities' reply memorandum in support of motion to enforce confidentiality agreement, filed by T. Lodge. (5 pgs.)5
06/01/1999Respondent New Par's memorandum contra complainant's motion for leave to file sur-reply instanter and motion to strike sur reply filed by K. Trafford. (11 pgs.)11
05/28/1999Complainant Cellnet's Memorandum Contra the GTE Entities' Motion to Enforce Stipulated Confidentiality Agreement. (FILED UNDER SEAL) (49 pgs.)49
05/28/1999Motion to file under seal complainant Cellnet's Memorandum Contra; GTE Entities' Motion to Enforce Stipulated Confidentiality Agreement. Submitted by: J. Hart. (4 pgs.)4
05/24/1999The GTE Entities' memorandum contra Cellnet's motion for enlargement of time to complete discovery, filed by T. Lodge. (7 pgs.)7
05/18/1999Confidential complainant Westside Cellular dba Cellnet of Ohio's motion filed under seal for leave to submit Cellnet's sur-reply instanter to AirTouch's reply brief, filed by R. Hart. (12 pgs.) (FILED UNDER SEAL)12
05/18/1999Complainant Westside Cellular dba Cellnet of Ohio's motion for leave to submit Cellnet's sur-reply instanter to Ameri- tech's reply brief, filed by R. Hart. (9 pgs.)9
05/18/1999Confidential Cellnet's sixth motion to compel and for sanctions against the GTE Entities, filed by R. Hart. (33 pgs.) (FILED UNDER SEAL)33
05/18/1999Motion to file under seal complainant Westside Cellular dba Cellnet of Ohio's motion and memorandum in support of Cellnet's sixth motion to compel and for sanctions against the GTE Entities, filed by R. Hart. (2 pgs.)2
05/14/1999Motion for enlargement of time to complete discovery filed on behalf of complainant by R. Hart. (3 pgs.)3
05/12/1999The GTE Entities motion to enforce stipulated confidential- ity agreement and memorandum in support, filed by T. Lodge. (11 pgs.)11
05/10/1999Redacted version of complainant Westside Cellular dba Cell- net of Ohio's post-hearing brief in support of findings against the AirTouch Entities, filed by R. Hart. (231 pgs.)231
05/10/1999Redacted version of complainant Westside Cellular dba Cell- net of Ohio's reply brief in support of findings against the AirTouch Entities, filed by R. Hart. (61 pgs.)61
05/10/1999Reply brief in spport of motion of The GTE Entities to quash witness subpoenas and for protective order, filed on behalf of respondent, GTE Entities, by T. Lodge. (10 pgs.)10
05/03/1999Post-hearing reply brief filed on behalf of respondent, New Par dba AirTouch Cellular, by K. Trafford. (56 pgs.)56
05/03/1999Westside Cellular dba Cellnet's response to the motion of The GTE Entities to quash subpoenas, filed by R. Hart. (6 pgs.)6
04/30/1999Reply brief filed on behalf of respondent, Cincinnati SMSA Limited Partnership, by J. Kelly. (62 pgs.)62
04/30/1999Confidential complainant Westside Cellular dba Cellnet of Ohio's reply brief in support of findings against The Air- Touch Entities, filed by R. Hart. (60 pgs.) (FILED UNDER SEAL)60
04/30/1999Complainant Westside Cellular dba Cellnet of Ohio's reply brief in support of findings against respondent, Cincinnati SMSA Limited Partnership, filed by R. Hart. (34 pgs.)34
04/30/1999Confidential post-hearing reply brief of respondent, New Par dba AirTouch Cellular, filed by K. Trafford. (56 pgs.) (FILED UNDER SEAL)56
04/30/1999Redacted version of complainant Westside Cellular dba Cell- net of Ohio's post-hearing brief in support of findings against respondent Cincinnati SMSA Limited Partnership, filed by R. Hart. (60 pgs.)60
04/30/1999Motion to file under seal complainant Westside Cellular dba Cellnet of Ohio's reply brief in support of findings against The AirTouch Entities, filed by R. Hart. (2 pgs.)2
04/23/1999Supplemental motion of the GTE entities to quash subpoenas and for protective order and request for expedited ruling filed by T. Lodge. (6 pgs)6
04/16/1999Post-hearing initial brief of respondent New Par dba Air- Touch Cellular filed by K. Trafford. (92 pgs.)92
04/15/1999Complainant Westside Cellular dba Cellnet of Ohio's post- hearing brief in support of findings against the AirTouch Entities, filed by R. Hart. (201 pgs.) (FILED UNDER SEAL)201
04/15/1999Complainant Westside Cellular dba Cellnet of Ohio's motion for protective order to file post hearing brief in support of findings against the AirTouch Entities, filed by R. Hart. (3 pgs.)3
04/15/1999Complainant Westside Cellular dba Cellnet of Ohio's post- hearing brief in support of findings against respondent Cincinnati SMSA Limited Partnership aka Ameritech Mobile Communications, filed by R. Hart. (59 pgs.) (FILED UNDER SEAL)59
04/15/1999Complainant Westside Cellular, dba Cellnet of Ohio's motion for protective order to file post hearing brief in support of findings against respondent Cincinnati SMSA Limited Partnership aka Ameritech Mobile Communications, filed by R. Hart. (3 pgs.)3
04/15/1999Initial brief filed on behalf of Cincinnati SMSA Limited Partnership by J. Kelly. (85 pgs.)85
04/15/1999Post hearing initial brief of respondent New Park dba AirTouch Cellular filed by K. Trafford. (95 pgs.) (FILED UNDER SEAL)95
04/15/1999Motion for protective order and memorandum in support filed on behalf of New Par by K. Trafford. (3 pgs.)3
04/13/1999Confidential motion of GTE Entities to quash witness sub- poenas and for protective order with unredacted exhibits, filed by T. Lodge. (23 pgs.) (FILED UNDER SEAL)23
04/13/1999Motion to quash witness subpoenas and for protective order and brief in support filed on behalf of GTE Entities by T. Lodge. (23 pgs.)23
04/13/1999Motion for protective order regarding exhibits to motion of GTE Entities to quash witness subpoenas and for pro- tective order and memorandum in support filed on behalf of GTE Entities by D. Hertlein. (6 pgs.)6
03/30/1999Motion for issuance of subpoenas for Corporate Representatives and Motion of Issuance of Subpoenas Duces Tecum filed on behalf of complainant by R. Hart.8
03/30/1999Motion for issuance of subpoenas duces tecum filed on behalf of complainant by R. Hart.40
03/26/1999Notice to take deposition upon oral examination and subpoena duces Tecum, filed on behalf of complainant by R. Hart.3
03/26/1999Motion for issuance of subpoenas for corporate representative, filed on behalf of complainant by R. Hart.47
03/15/1999Entry ordering that Cellnet's motion for a default judgment is denied; that Cellnet's motion for spoliation of evidence is moot; that Cellnet be granted an additional 60 days to pursue additional discovery in accordance with Finding 16; that GTE Entities cooperate with Cellnet's additional discovery in accordance with Finding 16; that Cellnet and GTE Entities submit the requisite discovery updates in accordance with Finding 16; that Cellnet, AirTouch, and Ameritech submit their briefs in accordance with Finding 18 (AE)12
03/15/1999Transcript filed for hearing held 3/1/99, (JA), 230 pgs., Con't. (Volume XIII) (PUCO-Columbus, OH)230
03/12/1999Affidavit of Mark Cassandra filed.2
03/12/1999Notice of filing of original affidavit filed by D. Hertlein on behalf of GTE entities.3
03/01/1999Confidential Cellnet Exhibit 103 filed. (FILED UNDER SEAL) (1631 pgs.)1631
03/01/1999Confidential Airtouch Exhibit 13; Cellnet Exhibits 208, 209 filed with transcript of hearing held 2/4/99, Volume VII. (FILED UNDER SEAL) (281 pgs.)281
03/01/1999Confidential Airtouch Exhibit 12; Cellnet Exhibits 191, 192, 193, 195, 196, 198, 200, 201, 202, 203, 205, filed with transcript of hearing held 2/3/99, Volume VI. (2 ENVELOPES FILED UNDER SEAL) (1116 pgs.)1116
03/01/1999Confidential Cellnet Exhibits 114, 141, 142, 147, 150, 151, 152, 153, 154, 155, 157, 187, 188, 189, 190; Airtouch Ex- hibits 9, 10, 11, filed with transcript of hearing held 2/2/99, Volume V. (2 ENVELOPES/FILED UNDER SEAL) (386 pgs.)386
03/01/1999Exhibits filed with transcript of hearing held 2/2/99, Volume V. (611 pgs.)611
03/01/1999Transcript filed for hearing held 2/10/99, (JA), 98 pgs., Con't. (Volume XI) (PUCO-Columbus, OH)98
03/01/1999Transcript filed for hearing held 2/4/99, (JA), 91 pgs., Con't. (Volume VII) (PUCO-Columbus, OH)91
02/25/1999Memorandum of the GTE in opposition of complainant Cellnet's supplemental memorandum in support of Cellnet's motion for: 1) default judgement, or in the alternative, bifurcation and continuation of the GTE case; and 2) leave to amend its complaint as to the GTE Entities to include claims of spoliation of evidence, filed by T. Lodge.26
02/25/1999Transcript filed for hearing held 2/11/99, (JA), 146 pgs., Con't. (Volume XII) (PUCO-Columbus, OH)146
02/25/1999Transcript filed for hearing held 2/9/99, (JA), 134 pgs., Con't. (Volume X) (PUCO-Columbus, OH)134
02/25/1999Transcript filed for hearing held 2/8/99, (JA), 70 pgs., Con't. (Volume IX) (PUCO-Columbus, OH)70
02/25/1999Confidential Cellnet Exhibit 210 filed with transcript of hearing held 2/5/99, Volume VIII. (3 pgs.) (FILED UNDER SEAL)3
02/25/1999Transcript filed for hearing held 2/5/99, (JA), 119 pgs., Con't. (Volume VIII) (PUCO-Columbus, OH)119
02/24/1999Notice of filing original affidavit of Michael Tricarichi filed on behalf of complainant by R. Hart.6
02/24/1999Rebuttal testimony of Dalann Martin filed on behalf of New Par by K. Trafford.10
02/22/1999Supplemental memorandum in support of Cellnet's motion for: 1) default judgment or, in the alternative, bifurcation and continuation of the GTE case; and 2) leave to amend its com- plaint as to the GTE Entities to include claims of spolia- tion of evidence filed on behalf of Cellnet by M. Tricari- chi. (23 pgs.)23
02/22/1999Entry ordering that AirTouch's motion to file rebuttal testimony is granted pursuant to Finding 3; that Cellnet and Cincinnati SMSA shall be afforded the opportunity to submit rebuttal testimony to be filed by February 24, 1999; that all expert rebuttal testimony shall be filed with the Commission by February 24, 1999 (AE)2
02/22/1999Supplemental memorandum in support of Cellnet's motions filed on behalf of complainants by R. Hart.22
02/17/1999Transcript of hearing held 2/3/99, (JA) (DN), 211 pgs., Con't. (Volume VI) (PUCO-Columbus, OH)211
02/16/1999Transcript of hearing held 2/2/99, (JA), 189 pgs., Con't. (Volume V) (PUCO-Columbus, OH)193
02/16/1999Transcript of hearing held 2/1/99, (JA), 313 pgs., Con't. (Volume IV) (PUCO-Columbus, OH)313
02/11/1999Entry ordering that the joint motion to dismiss be granted with prejudice.2
02/10/1999Confidential Cellnet Exhibit No. 40 filed with transcript of hearing held 1/28/99, Volume III. (FILED UNDER SEAL)12414
02/10/1999Confidential Cellnet Exhibits Nos. 42, 43, 44, 45, and 46 filed with transcript of hearing held 1/28/99, Volume III. (127 pgs.) (FILED UNDER SEAL)127
02/10/1999Transcript filed for hearing held 1/28/99, (JA), 78 pgs., Con't. (Volume III) (PUCO-Columbus, OH)78
02/10/1999Motion for leave to present supplemental or rebuttal testimony in response to the expert testimony of Robert Ferguson, filed on behalf of New Par by K. Trafford.19
02/10/1999Confidential Ameritech Exhibit No. 8 filed with transcript of hearing held 1/27/99, Volume II. (46 pgs.) (FILED UNDER SEAL)46
02/10/1999Confidential Ameritech Exhibit No. 7 filed with transcript of hearing held 1/27/99, Volume II. (10 pgs.) (FILED UNDER SEAL)10
02/10/1999Confidential portion of transcript filed for hearing held 1/27/99, Volume II. (7 pgs.) (FILED UNDER SEAL)7
02/10/1999Transcript filed for hearing held 1/27/99, (JA) (DN), 134 pgs., Con't. (Volume II) (PUCO-Columbus, OH)134
02/09/1999Confidential Cellnet Exhibit #5 filed with transcript of hearing held 1/26/99, Volume I. (43 pgs.) (FILED UNDER SEAL)43
02/09/1999Transcript filed for hearing held 1/26/99, (JA) (DN), 191 pgs., Con't. (PUCO-Columbus, OH) (Volume I)191
02/04/1999Reply in support of Cellnet's motions, filed on behalf of complainants by R. Hart.36
02/03/1999Stipulation regarding exclusive reseller rate plans filed on behalf of complainant by R. Hart; and respondent, New Par, by K. Trafford.5
02/01/1999Memorandum of the GTE Entities in opposition to complainant Cellnet's motion for default judgment against GTE, or in the alternative, bifurcation and continuation of the GTE case; and leave to amend its complaint to include claims of spoliation of evidence regarding this case; filed by D. Hertlein.149
02/01/1999Reply brief in support of its motion to file supplemental expert testimony, filed on behalf of complainant by R. Hart.3
02/01/1999Memorandum in opposition to the GTE Entities' interlocutory appeal, filed on behalf of complainant by R. Hart.2
01/29/1999Confidential deposition transcript of J. Barcley Knapp taken August 17, 1994, filed on behalf of complainant by R. Hart. (130 pgs.) (FILED UNDER SEAL)130
01/29/1999Confidential deposition transcript of Dal Ann Martin taken December 8, 1998, filed on behalf of complainant by R. Hart. (184 pgs.) (FILED UNDER SEAL)184
01/28/1999Motion for leave to file attached supplemental expert testimony, filed on behalf of complainant by R. Hart.3
01/28/1999New Par's memorandum in opposition to filing of supplemental expert testimony by complainant or in the alternative motion to strike supplemental expert testimony of Robert Ferguson, filed by K. Trafford.29
01/27/1999Correspondence dated January 27, 1999, to Jay Agranoff, PUCO staff, in response to the request of the designation of the three corporate representatives by GTE Entities, filed by T. Lodge.1
01/27/1999Correspondence letter dated January 27, 1999, to Jay Agranoff, PUCO staff, confirming the designation of the representatives of Cincinnati SMSA Limited Partnership at the hearings, filed by J. Kelly.1
01/27/1999New Par's designation of party representatives, filed by K. Trafford.2
01/27/1999Notice of client representative filed on behalf of Cellnet by R. Hart.2
01/27/1999Joint motion to dismiss and memorandum in support filed on behalf of complainant by R. Hart; and Sygnet Communications by S. Howard.4
01/27/1999Subpoena served upon R. DiTomas filed by R. Hart.5
01/27/1999Subpoena of The Kassouf Company filed by R. Hart.5
01/27/1999Application for interlocutory review of order granting motion for issuance of subpoenas or alternatively motion to quash and memorandum in support filed on behalf of respondents by T. Lodge.31
01/27/1999Joint motion to dismiss and memorandum in support filed on behalf of complainant by R. Hart; and Sygnet Communications by S. Howard. (4 pgs.)4
01/27/1999Index of exhibits in support of memorandum in support of: 1) Cellnet's motion for default judgment or, in the alter- native, bifurcation and continuation of the GTE case; and 2) Cellnet's motion for leave to amend its complaint as to the GTE Entities to include claims of spoliation of evidence filed. (645 pgs.) (FILED 1/25/99 UNDER SEAL)645
01/26/1999Subpoena issued to The Kassouf Company, filed. (5 pgs.)5
01/26/1999Redacted Supplemental Report filed on behalf of Lanquist Avery MacDonald Baskerville Company by Gail Ofir.37
01/26/1999Motion for 1) Default judgment against GTE or, in the alternative, Bifurcation and continuation of the GTE case; 2) Leave to amend its complaint as to the GTE entities to include claims of spoliation of evidence, filed on behalf of Cellnet by R. Hart.3
01/26/1999Motion to file under seal Cellnet's motion for default judgement against GTE and accompanying memorandum and support documents by R. Hart.2
01/25/1999Confidential document filed on behalf of complainant by R. Hart continued. (FILED UNDER SEAL) (Part 3 of 3)240
01/25/1999Confidential information filed on behalf of complaint by R. Hart continued. (FILED UNDER SEAL) (Part 2 of 3)202
01/25/1999Confidential motion to file under seal Cellnet's motion for default judgment against GTE and accompanying memorandum and supporting documents, filed on behalf of complainant by R. Hart. (FILED UNDER SEAL) (Part 1 of 3)202
01/25/1999Supplemental expert testimony of Robert Ferguson filed by R. Hart. (57 pgs) (FILED UNDER SEAL)57
01/25/1999Memorandum in support of motion for 1) Default judgment or, in the alternative, bifurcation and continuation of the GTE case; and 2) leave to amend its complaint as the the GTE entities to include claims of spoliation of evidence, filed on behalf of Cellnet by R. Hart.26
01/25/1999Motion to file under seal supplemental expert testimony of R. Ferguson filed by R. Hart.2
01/25/1999Copy of letter received by facsimile from Pam Miller at CoreComm, filed on behalf of complainants by R. Hart.2
01/25/1999Updated exhibit lists for Ameritech and AirTouch filed by R. Hart. (4 pgs)4
01/22/1999Subpoena issued for Kimberly Liston, filed. (2 pgs.)2
01/22/1999Pages 5, 6, and 7 of the redacted testimony of Nancy Behrend and page 73 from Gary Fleming's testimony which was omitted from the original filing, submitted by D. Hertlein.6
01/22/1999Motion for thirty (30) minute enlargement of time to file expert testimony filed on behalf of complainant by R. Hart.4
01/22/1999Notice of filing of deposition transcript filed on behalf of respondents by T. Lodge.3
01/22/1999Motion for issuance of subpoenas for Anthony Schrader filed on behalf of Westside Cellular dba Cellnet. by R. Hart.5
01/22/1999Updated exhibit list filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by R. Hart.4
01/22/1999Entry ordering that Cellnet's motion for the issuance of subpoenas is granted; that Cellnet and GTE jointly submit the schedule of witnesses in this portion of the proceeding; that Cellnet submit new subpoenas. (AE)3
01/22/1999Subpoena issued for J. Barcely Knapp c/o Pam Miller (issued on 1/20/99) filed.2
01/22/1999Copy of subpoena to Greg Gorelick c/o Pam Miller filed by J. Agranoff, PUCO staff.2
01/22/1999Copy of subpoena to Leigh Wood c/o Pam Miller filed by J. Agranoff, PUCO staff.2
01/22/1999Copy of subpoena to Kimberly Liston c/o Pam Miller, filed by J. Agranoff, PUCO staff.2
01/21/1999Motion for protective order regarding prefiled testimony of Nancy Behrend filed by T. Lodge.5
01/21/1999Confidential deposition transcript of Greg Gorelick taken September 1, 1998, filed on behalf of complainant by R. Hart. (188 pgs.) (FILED UNDER SEAL)188
01/21/1999Confidential deposition transcript of Diane Koskey taken August 18, 1998, filed on behalf of complainant by R. Hart. (78 pgs.) (FILED UNDER SEAL)78
01/21/1999Deposition of Seamus Hyland filed.175
01/21/1999Confidential deposition transcript of Robert F. Williams taken January 5, 1994, filed on behalf of complainant by R. Hart. (96 pgs.) (FILED UNDER SEAL)96
01/21/1999Deposition of Raymond Gross filed.99
01/21/1999Confidential deposition transcript of Anthony Schrader taken February 8, 1995, filed on behalf of complainant by R. Hart. (37 pgs.) (FILED UNDER SEAL)37
01/21/1999Confidential deposition transcript of Robert G. Zicker taken December 17, 1998, filed on behalf of complainant by R. Hart. (38 pgs.) (FILED UNDER SEAL)38
01/21/1999Confidential deposition transcript of Michael Yoder taken December 8, 1998, filed on behalf of complainant by R. Hart. (69 pgs.) (FILED UNDER SEAL)69
01/21/1999Confidential deposition transcript of Leigh Wood taken August 7, 1998, filed on behalf of complainant by R. Hart. (163 pgs.) (FILED UNDER SEAL)163
01/21/1999Confidential deposition transcript of Gilbert Wolf taken May 18, 1998, filed on behalf of complainant by R. Hart. (343 pgs.) (FILED UNDER SEAL)343
01/21/1999Confidential deposition transcript of Douglas Van Scoy taken April 2, 1997, filed on behalf of complainant by R. Hart. (45 pgs.) (FILED UNDER SEAL)45
01/21/1999Confidential deposition transcript of Raymond Gross taken January 15, 1993, filed on behalf of complainant by R. Hart. (99 pgs.) (FILED UNDER SEAL)99
01/21/1999Confidential deposition transcript of Seamus Hyland taken January 7, 1994, filed on behalf of complainant by R. Hart. (175 pgs.) (FILED UNDER SEAL)175
01/21/1999Confidential deposition transcript of David Shanks taken December 22, 1998, filed on behalf of complainant by R. Hart. (75 pgs.) (FILED UNDER SEAL)75
01/21/1999Confidential deposition transcript of Jack Roettenberger taken August 18, 1998, filed on behalf of complainant by R. Hart. (48 pgs.) (FILED UNDER SEAL)48
01/21/1999Confidential deposition transcript of Karen Potocki taken October 6, 1994, filed on behalf of complainant by R. Hart. (102 pgs.) (FILED UNDER SEAL)102
01/21/1999Confidential deposition transcript of Alan Pearce taken April 4, 1997, filed on behalf of complainant by R. Hart. (60 pgs.) (FILED UNDER SEAL)60
01/21/1999Confidential deposition transcript of Daniel S. Mead taken December 17, 1998, filed on behalf of complainant by R. Hart. (142 pgs.) (FILED UNDER SEAL)142
01/21/1999Confidential deposition transcript of Kimberly Liston taken March 14, 1997, filed on behalf of complainant by R. Hart. (103 pgs.) (FILED UNDER SEAL)103
01/21/1999Confidential deposition transcript of Mark F.A. Kearns taken December 16, 1998, filed on behalf of complainant by R. Hart. (132 pgs.) (FILED UNDER SEAL)132
01/21/1999Confidential deposition transcript of Michael Franz taken December 15, 1998, filed on behalf of complainant by R. Hart. (33 pgs.) (FILED UNDER SEAL)33
01/21/1999Confidential deposition transcript of Michael Franz taken October 6, 1994, filed on behalf of complainant by R. Hart. (306 pgs.) (FILED UNDER SEAL)306
01/21/1999Confidential deposition transcript of Philip L. Forbes taken December 18, 1998, filed on behalf of complainant by R. Hart. (103 pgs.) (FILED UNDER SEAL)103
01/21/1999Confidential deposition of Gary Fleming taken March 31, 1995, filed on behalf of complainant by R. Hart. (36 pgs.) (FILED UNDER SEAL)36
01/21/1999Confidential deposition transcript of Gary Fleming taken September 11, 1998, filed on behalf of complainant by R. Hart. (155 pgs.) (FILED UNDER SEAL)155
01/21/1999Confidential deposition of Alan Ferber taken December 17, 1998, filed on behalf of complainant by R. Hart. (44 pgs.) (FILED UNDER SEAL)44
01/21/1999Confidential deposition transcript of Mark Feighner taken December 18, 1998, filed on behalf of complainant by R. Hart. (101 pgs.) (FILED UNDER SEAL)101
01/21/1999Confidential deposition transcript of Jay Ellison taken February 8, 1995, filed on behalf of complainant by R. Hart. (90 pgs.) (FILED UNDER SEAL)90
01/21/1999Confidential deposition transcript of Raymond DiTomas taken January 5, 1994, filed on behalf of complainant by R. Hart. (199 pgs.) (FILED UNDER SEAL)199
01/21/1999Confidential deposition transcript of Peter J. Coules taken December 16, 1998, filed on behalf of complainant by R. Hart. (200 pgs.) (FILED UNDER SEAL)200
01/21/1999Confidential deposition transcript of Penny Burlison taken January 5, 1994, filed on behalf of complainant by R. Hart. (66 pgs.) (FILED UNDER SEAL)66
01/21/1999Confidential deposition transcript of John Cagnina taken December 10, 1998, filed on behalf of complainant by R. Hart. (104 pgs.) (FILED UNDER SEAL)104
01/21/1999Confidential deposition transcript of Patrick Bennett taken December 22, 1998, filed on behalf of complainant by R. Hart. (145 pgs.) (FILED UNDER SEAL)145
01/21/1999Deposition transcript of Patrick Bennett taken September 23, 1998, filed on behalf of complainant by R. Hart. (327 pgs.) (FILED UNDER SEAL)327
01/21/1999Confidential Exhibits 2 & 4-5 to the prefiled testimony of Patrick J. Bennett filed on behalf of respondent, New Par. (65 pgs.) (FILED UNDER SEAL)65
01/21/1999Confidential Exhibits 2-3 & 5-10 to the prefiled testimony of David A. Shanks, filed on behalf of respondent, New Par. (102 pgs.) (FILED UNDER SEAL)102
01/21/1999Confidential submission of prefiled testimony of Nancy Behrend filed on behalf of respondents by T. Lodge. (13 pgs.) (FILED UNDER SEAL)13
01/21/1999Submission of confidential prefiled testimony of Peter Coules filed on behalf of respondents by T. Lodge. (11 pgs.) (FILED UNDER SEAL)11
01/21/1999Confidential expert testimony of Robert Ferguson filed on behalf of complainant by R. Hart. (124 pgs.) (FILED UNDER SEAL)124
01/21/1999Testimony of David A. Shanks filed on behalf of respondent, New Par. (72 pgs.)72
01/21/1999Motion for protective order and memorandum in support filed on behalf of respondent, New Par, by K. Trafford.8
01/21/1999Confidential deposition transcript of Terry Tindel taken February 18, 1998, filed on behalf of complainant by R. Hart. (122 pgs.) (FILED UNDER SEAL)122
01/21/1999Confidential deposition transcript of Greg Gorelick taken October 20, 1994, filed on behalf of complainant by R. Hart. (137 pgs.) (FILED UNDER SEAL)137
01/21/1999Confidential deposition transcript of Greg Gorelick taken September 1, 1998, filed on behalf of complainant by R. Hart. (190 pgs.) (FILED UNDER SEAL)190
01/21/1999Confidential deposition transcript of Seamus Hyland taken October 5, 1998, filed on behalf of complainant by R. Hart. (204 pgs.) (FILED UNDER SEAL)204
01/21/1999Confidential deposition transcript of Gilbert Wolf taken December 11, 1998, filed on behalf of complainant by R. Hart. (32 pgs.) (FILED UNDER SEAL)32
01/21/1999Testimony of Roger D. Blackwell, Ph.D, filed on behalf of respondents.31
01/21/1999Testimony of Patrick J. Bennett filed on behalf of respondent, New Par.37
01/21/1999Notice of filing deposition transcripts and motion to file transcripts under seal, filed on behalf of complainant by R. Hart.3
01/21/1999Motion for protective order regarding prefiled testimony of Peter Coules and memorandum in support filed on behalf of respondents by T. Lodge.5
01/21/1999Oral deposition of Gary Fleming taken September 11, 1998 filed.153
01/21/1999Redacted submission of prefiled testimony of Nancy Behrend filed on behalf of respondents by T. Lodge.12
01/21/1999Motion for issuance of subpoena for Bernie Fernandez filed on behalf of complainant by R. Hart.4
01/21/1999Motion for leave to file the expert testimony of Robert Ferguson under seal filed on behalf of complainants by R. Hart.2
01/21/1999Submission of prefiled testimony of Mark Kearns, filed on behalf of respondents by T. Lodge.7
01/21/1999Notice of filing deposition transcripts and motion to file deposition transcripts under seal, filed on behalf of complainants by R. Hart.4
01/21/1999Redacted submission of prefiled testimony of Peter Coules filed on behalf of GTE Mobilnet et al by T. Lodge.12
01/21/1999Certificate of service of prefiled testimony, filed on behalf of New Par by K. Trafford.2
01/21/1999Copy of subpoena to Bernie Fernandez filed by J. Agranoff, PUCO staff.2
01/21/1999Motion to file deposition transcripts under seal, filed on behalf of complainant by R. Hart. (4 pgs.)4
01/20/1999Motion for issuance of subpoena for Ray DiTomas filed on behalf of complainant by R. Hart.4
01/20/1999Letter stating that Mr. Ray DiTomas will now be added to the AirTouch schedule, filed by R. Hart.1
01/20/1999Motion for issuance of subpoenas for CoreComm witnesses filed on behalf of complainant by R. Hart.7
01/20/1999Subpoena to Lane Aviation filed.3
01/20/1999Motion for issuance of subpoenas for CoreComm witnesses filed on behalf of complainant by R. Hart. (7 pgs.)7
01/19/1999Motion for issuance of subpoena for Kimberley Liston, filed on behalf of complainant by R. Hart.4
01/19/1999Motion for issuance of subpoenas for Lane Aviation witnesses, filed on behalf of complainant by R. Hart.4
01/19/1999Motion for issuance of subpoenas for Anthony Schrader filed on behalf of complainant by R. Hart.4
01/19/1999Motion for issuance of subpoenas for Kassouf Company witnesses, filed on behalf of complainants by R. Hart.4
01/19/1999Letter to Attorney Jay Agranoff regarding the schedule of witnesses, filed on behalf of complainant by R. Hart.1
01/19/1999Motion for issuance of subpoena for Bernie Fernandez, filed on behalf of complainant by R. Hart.4
01/19/1999Correspondence letter to Jon F. Kelly dated January 19, 1999, regarding the subpoenaing of witnesses, filed on behalf of complainant by R. Hart.1
01/19/1999Copy of subpoena to Bernie Fernandez filed by J. Agranoff, PUCO staff.2
01/15/1999Correspondence letter dated January 15, 1999, regarding the schedule for the hearing, filed on behalf of complainant by R. Hart.1
01/15/1999Westside Cellular dba Cellnet's reply to memorandum opposing motion for issuance of subpoenas for GTE witnesses, or alternatively, motion to quash subpoenas, filed by R. Hart.5
01/13/1999Exhibit list filed on behalf of respondents, GTE Entities, by T. Lodge.5
01/13/1999Witness list of the GTE Entities, filed by T. Lodge.4
01/13/1999Supplemental memorandum opposing motion for issuance of subpoenas witnesses or alternatively, motion to quash, filed by T. Lodge.5
01/12/1999Memorandum opposing motion for issuance of subpoenas for GTE witness or, alternatively, motion to quash subpoenas, filed on behalf of respondents by T. Lodge.6
01/12/1999Correspondence letter to Mark Griffin dated January 8, 1999, filed on behalf of respondent by J. Niehaus.1
01/12/1999Letter withdrawing the application of The GTE Entities for interlocutory appeal review order granting motion to compel further deposition of Mark Feighner, filed by T. Lodge.1
01/12/1999Entry ordering that Cellnet's motion for additional time to submit the supplemental testimony is granted in part and denied in part; that the hearing be rescheduled to begin on January 26, 1999, at 10:00 a.m. (AE)2
01/11/1999Notice to take deposition upon oral examination filed on behalf of complainant by M. Griffin.13
01/11/1999Correspondence dated January 8, 1999, to James Niehaus regarding deposition, filed on behalf of complainants by M. Griffin.11
01/11/1999Response to complainants motion to permit the filing of supplemental expert testimony, filed on behalf of New Par by K. Trafford.24
01/08/1999Letter to Mark Griffin dated January 7, 1999, in response to his request of December 30, 1998, filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by J. Kelly.2
01/08/1999Memorandum of the GTE Entities and response to motion of complainant to permit the filing of expert testimony regarding respondent GTE Entities within a reasonable period after the GTE Entities of completed discovery production, filed on behalf of respondents by T. Lodge.4
01/08/1999Application of the GTE Entities for interlocutory review of order granting motion to compel further deposition of Mark Feighner, filed by T. Lodge.46
01/07/1999Motion for issuance of subpoenas for Anthony Schrader filed by R. Hart.4
01/07/1999Letter to T. Lodge in regards to letter requesting the Commission strike our reply memorandum in support, filed by M. Griffin.1
01/07/1999Reponse to M. Griffin in regards to letter of January 6, 1999 regarding D. Glenn's deposition, filed by J. Niehaus.1
01/07/1999Motion for issuance of subpoenas for AirTouch witness filed on behalf of complainant by R. Hart.15
01/07/1999Entry ordering that Cellnet's motions to compel are granted in part and denied in part; that Cellnet and GTE Entities are to comply with the designated time frames and conditions relative to conducting discovery (JA)6
01/07/1999Correspondence dated January 6, 1999, to Mark Griffin, regarding the rescheduling of David Glenn's deposition, filed on behalf of respondent by J. Niehaus.1
01/07/1999Motion for issuance of subpoenas for Lane Aviation witnesses, filed on behalf of complainant by R. Hart.4
01/07/1999Motion for issuance of subpoenas for Ameritech Witnesses, filed on behalf of complainant by R. Hart.7
01/07/1999Correspondence to Jay Agranoff in response to request for a supplemental to the submission to Paul Duffy, on January 6, 1999, filed on behalf of GTE Wireless by J. Niehaus.2
01/07/1999Correspondence letter to Jay Agranoff in response to request for a supplemental to the submission to P. Duffy, on January 6, 1999 filed on behalf of GTE Wireless by J. Niehaus.4
01/07/1999Motion for issuance of subpoenas for Lane Aviation witnesses filed on behalf of complainant by R. Hart. (4 pgs.)4
01/07/1999Letter to T. Lodge, filed on behalf of complainant by M. Griffin.1
01/07/1999Letter of M. Griffin, filed on behalf of respondents by J. Niehaus.1
01/07/1999Motion for issuance of subpoenas for GTE Witnesses filed on behalf of complainant by R. Hart.15
01/07/1999Letter to the reply memorandum in support of Cellnet's fifth motion to compel discovery from GTE and motion for sanctions, filed on behalf of respondent by T. Lodge.2
01/07/1999Entry ordering that Cellnet's motions to compel are granted in part and denied in part; that Cellnet and GTE Entities are to comply with the designated time frames and conditions relative to conducting discovery. (AE)6
01/06/1999Correspondence dated January 6, 1999, to James Niehaus regarding David Glenn's deposition, filed on behalf of complainant by M. Griffin2
01/06/1999Reply memorandum in support of Cellnet's fifth motion to compel discovery from GTE and motion for sanctions filed on behalf of complainant by R. Hart.11
01/06/1999Correspondence dated January 6, 1999, to Mark Griffin , filed on behalf of respondent by J. Niehaus.1
01/06/1999Correspondence dated January 6, 1999, to James Niehaus regarding David Glenn's deposition, filed on behalf of complainant by M. Griffin.2
01/06/1999Reply memorandum in support of fifth motion to compel discovery from GTE and motion for sanctions, filed on behalf of complainants by R. Hart.11
01/06/1999Letter to M. Griffin on behalf of respondents by J. Niehaus.1
01/05/1999Response letter to M. Griffin regarding depositions filed by J. Niehaus.2
01/05/1999Notice to take deposition upon oral examination and subpoena duces tecum filed on behalf of complainant, by R. Hart.2
01/05/1999 Correspondence dated January 4, 1999, to Mark Griffin, in reply to his letter dated January 4, 1999, filed on behalf of respondent, by J. Niehaus.2
01/05/1999Memorandum of the GTE Entities in opposition to motion to compel and motion for sanctions of December 31, 1998, filed by T. Lodge.6
01/05/1999Correspondence dated January 4, 1999, to Mark Griffin, in reply to his letter dated January 4, 1999, filed on behalf of respondent, by J. Niehaus.2
01/05/1999Notice to take deposition upon oral examination and subpoena duces tecum filed by M. Griffin.3
01/05/1999Letter to M. Griffin, reply to letter of December 31, 1998, filed on behalf of respondents by J. Niehaus.2
01/04/1999Missing GTE Discovery filed by m. Griffin.6
01/04/1999Letter to J. Niehaus from M. Griffin.4
01/04/1999Letter to J. Niehaus from M. Griffin.6
01/04/1999Correspondence dated December 22, 1998, to James B. Niehaus, filed on behalf of complainant by M. Griffin. (6 pgs.)6
01/04/1999Letter to J. Niehaus, filed on behalf of complainants by M. Griffin.5
12/31/1998Supplemental filing of exhibits to fifth motion to compel discovery from GTE and motion for sanctions against GTE, filed on behalf of Cellnet by M. Griffin.35
12/31/1998Notice to take deposition upon oral examination filed by R. Hart.5
12/31/1998Complainant Cellnet's motion to compel the deposition of Linda Libra, motion for sanctions and request for expedited ruling filed by R. Hart.10
12/31/1998Correspondence letter to James Niehaus and Thomas Lodge with attached notice of deposition for Mr. Glenn, filed on behalf of complainant by M. Griffin.5
12/31/1998Supplemental filing of exhibits to complainant Cellnet's fifth motion to compel discovery from GTE and motion for sanctions against GTE, filed by M. Griffin. (38 pgs.)38
12/30/1998Reponse to Commissions Entry of December 30, 1998, involving deposition of David Glenn and Mr. Kearns filed on by T. Lodge.1
12/30/1998Memorandum of the GTE entities in opposition to motion to compel and motion for sanctions of December 24, 1998, filed by T. Lodge.13
12/30/1998Entry ordering that GTE Entities' interlocutory appeal be granted in part and denied in part, as set forth in this entry.3
12/30/1998Memorandum of the GTE Entities in opposition to motion to compel and motion for sanctions of December 24, 1998 filed by T. Lodge.13
12/30/1998Entry ordering that GTE Entities' interlocutory appeal be granted in part and denied in part, as set forth in this entry.3
12/30/1998Response to Commission's entry of December 30, 1998, filed on behalf of respondent by T. Lodge.1
12/29/1998Information filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by S. Rawlings.3
12/29/1998Letter to Randy Hart as a follow-up to the items mentioned in his letter dated December 1, 1998, filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio by C. Rawlings.3
12/28/1998Correspondence letter to Randy Hart dated December 24, 1998, filed on behalf of respondent by J. Niehaus.5
12/28/1998Correspondence letter dated December 24, 1998 to Randy Hart, filed by J. Niehaus.1
12/24/1998Complainant Cellnet's fifth motion to compel discovery from GTE and motions for sanctions against GTE, filed by R. Hart.19
12/24/1998Correspondence to Mark Griffin dated December 24, 1998, filed on behalf of respondent by J. Niehaus.1
12/24/1998Correspondence to Mark Griffin in reply to his letter dated December 23 ,1998, filed on behalf of respondent by J. Niehaus.4
12/24/1998Complainants Cellnet's fifth motion to compel discovery from GTE and motions for sanctions against GTE, filed by R. Hart.3
12/24/1998Correspondence dated December 23, 1998, in reply to Mark Griffin's letter dated December 22, 1998, filed on behalf of respondent by J. Niehaus.2
12/24/1998Letter to M. Griffin, filed on behalf of respondents by J. Niehaus.1
12/24/1998Entry ordering that Cellnet's motion for enlargement of time is denied in accordance with Finding 3 (AE)2
12/24/1998Correspondence letter dated December 22, 1998 to Randy J. Hart filed by J. Niehaus.2
12/24/1998Entry denying Cellnet's motion for enlargement of time. (AE)2
12/22/1998Notice to take deposition upon oral examination of the following persons, filed on behalf of complainant by M. Griffin: (16 pgs.) 1. Dan Mead 2. Peter Coules 3. Mark Kearns 4. Mark Feighner 5. Phillip Forbes16
12/22/1998Notice to take deposition upon oral examination of the following persons, filed on behalf of complainant by M. Griffin: 1) Dan Mead 2) Peter Coules 3) Mark Kearns 4) Mark Feighners 5) Philllip Forbes.16
12/21/1998Submission of omitted attachment filed on behalf of respondents by t. Lodge.6
12/18/1998Application of the GTE Entities and Joanna Patterson for interlocutory review of order denying motion to quash subpoena and for protective order and memorandum in support filed by T. Lodge.12
12/18/1998Entry ordering that an expedited ruling is granted in accordance with Finding 3; that the motion to quash and for protective order is denied in accordance with Finding 5.(JJ).3
12/17/1998Notice of filing original affidavit, filed on behalf of complainant by M. Griffin.5
12/17/1998Motion to quash subpoena and for protective order and request for expedited ruling, filed on behalf of GTE Entities and JoAnna Patterson by T. Lodge.12
12/15/1998Motion for issuance of subpoena duces tecum, filed on behalf of complainant by R. Hart.4
12/14/1998New Par's response to complainant's motion for enlargement of time to file expert report filed by K. Trafford.3
12/11/1998Complainant Westside Cellular dba Cellnet's motion for enlargement of time to file expert report filed by R. Hart. 11
12/03/1998Supplemental filing of exhibits to complainant Cellnet's fifth motion to compel discovery from GTE and motion for sanctions against GTE filed by M. Griffin.35
12/03/1998Entry scheduling a hearing at 10:00 a.m. on January 19, 1999, and a final prehearing conference at 10:00 a.m. on January 13, 1999, both at the Commission offices; that any party intending to present direct expert testimony do so in accordance with Finding 3.(AE)2
12/01/1998Motion for issuance of subpoena for Teresa A. Earley, filed on behalf of complainant by R. Hart.4
11/19/1998Entry ordering that Cellnet's motion for leave to file a surrreply is denied; that the interlocutory appeal of GTE Moblinet is denied as set forth in this entry; that the interlocutory appeal of Cellnet is granted in part and denied in part; to the extent that it granted, GTE Mobilnet is directed to respond to Cellnet's interrogatories in accordance with Finding 8. 11
11/17/1998Notice of withdrawal of interrogatory No. 16 from the March 4, 1998 interrogatories and request for production of documents, filed on behalf of Westside Cellular dba Cellnet by R. Hart.2
10/27/1998Westside Cellular Inc., dba Cellnet's motion for leave to file sur reply to memorandum of the GTE Entities in opposition to Cellnet's application for interlocutory review, filed by R. Hart.4
10/23/1998Additional information filed on behalf of respondent, GTE Wireless, by J. Niehaus.2
10/20/1998Westside Cellular dba Cellnet's reply in opposition to the GTE Entities' application for interlocutory review of attorney examiner's October 7, 1998 entry, filed by R. Hart.5
10/19/1998Memorandum of the GTE entities in opposition to Cellnet's application for interlocutory review of 10/7/98 entry filed by T. Lodge.6
10/15/1998Letter stating that pursuant to the October 7, 1998 entry, GTE Wireless is identifing Robert Zicker as the individual to be deposed regarding the technological aspects to Tele- Go, filed by J. Niehaus. (1 pg.)1
10/15/1998Letter stating that pursuant to the October 7, 1998 entry , GTE Wireless is identifying Robert Zicker as the individual to be deposed regarding the technological aspects to Tele-Go, filed by J. Niehaus.1
10/07/1998Entry ordering that GTE Mobilnet Entities motion to dismiss is denied.20
10/07/1998Entry ordering that GTE Mobilnet Entities motion to dismiss is denied, that Cellnet's motion to compel discovery is granted in part and denied in part, that GTE Mobilnet Entities should provide Cellnet with the requisite discovery responses within two weeks of this entry, that Cellnet should submit its clarification to its motion to compel discovery within two business days as required, that Cellnet's motion for sanctions is denied, that GTE Mobilnet Entities motion for a protective order is granted in part and denied in part, that GTE respondents motion to compel discovery is granted in part and denied in part, that Cellnet should provide GTE Mobilnet Enties with the requisite discovery responses within two weeks of this entry, that the parties provide the Commission deponent list and deposition schedules .(JA) 20
09/29/1998Letter to Mr. Niehaus, filed by R. Hart.2
09/29/1998Letter filed on behalf of Westside Cellular dba Cellnet by R. Hart.2
09/29/1998Letter to J. Niehaus, Esq., filed on behalf of complainants by R. Hart.2
09/24/1998Letter confirming GTE Mobilnet would like to move forward to complete discovery, filed by J. Nichaus.1
09/24/1998Letter to R. Hart filed on behalf of respondents by J. Niehaus.1
08/27/1998Reply memorandum in support of the GTE Entities for protective order and reply memorandum in support of Motion of the GTE Entities to compel responses to discovery, by T. Lodge.11
08/25/1998Motion for enlargement of time to respond to requests for admission with request for expedited ruling filed on behalf of New Par dba AirTouch Cellular by K. Trafford.3
08/24/1998Memorandum contra the motion of the GTE Entities for protective order, filed on behalf of complainant by R. Hart.7
08/24/1998Memorandum contra the motion of the GTE Entities to compel responses to discovery, filed on behalf of complainant by R. Hart.9
08/24/1998Memorandum contra to the motion of the GTE Entities to compel responses to discovery, filed on behalf of complainant by R. Hart.9
08/20/1998Reply memorandum in support of motion to dismiss, filed on behalf of the GTE Entities by T. Lodge.4
08/20/1998Motion for protective order, filed on behalf of respondents by T. Lodge.18
08/20/1998Motion to compel responses to discovery, filed on behalf of GTE Entities by T.Lodge.24
08/14/1998Reply in support of its first motion to compel discovery from GTE Mobilnet of Ohio, GTE Mobilnet of Cleveland, and Ohio RSA # 3 LP and motion for sanctions against GTE Mobilnet filed on behalf of complainant by R. Hart.8
08/14/1998Memorandum contra motion of the GTE Entities to dismiss, filed on behalf of complainant by R. Hart.21
08/14/1998Memorandum contra motion of the GTE Entities to dismiss, filed on behalf of complainants, Cellnet by R. Hart.21
08/14/1998Reply in support of its first motion to compel discovery from GTE Mobilnet of Ohio LP, GTE Mobilnet of Cleveland, Inc. and Ohio RSA #3 LP and Motion for sanctions against GTE Mobilnet, Inc., filed on behalf of applicants by R. Hart.8
08/14/1998Memorandum contra motion of the GTE Entities to dismiss, filed on behalf of complainant by R. Hart.21
08/13/1998Exhibit A to the memorandum of the GTE Entities in opposition to motion to compel of August 5, 1998, which was inadvertently omitted from the filing by T. Lodge. 4
08/13/1998Exhibit A, to the memorandum of the GTE Entities in opposition to motion to compel of August 5, 1998, filed on behalf of respondent by T. Lodge.4
08/07/1998Requests for admission filed on behalf of complainant by R. Hart.21
08/07/1998Response to request for admission, filed on behalf of Westside Cellular dba Cellnet, Inc. by R. Hart.21
08/07/1998Request for admission, filed on behalf of complainants by R. Hart.21
08/07/1998Request for admission, filed on behalf of applicant by R. Hart.21
08/06/1998Complainants Cellnet's first motion to compel discovery from GTE Mobilnet of Ohio LP, GTE Mobilnet of Cleveland, Inc., and Ohio RSA#3 LP and motion for sanctions against GTE Mobilnet, Incorporated and memorandum in support filed by R. Hart.62
08/04/1998Answer of Cincinnati SMSA Limited Partnership and Ameritech Mobile Communications, Inc., to third amended complaint, filed by J. Kelly.3
07/31/1998Motion for issuance of subpoena (Paul Nelson) filed on behalf of complainant by R. Hart.5
07/31/1998Motion for issuance of subpoena (Leigh Wood) filed on behalf of complainant by R. Hart.5
07/29/1998Entry ordering that the prehearing conference previously scheduled for August 13, 1998, is rescheduled for Monday August 17, 1998 at 1:30 p.m. at the Commission offices.1
07/27/1998New Par's answer to the third amended complaint filed by K. Trafford.2
07/27/1998Request that the prehearing conference be rescheduled for either August 17 or 18, 1998, filed on behalf of the New Par respondents by K. Trafford.1
07/27/1998Motion of The GTE Entities to dismiss and memorandum in support filed by T. Lodge. (31 pgs.)31
07/27/1998Answer of GTE Mobilnet Incorporated, GTE Mobilnet of Ohio LP, GTE Mobilnet of Cleveland Incorporated and Ohio RSA #3 to the third amended complaint, filed by T. Lodge.14
07/27/1998Request that the prehearing conference be rescheduled for either August 17, or 18, 1998, filed on behalf of the New Par respondents by K. Trafford.1
07/27/1998New Par's answer to the third amended complain filed by K. Trafford.2
07/27/1998Motion to dismiss and memorandum in support filed on behalf of GTE Mobilnet of Ohio LP, Ohio RSA #3 Limited Partnership, GTE Mobilnet of Cleveland, and GTE Mobilnet Incorporated by T. Lodge.31
07/23/1998Amended complaint on behalf of the applicant filed by R. Hart.202
07/20/1998Entry ordering that Cellnet's motion to compel is granted in part and denied in part; that GTE Mobilnet provide the applicable discovery responses as directed in this entry; that GTE Mobilnet's motion to dismiss is denied; scheduling a prehearing conference. (AE)3
06/29/1998Entry ordering that the prehearing conference previously scheduled for August 13, 1998, is rescheduled for August 17, 1998, at 1:30 p.m., at the Commission offices. (AE)1
05/26/1998Reply memorandum in support of motion to dismiss filed on behalf of respondent, GTE Mobilnet, by T. Lodge.9
05/15/1998Memorandum contra GTE Mobilnet, Inc.'s motion to dismiss, filed on behalf of complainant by J. Morgan.11
04/27/1998Motion to dismiss GTE Mobilnet Incorporated as a party and memorandum in support, filed on behalf of GTE Wireless by T. Lodge.13
04/25/1998Motion for enlargement of time to respond to requests for admission with request for expedited ruling, filed on behalf of respondents NewPar, dba AirTouch Cellular by K. Trafford.3
04/23/1998Entry denying Cellnet's March 30, 1998 application for rehearing; that certain clarifications of the Commission's February 28, 1998 entry, are adopted.4
04/17/1998Motion to compel and memorandum in support filed on behalf of complainant by R. Hart.76
04/09/1998Memorandum in opposition to Cellnet's application for rehearing, filed on behalf of New Par dba AirTouch Cellular by K. Trafford.9
04/09/1998Memorandum contra complainant's application for rehearing, filed on behalf of Ameritech Mobile and Cincinnati SMSA Limited Partnership by C. Rawlings.5
03/30/1998Application for rehearing and memorandum in support filed on behalf of complainant by J. Morgan.13
02/28/1998Entry ordering that Cellnet's motion for leave to amend its complaint should be granted as set forth in this entry; that the amended complaint, subject to the conditions of this entry, states reasonable grounds; that the parties shall engage in the discovery process as provided for by this entry; that Cellnet's motion for emergency relief is denied.8
02/11/1998GTE Mobilnet, Inc.'s supplemental answer to the amended complaint and renewed motion to dismiss filed by T. Lodge.13
02/04/1998Answer to the amended complaint filed on behalf of respondent, Sygnet Communications, by S. Howard.14
02/03/1998Answer to amended complaint filed on behalf of Sygnet Communications by S. Howard.14
01/28/1998Answer filed on behalf of Cincinnati SMSA Limited Partnership by J. Kelly.6
01/28/1998Answer filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Mobile Communications, by J. Kelly.5
10/07/1997Memorandum in opposition to Cellnet's motion for emergency relief, filed on behalf of AirTouch by K. Trafford.87
10/01/1997Complainant Westside Cellular, Inc. dba Cellnets motion for emergency relief filed by R. Hart.3
10/01/1997Memorandum in support of motion for emergency relief filed on behalf of complainant by R. Hart.11
08/29/1997Reply memorandum in support of its motion to dismiss on behalf of New Par's reply filed by K. Trafford.40
08/22/1997Memorandum contra New Par's motion to dismiss the amended complaint, filed on behalf of complainant by R. Hart.19
08/21/1997Motion to dismiss complaint and memorandum in support filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Mobile Communications and Cincinnati SMSA Limited Partnership by J. Kelly.4
08/12/1997Answer to amended complaint filed on behalf of New Par by K. Trafford.10
08/12/1997Motion to dismiss the amended complaint and memorandum in support filed on behalf of New Par by K. Trafford.55
07/21/1997Reply memorandum in support of motion to dismiss, filed on behalf of respondent, GTE Mobilenet, by T. Lodge.4
07/15/1997Complainant Westside Cellular, Inc. dba Cellnet's memorandum contra to motion to dismiss and memorandum in reply to memorandum filed by SYGNET Communications, Inc.8
07/07/1997Memorandum contra Cellnet's motion to reinstate entire amended complaint filed on behalf of Cincinnati SMSA Limited Partnership by C. Rawlings.4
07/07/1997Memorandum contra filed on behalf of Sygnet Communications by S. Howard.9
07/07/1997Motion to dismiss and memorandum in support filed on behalf of respondent, GTE Mobilnet of Ohio Limited Partnership, by T. Lodge.38
06/19/1997Motion to reinstate entire amended complaint and to re-join Youngstown Cellular as a respondent and memorandum in support filed on behalf of complainant by R. Hart.15
03/31/1997Reply memorandum to memorandum contra Cellnet's motion to compel GTE Mobilnet to provide responses to discovery requests, filed on behalf of complainant by M. Grady.7
03/27/1997Notice of withdrawal of pending motion filed on behalf of New Par by K. Trafford.2
03/14/1997Memorandum of Cincinnati SMSA Limited Partnership Contra Westside Cellular, Inc. dba Cellnet's motion to compel GTE Mobil net to provide responses to discovery requests, filed by J. Kelly.5
03/14/1997Memorandum regarding the proper scope of discovery, filed on behalf of New Par by K. Trafford.14
03/14/1997Memorandum in opposition to motion to compel of February 27, 1997, filed on behalf of GTE Mobilnet by T. Lodge.17
03/11/1997Letter confirming the outstanding issues pertaining to the discovery process in this case, filed by M. Grady.1
03/10/1997Notice of withdrawal of substitution of counsel filed on behalf of complainant by M. Grady.3
03/05/1997Notice of withdrawal of request for ruling filed on behalf of Cincinnati SMSA Limited Partnership and Ameritech Mobile Communications by J. Kelly.2
03/04/1997Correction to filing by GTE Mobilnet on March 3, 1997 filed by T. Lodge.1
03/03/1997Notice of GTE Mobilnet concerning pending pleadings, filed by T. Lodge.4
02/07/1997Entry ordering that a prehearing conference is scheduled in accordance with finding 3. (AE).2
11/07/1996Memorandum in opposition to alternative motion for protective order of October 31,1996, filed on behalf of GTE Mobilnet by T. Lodge.4
11/07/1996Letter clarifying the motion for the PUCO to obtain a mandate, writ or to compel the deposition of Gary Fleming, filed on behalf of Cellnet by J. Migden.1
10/31/1996Memorandum contra motion of GTE Mobilnet to compel responses to discovery or in the alternative motion for protective order, filed on behalf of Westside Cellular dba Cellnet by M. Grady.79
10/30/1996Letter requesting that a ruling on Cellnet motion be deferred until Cellnet indicates to the Commission by J. Migden.2
10/30/1996Memorandum of GTE Mobilnet in opposition to motion for the PUCO to obtain a mandate, writ of commission to compel deposition of Gary Fleming and suggestion of mootness filed by T. Lodge.6
10/30/1996Letter requesting that a ruling on Cellnet motion be deferred until Cellnet indicates to the Commission filed by J. Migden. (2 pgs.)2
10/25/1996Notice of substitution of original affidavit filed on behalf of the New Par respondents by K. Trafford.6
10/21/1996Cincinnati SMSA Limited Partnership's memorandum in response to complainant's motions filed by J. Kelly.4
10/21/1996New Par respondents' memorandum in opposition to Westside Cellular, Inc., dba Cellnet's motion for prehearing conference to resolve discovery disputes; motion to enlarge discovery period; motion to shorten the time for respondents discovery responses; motion to allow resolution by an attorney examiner of discovery disputes via telephone conferences; motion to compel responses to discovery requests; and motion for an expedited ruling filed by K. Trafford.16
10/21/1996Motion of GTE Mobilnet to compel responses to discovery, alternative request for expedited ruling, and memorandum of GTE Mobilnet in response to motions of October 15, 1996 filed by T. Lodge.43
10/16/1996Letter requesting that if a conference is held that it not be held before Thursday, October 24, 1996, filed on behalf of the New Par respondents by K. Trafford.2
10/15/1996Letter requesting additional time for the discovery process filed on behalf of Cincinnati SMSA Limited Partnership and Ameritech Mobile Communications by J. Kelly.1
10/15/1996Update on the progress of discovery filed on behalf of Cellnet by T. Lodge.2
10/15/1996Motion for the PUCO to obtain a mandate, writ or Commission to compete the deposition of Gary Fleming, filed on behalf of Cellnet by J. Migden.40
10/15/1996Motion for prehearing conference to resolve discovery disputes; motion to enlarge discovery period; motion to shorten the time for respondents; discovery responses; motion to allow resolution by an attorney examiner of discovery disputes via telephone conferences; motion to compel responses to discovery request; and motion for an expedited ruling and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Cellnet by J. Migden.146
09/23/1996Reply memorandum in support of motion to dismiss filed on behalf of GTE Mobilnet by T. Lodge.7
09/16/1996Memorandum contra GTE Mobilnet's motion to dismiss filed by R. Hart.4
09/11/1996Memorandum contra request of New Par Companies for extension of time to answer amended complaint and for temporary suspension of discovery and request for immediate ruling, filed on behalf of complainant by J. Migden.5
09/06/1996Motion for a temporary suspension of discovery and request for an immediate ruling filed on behalf of Cincinnati SMSA Limited Partnership and Ameritech Mobile Communications by J. Kelly.3
09/05/1996Memorandum contra request of GTE Mobilnet for extension of time to answer amended complaint and for temporary suspension of discovery and request for immediate ruling, filed by J. Migden.6
09/04/1996Motion for a temporary suspension of Discovery and request for immediate ruling, filed on behalf of New Par Company by K. Trafford.6
09/03/1996Answer filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Mobile Communications by C. Rawlings.5
09/03/1996Answer filed on behalf of respondent, Cincinnati SMSA Limited Partnership by C. Rawlings.5
09/03/1996Answer to amended complaint and motion to dismiss filed on behalf of respondent, GTE Mobilnet, by T. Lodge.7
09/03/1996Answer to count III of amended complaint, filed on behalf of New Par by K. Trafford.7
08/28/1996Request for extension of time to answer amended complaint and for temporary suspension of discovery and request for immediate ruling, filed on behalf of GTE Mobilnet by D. Hertlein.82
08/14/1996Entry ordering that Cellnet's motion for leave to file an amended complaint is granted in accordance with finding (7), it is further ordered that Youngstown Cellular Telephone Company is dismissed from this matter in accordance with finding (7) it is further ordered that within 20 days of this entry each respondent must file its respective answer to those counts of amended complaint as specified by finding (8), it is further ordered that Cellnet's motion for emergency relief is denied in accordance with finding (10) and that in regards to Cellnet's motion to compel discovery and to establish a procedural schedule, the parties should proceed in accordance with finding (12) and that Cellnet's motion for sanctions is denied in accordance with finding (12). (11 pgs.)11
02/26/1996Letter withdrawing the motion for emergency relief for unlawful disconnection and motion for expedited ruling filed on September 15, 1995, and September 26, 1995, filed by J. Migden.1
02/05/1996Reply to memorandum contra Cellnet's motion for leave to amend its complaint, filed on behalf of complainant by J. Migden.10
01/29/1996Memorandum contra filed on behalf of Ameritech Mobile Communications and Cincinnati SMSA Limited Partnership by J. Kelly.5
01/29/1996Memorandum in opposition to Cellnet's motion for leave to amend its complaint filed on behalf of GTE Mobilnet by T. Lodge.5
01/29/1996Memorandum in opposition to Cellnet's motion for leave to file an amended complaint filed on behalf of New Par by D. Conway.12
01/22/1996Reply to respondents' memoranda contra Cellnet's motion to compel discovery, motion for sanctions, and motion for procedural schedule, filed on behalf of complainant by J. Migden.14
01/22/1996Motion for leave to file its amended complaint and memorandum in support filed on behalf of complainant by J. Migden.28
01/16/1996Motion in response to motion for emergency ruling prohibiting Cellular One from offering a packaged rate plan, filed on behalf of GTE Mobilnet of Ohio Limited Partnership, Ohio RSA #3 Limited Partnership, and GTE Mobilnet by T. Lodge.7
01/12/1996Amended complaint filed on behalf of complainant by J. Migden.19
01/12/1996Memorandum contra Cellnet's motion for emergency ruling prohibiting Cellular One from offering the "Chat Pack Rate Plan" filed on behalf of New Par by D. Conway.14
01/10/1996Motion for emergency ruling filed on behalf of complainant by M. Grady.17
01/05/1996Memorandum contra Cellnet's motion to set procedural schedule filed on behalf of New Par by D. Conway.12
01/05/1996Memorandum in opposition to motion to compel response to discovery, motion for sanctions, and motion to set procedural schedule filed on behalf of GTE Mobilnet by T. Lodge.43
01/05/1996Memorandum contra filed on behalf of Ameritech Mobile Communications and Cincinnati SMSA Limited Partnership by J. Kelly.5
01/05/1996Memorandum in response to Cellnet's December 22, 1995 motions filed on behalf of Youngstown Cellular by S. Howard.4
01/05/1996Memorandum of GTE Mobilnet in opposition to motion to compel responses to discovery, motion for sanctions, and motion to set procedural schedule filed by T. Lodge.43
12/28/1995Entry granting the motions for extension of time; that all respondents shall have until January 5, 1995, to file their responses to Cellnet's motions; complainant shall have seven days from the date of service in which to file its reply. (AE)2
12/28/1995Motion for extension of time and memorandum in support filed on behalf of New Par by D. Conway.4
12/28/1995Memorandum contra motion for extension of time filed on behalf of complainant by J. Migden.4
12/27/1995Request for extension of time to respond to motion of December 22, 1995 and request for immediate ruling filed on behalf of GTE Mobilnet by T. Lodge.6
12/22/1995Motion to compel responses to discovery, motion for sanctions, motion to set procedural schedule and motion for expedited ruling and memorandum in support filed on behalf of complainant by J. Migden.43
10/12/1995Proof of publication filed. (Perry County)1
10/03/1995Respondents' memorandum contra Cellnet's motion for emer- gency relief, filed on behalf of The New Par Comanies by D. Conway. (15 pgs.)15
10/02/1995Letter withdrawing Cellnet's motion for emergency relief for unlawful disconnection of service and motion for expedited ruling, filed by J. Migden.2
09/27/1995Letter withdrawing Cellnet's motion for emergency relief for unlawful disconnection of service and motion for expedited ruled, filed by J. Migden.2
09/26/1995Letter informing the Commission of its position regarding the September 15, 1995, Westside Cellular Filing, submitted on behalf of the New Par Companies by D.Conway.2
06/01/1995Proof of publication filed. (Noble County)1
04/26/1995Proof of publication filed. (Morrow County)1
04/21/1995Proof of publication filed. (Ottawa County)2
04/21/1995Proof of Publication filed. (Ottawa County) (2 pgs.)0
04/20/1995Proof of publication filed. (Summit County)1
04/18/1995Proof of publication filed. (Shelby County)1
04/18/1995Motion for issuance of subpoena duces tecum for David Cross, filed on behalf of complainant by J. Migden.5
04/18/1995Motion for issuance of subpoena duces tecum filed on behalf of complainant by J. Migden.4
04/18/1995Motion for issuance of subpoena duces tecum for David Cross filed on behalf of complainant by J. Migden. (5 pgs.)0
04/18/1995Motion for issuance of subpoena duces tecum for Amid Yousef filed on behalf of complainant by J. Migden. (4 pgs.)0
04/17/1995Transcript filed for hearing held 4/11/95, (JJ), (6 pgs., Con't.0
04/17/1995Proof of Publication filed. (Meigs County) (1 pg.)0
04/17/1995Proof of publication filed (Meigs Co.)1
04/15/1995Proof of publication filed (Columbiana Co.)1
04/13/1995Entry denying the applications for rehearing submitted by GTE Mobilenet and New Par, and that the Commission's March 23, 1995 entry is affirmed in its entirety; that the motions seeking a stay of these proceedings and of further discovery are denied; that the motion to compel is affirmed in accordance with Finding 9; that GTE Mobilnet fully comply with the Commission's directive to respond to outstanding written discovery by 4/18/95; that Cellnet's request for a generic investigation of the cellular industry is denied in accordance with Finding 15.12
04/12/1995Reply memorandum in support of its motion for continuance of the trial date, filed on behalf of Westside Cellular dba Cellnet by J. Migden.4
04/12/1995Proof of publication filed. (Wayne Co.)1
04/12/1995Reply memorandum in support of motion of GTE Mobilnet and Gary Fleming to quash subpoena directed to Gary Fleming filed on behalf of GTE Mobilnet by T. Lodge.9
04/12/1995Proof of publication filed (Defiance Co.)1
04/12/1995Proof of Publication filed (Stark Co.)6
04/12/1995Reply memorandum in support of motion of GTE Mobilnet and Gary Fleming to quash subpoena directed to Gary Fleming, filed on behalf of respondents, GTE Mobilnet of Ohio Limited Partnership, Ohio RSA #3 Limited Partner- ship and GTE Mobilnet Incorporated, and Gary Fleming by T. Lodge. (9 pgs.)0
04/12/1995Proof of Publication filed. (Wayne County) (1 pg.)0
04/12/1995Reply memorandum in support of its motion for continuance of the trial date, filed on behalf of complainant by J. Migden. (4 pgs.)0
04/11/1995Memorandum contra filed on behalf of Cincinnati SMSA Limited Partnership by J. Kelly.4
04/11/1995Memorandum contra in response to the motion for continuance of the hearing date, filed on behalf of GTE Mobilnet by T. Lodge.6
04/11/1995Memorandum contra Cellnets April 4, 1995 motion filed on behalf of The NOTCO and other respondents by D. Conway.4
04/11/1995Notice of substitution of counsel and designation of new trial attorney filed on behalf of NOTCO by D. Conway.3
04/11/1995Proof of publication filed (Marion Co.)1
04/11/1995Notice of withdrawal of counsel for New Par Companies by S. Bloomfield.2
04/07/1995Entry ordering April 11, 1995 hearing be continued in accordance with Finding (4), that all parties comply with Finding (5) (JJ).2
04/07/1995Proof of publication filed (Union Co.)2
04/07/1995Motion and memorandum to admit counsel filed on behalf of Cincinnati SMSA Limited Partnership and Ameritech Mobile Communications, Inc., by J. Kelly.3
04/06/1995Proof of publication filed (Richland Co.)3
04/05/1995Proof of Publication filed (Butler Co.)4
04/04/1995Motion for continuance of the hearing date, filed on behalf of Westside Celluar dba Cellnet by J. Migden.10
04/04/1995Proof of publication filed (Williams Co.)4
04/03/1995Proof of publication filed (Knox County)3
04/03/1995Memorandum contra motion to quash subpoena filed on behalf of GTE Mobilnet and Gary Fleming by J. Migden.56
03/31/1995Memorandum contra the applications for rehearing and request for stay filed by GTE Mobilnet and Northern Ohio Cellular Telephone Company and other respondents and motion to strike portions of NOCTOCO'S application filed on behalf of Westside Cellular dba Cellnet by J. Migden.25
03/31/1995Proof of publication filed (Clermont County)4
03/30/1995Proof of publication filed. (Tuscarawas County)3
03/30/1995letter clarification as to the issuance of the subpoena for Leigh Wood, filed by S. Bloomfield.1
03/30/1995Reply memorandum filed on behalf of NOCTO and other respon- dents by S. Bloomfield. (3 pgs.)0
03/30/1995Reply memorandum of NOCTCO and other respondents filed by S. Bloomfield.3
03/30/1995Correspondence regarding the certificate of service regarding Leigh Wood, filed by S. Bloomfield.1
03/29/1995Proof of Publication filed. (Wyandot County) (1 pg.)0
03/28/1995Proof of publication filed. (Highland County)8
03/28/1995Certificate of service for the subpoena of Leigh Wood, filed on behalf of complainant by M. Grady.2
03/27/1995Proof of publication filed. (Adams County)1
03/27/1995Application for rehearing filed on behalf of NOCTO respondents and other respondents by M. Christensen.18
03/27/1995Application of GTE Mobilnet for rehearing and request for stay pending rehearing filed by T. Lodge.28
03/27/1995Motion to Quash and for protective order memorandum in support filed by S. Bloomfield.36
03/27/1995Motion to stay the proceedings and discovery memorandum in support filed by S. Bloomfield.5
03/24/1995Proof of publication filed. (Fayette County)1
03/24/1995Motion to quash subpoena directed to Gary Fleming, filed on behalf of GTE Mobilnet and Gary Fleming by T. Lodge.21
03/24/1995Certificate of service filed on behalf of complainant by R. Hart.2
03/24/1995Certificate of service for subpoena for Robert Hatfield, filed on behalf of complainant by R. Hart. (2 pgs.)0
03/24/1995Certificate of Service for subpoena for Seamus Hyland, filed on behalf of complainant by R. Hart.2
03/24/1995Certificate of service of subpoena on Robert Hatfield, filed on behalf of complainant by R. Hart.2
03/24/1995Certificate of service of subpoena for Maureen Havrilla, filed on behalf of complainant by R. Hart.2
03/23/1995Entry ordering that CSLP's motion to strike Cellnet's memorandum contra is granted, attorney examiner's November 2, 1994 entry is affirmed in its entirety.5
03/23/1995Entry ordering that the attorney examiner's rulings set forth in the February 23, 1995 entry are affirmed in accordance with Findings 5,6 and 7; that GTE Mobilenet respond to outstanding discovery by March 27, 2995, that New Par's March 6, 1995 pleading is an untimely and in appropriate filing in accordance with Finding 10.9
03/23/1995Memorandum contra motions of respondents GTE Mobilnet and New Par to quash subpoena and for protective order, filed on behalf of Westside Celluar dba Cellnet by R. Hart.3
03/22/1995Certificate of service for subpoena for Gary Fleming, filed on behalf of complainant by R. Hart.2
03/21/1995Letter withdrawing the motion to compel filed on behalf of New Par by M. Christensen.2
03/21/1995Entry ordered that the issue outlined in Finding (4) be certified to the Commission in accordance with 4901:1-15(B). O.A.C. (JJ)2
03/20/1995Legal Notices faxed to all newspapers serving the 88 counties in the State of Ohio.89
03/16/1995Motion for issuance of subpoenas and subpoenas duces tecum for Gary E. Fleming, filed on behalf of Westside Celluar dba Cellnet by J. Migden.6
03/16/1995Motion to quash and for protective order and memorandum in support filed on behalf of NOCTCO and other respondents by M. Christensen.33
03/14/1995Entry scheduling a hearing at 9:00 a.m. on 4/11/95 at the Commission offices.3
03/10/1995Motions for issuance of subpoenas and subpoenas duces tecum filed on behalf of Westside Cellular dba Cellnet by J. Migden. (for Mr. Paul Nelson) (4 pgs.)0
03/10/1995Motions for issuance of subpoenas and subpoenas duces tecum filed on behalf of Westside Cellular dba Cellnet by J. Migden. (for Robert Hatfield) (6 pgs.)0
03/10/1995Motions for issuance of subpoenas and subpoenas duces tecum filed on behalf of Westside Cellular dba Cellnet by J. Migden. (for Ms. Leigh Wood) (4 pgs.)0
03/10/1995Motions for issuance of subpoenas and subpoenas duces tecum filed on behalf of Westside Cellular dba Cellnet by J. Migden. (for John E. Rooney) (4 pgs.)0
03/10/1995Motions for issuance of subpoenas and subpoenas duces tecum filed on behalf of Westside Cellular dba Cellnet by J. Migden. (for Mr. Seamus Hyland) (4 pgs.)0
03/10/1995Motions for issuance of subpoenas and subpoenas duces tecum filed on behalf of Westside Cellular dba Cellnet by J. Migden. (for Gary Fleming) (5 pgs.)0
03/10/1995Motions for issuance of subpoenas and subpoenas duces tecum filed on behalf of Westside Cellular dba Cellnet by J. Migden. (for Thomas Minardo) (6 pgs.)0
03/10/1995Motion for issuance of subpoena Duces Tecum filed by J. Migden.4
03/10/1995Motion for issuance of subpoenas and subpoenas duces tecum for John H. Nichols, III, filed on behalf of Westside Celluar dba Cellnet by J. Migden.4
03/10/1995Motion for issuance of subpoenas and subpoenas duces tecum for Mr.Seamus Hyland, filed on behalf of Westside Celluar dba Cellnet by J. Migden.4
03/10/1995Motion for issuance of subpoenas and subpoenas duces tecum for Mr.John E. Rooney, filed on behalf of Westside Celluar dba Cellnet by J. Migden.4
03/10/1995Motion for issuance of subpoenas and subpoenas duces tecum for Mr. Paul Nelson, filed on behalf of Westside Cellular dba Cellnet by J. Migden.4
03/10/1995Motions for issuance of subpoenas and subpoena duces tecum for Robert Hatfield, filed on behalf of Westside Cellular dba Cellnet by J. Migden6
03/10/1995Motions for issuance of subpoenas and subpoenas duces tecum for Gary Fleming, filed on behalf of Westside Celluar dba Cellnet by J. Migden.5
03/10/1995Motions for issuance of subpoenas and subpoenas duces tecum for Ms. Leigh Wood, filed on behalf of Westside Cellular dba Cellnet by J. Migden.4
03/10/1995Motion for issuance of subpoenas and subpoenas duces tecum for Thomas Minardo , filed on behalf of Westside Celluar dba Cellnet by J. Migden.6
03/07/1995Motion to strike and memorandum contra response in support of interlocutory review filed by New Par respondents, filed on behalf of Westside Cellular dba Cellnet by R. Hart. (6 pgs.)0
03/07/1995Motion to strike and memorandum contra response in support of interlocutory review filed by New Par respondents, filed on behalf of Westside Celluar dba Cellnet by R. Hart.6
03/06/1995Memorandum contra application of GTE Mobilnet for interlocutory review of entry overruling motion for protective order or alternatively to stay discovery, and granting motion to complete and request for expedited ruling, filed on behalf of Westside Cellular dba Cellnet by R. Hart.18
03/06/1995Response in support of interlocutory review and memorandum in support filed on behalf of The New Par Companies by S. Bloomfield.11
03/06/1995Memorandum contra application of GTE Mobilnet for inter- locutory review of entry overruling motion for protective order or alternatively to stay discovery, and granting motion to compel and request for expedited ruling, filed on behalf of Westside Cellular dba Cellnet by R. Hart. (17 pgs.)0
03/06/1995Response in support of interlocutory review and memorandum in support filed on behalf of The New Par Companies by S. Bloomfield. (11 pgs.)0
02/28/1995Application of GTE Mobilnet for interlocutory review of entry overruling motion for protective order, or alternatively, to stay discovery, and granting motion to compel filed by T. Lodge.35
02/28/1995Application of GTE Mobilnet for inerlocutory review of entry overruling motion for protective order or, alternatively, to stay discovery, and granting motion to compel filed by T. Lodge. (35 pgs.)0
02/23/1995Entry denying GTE Mobilnet's October 18, 1994 motion to dismiss; that Cellnet's motion for sanctions is denied; that Cellnet's motion to compel is granted; that GTE Mobilnet's October 24, 1994 motion for a protective order is denied; scheduling a prehearing conference at 10:00 a.m. on 3/7/95 at the Commission offices.8
02/23/1995Entry denying GTE Mobilnet's October 18, 1994 motion to dismiss; that Cellnet's motion for sanctions is denied; that Cellnet's motion to compel is granted; that GTE Mobilnet's October 24, 1994 motion for a protective order is denied; scheduling a prehearing conference at 10:00 a.m. on 3/7/95 at the Commission offices. (AE) (8 pgs.)0
01/24/1995Notice to take deposition of Jon F. Kelly, filed on behalf of Cellnet, Inc., by M. Grady.3
01/24/1995Notice to take deposition of Jon F. Kelly, filed on behalf of Cellnet, Inc. by M. Grady. (3 pgs.)0
12/30/1994Notice to take deposition upon oral examination (to Janine Migden) filed on behalf of respondent, Cincinnati SMSA Limited Partnership, by J. Kelly.3
12/30/1994Notice to take depositions upon oral examination (to Janine Migden), filed on behalf of respondent, Cin- cinnati SMSA Limited Partnership, by J. Kelly. (3 pgs.)0
12/16/1994Motion for issuance of subpoena duces tecum for David Cross, filed on behalf of complainant by J.Migden.4
12/16/1994Motion for issuance of subpoena for Janine Lang, filed on behalf of complainant by J. Migden.4
12/16/1994Motion for issuance of subpoena duces tecum for Amid Yousef, filed on behalf of complainant by J. Migden.4
12/16/1994Notion to take deposition upon oral examination (for Jon F. Kelly) filed on behalf of complainant by J. Migden.3
12/16/1994Motion for issuance of subpoena duces tecum for David Cross, filed on behalf of complainant by M. Grady. (4 pgs.)0
12/16/1994Motion for issuance of subpoena for Janine Lang, filed on behalf of complainant by J. Migden. (4 pgs.)0
12/16/1994Motion for issuance of subpoena duces tecum for Amid Yousef, filed on behalf of complainant by J. Migden. (4 pgs.)0
12/16/1994Notice to take deposition upon oral examination (for Jon F. Kelly) filed on behalf of complainant by J. Migden. (3 pgs.)0
12/05/1994Joint motion for extension of time and request for expedited ruling filed on behalf of NOTCO respondents by M. Christensen; Youngstown Cellular by S. Howard; Westside Cellular dba Cellnet by J. Migden; and Cincinnati SMSA Limited Partnership by J. Kelly.4
12/05/1994Entry granting the motion for an extension of time and ordering that the December 6, 1994 prehearing conference be rescheduled until January 19, 1995.(JA)2
12/05/1994Joint motion for extension of time and request for ex- pedited ruling filed on behalf of NOCTCo respondents by M. Christensen; Youngstown Cellular by S. Howard; Westside Cellular dba Cellnet by J. Migden; and Cincinnati SMSA Limited Partnership by J. Kelly. (4 pgs.)0
12/05/1994Entry granting the motion for an extension of time and ordering that the December 6, 1994 prehearing conference be rescheduled until January 10, 1995. (AE) (2 pgs.)0
12/01/1994Memorandum in opposition to complainant's motion for sanctions filed on behalf of respondent, GTE North, by T. Lodge. (10 pgs.)0
12/01/1994Memorandum in opposition to complainant's motion for sanctions filed on behalf of respondent, GTE North by T. Lodge.11
12/01/1994Entry scheduling a prehearing conference set for December 6, 1994 at 10:00 a.m. at the offices of the Commission.2
12/01/1994Entry scheduling a prehearing conference set for December 6, 1994 at 10:00 a.m. at the offices of the Commission. (AE) (2 pgs.)0
11/30/1994Motion to strike and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Cincinnati SMSA Limited Partnership by J. Kelly. (5 pgs.)0
11/30/1994Motion to strike and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Cincinnati SMSA Limited Partnership by J. Kelly.5
11/15/1994Memorandum contra Cincinnati SMSA Limited Partnership's application for review, filed on behalf of complainant by M. Grady.19
11/15/1994Memorandum contra Cincinnati SMSA Limited Partnership's application for review, filed on behalf of complainant by M. Grady. (19 pgs.)0
11/14/1994Substituted motion for sanctions and withdrawal of prior motion for sanctions and memorandum in support filed on behalf of complainant by J. Migden. (9 pgs.)0
11/14/1994Substituted motion for sanctions and withdrawal of prior motion for sanctions and memorandum in support filed on behalf of complainant by J. Migden.9
11/10/1994Reply memorandum regarding motion to dismiss for want of subject matter jurisdiction or, alternatively, to stay proceedings, and motion for protective order or, alter- natively, to stay discovery, filed on behalf of respondents by T. Lodge. (16 pgs.)0
11/10/1994Reply memorandum regarding motion to dismiss for want of subject matter jurisdiction or, alternatively, to stay proceedings, and motion for protective order or alternatively, to stay discovery, filed on behalf of respondent by T. Lodge.16
11/07/1994Application for review filed on behalf of Cincinnati SMSA Limited Partnership by J. Kelly.32
11/07/1994Application for review filed on behalf of Cincinnati SMSA Limited Partnership by J. Kelly. (31 pgs.)0
11/04/1994Memorandum contra motion to compel, filed on behalf of complainant by J. Migden.13
11/04/1994Memorandum contra motion to compel filed on behalf of complainant by J. Migden. (13 pgs.)0
11/02/1994Entry ordering that Cellnet's request for an expedited ruling is moot; that Cellnet's motion to compel is granted as outlined in Finding 8. (AE)5
11/02/1994Entry ordering that Cellnet's request for an expedited ruling is moot in accordance with Finding 7; that Cell- net's motion to compel is granted as outlined in Find- ing 8. (AE) (5 pgs.)0
10/31/1994Westside Cellular, D/B/A Cellnet's memorandum in support of motion for sanctions filed by J. Migden. (10 pgs.)0
10/31/1994Cellnet's memorandum contra GTE's motion for protective order or alternatively to stay discovery and motion for an expedited ruling filed by J. Migden. (8 pgs.)0
10/31/1994Cellnet's memorandum contra motion to dismiss or alternat- ively to stay proceeding filed by GTE Mobilnet and Motion for an expedited ruling filed by J. Migden. (13 pgs.)0
10/31/1994Memorandum contra motion to dismiss or alternatively to stay proceedings filed by GTE Mobilnet and motion for an expedited ruling filed on behalf of complainant by J. Migden.13
10/31/1994Memorandum contra GTE's motion for protective order or alternatively to stay discovery and motion for an expedited ruling filed on behalf of complainant by J. Migden.8
10/31/1994Memorandum in support of motion for sanctions filed on behalf of complainants by J. Migden.10
10/28/1994Motion to dismiss filed on behalf of respondents by M. Christensen.2
10/28/1994Concurrence in motion to dismiss filed on behalf of NOCTCO respondents by M. Christensen. (2 pgs.)0
10/24/1994Motion for protective order or, alternatively, to stay discovery, and response to motion to compel filed on behalf of respondent by T. Lodge.49
10/24/1994Motion for protective order or, alternatively, to stay discovery, and response to motion to compel and memor- andum in support filed on behalf of respondents by T. Lodge. (49 pgs.)0
10/18/1994Motion to dismiss for want of jurisdiction or, alternatively, to stay proceedings and memorandum in support filed on behalf of respondents by T. Lodge.36
10/18/1994Motion to compel discovery and motion for expedited ruling filed on behalf of respondents by S. Bloomfield.29
10/18/1994Second memorandum contra Cellnet's motion to compel responses to discovery and motion for expedited ruling filed on behalf of respondents by S. Bloomfield.13
10/18/1994Second memorandum contra Cellnet's motion to compel responses to discovery and motion for expedited ruling, filed on behalf of respondents by S. Bloomfield. (13 pgs.)0
10/18/1994Motion to compel responses to discovery and motion for expedited ruling and memorandum in support filed on behalf of respondents, GTE Mobilnet, Inc. et. al., by S. Bloomfield. (29 pgs.)0
10/18/1994Motion to dismiss for want of jurisdiction or, alterna- tively, to stay proceedings and memorandum in support filed on behalf of respondents, GTE Mobilnet of Ohio Limited Partnership, Ohio RSA #3 Limited Partnership, and GTE Mobilnet Incorporated by T. Lodge. (35 pgs.)0
10/14/1994Second motion to compel responses to discovery and motion for expedited ruling and memorandum in support filed on behalf of complainant by J. Migden.55
10/14/1994Complainant's second motion to compel responses to discovery and motion for expedited ruling and memorandum in support filed by J. Migden. (56 pgs.)0
10/12/1994Memoranda contra Cellnet's motion to compel responses to discovery and motion for expedited ruling, filed on behalf of complainant by M. Christensen.9
10/12/1994Memoranda contra Cellnet's motion to compel responses to discovery and motion for expedited ruling filed by M. Christensen. (9 pgs.)0
10/11/1994Cincinnati SMSA Limited Partnership's Memorandum Contra Cellnet's motion to compel responses to discovery filed by J. Kelly. (34 pgs.)0
10/11/1994Memorandum contra Cellnet's motion to compel responses to discovery, filed on behalf of Cincinnati SMSA Limited Partnership by J. Kelly.34
10/04/1994Motion to compel responses to discovery and motion for expedited ruling and memorandum in support filed on behalf of complainant by J. Migden.16
10/04/1994Motion to compel responses to discovery and memorandum in support filed on behalf of complainant by J. Migden. (27 pgs.)0
10/04/1994Motion to compel responses to discovery and motion for expedited ruling and memorandum in support filed on behalf of complainant by J. Migden. (16 pgs.)0
10/01/1994Motion to compel responses to discovery and memorandum in support filed on behalf of complainant by M. Grady.27
09/30/1994Entry scheduling a prehearing conference. (AE)2
09/30/1994Entry scheduling a prehearing conference at 10:00 a.m. on 10/5/94 at the Commission offices. (AE) (2 pgs.)0
09/02/1994Letter informing the Commission that all parties to this proceeding have agreed to postpone the hearing of this matter until January 1995, filed by R. Hart.1
09/02/1994Letter stating that all parties have agreed to postpone the hearing of this matter until January, 1995, filed by R. Hart. (1 pg.)0
08/04/1994Motion and memorandum to admit counsel filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Mobile Communications, by J. Kelly.3
08/04/1994Motion and memorandum to admit counsel filed on behalf of respondents, Cincinnati SMSA Limited Partnership and Ameritech Mobile Communications by J. Kelly.0
08/03/1994Entry ordering that the applications for rehearing filed on July 15, 1994, and July 18, 1994, are denied; scheduling this case for a prehearing conference at 1:30 p.m. on 8/25/94 at the Commission offices.0
08/03/1994Entry denying the applications for rehearing filed on July 15, 1994, and July 18, 1994, respectively; that this case be set for prehearing conference. 7
08/03/1994Entry ordering that the applications for rehearing filed on July 15, 1994, and July 18, 1994, respectively are denied; scheduling a prehearing conference at 1:30 p.m. on August 25, 1994, Commission offices.7
08/01/1994Memorandum contra applications for rehearing filed by respondents, filed on behalf of complainant by J. Migden.11
08/01/1994Memorandum contra applications for rehearing filed by respondents, filed on behalf of complainant, Westside Cellular dba Cellnet, by J. Migden.0
07/25/1994Entry postponing the prehearing conference previously scheduled. (AE)0
07/18/1994Application for rehearing of Northern Ohio Cellular, Akron Cellular, Canton Cellular, and Columbus Cellular, and Cellular Communications, Lorain/Elyria Cellular, Pactel Cellular of Ohio Airtouch Cellular of Ohio and New Par by S. Bloomfield.9
07/18/1994Application for rehearing filed on behalf of Northern Ohio Cellular Telephone Co., Akron Cellular Telephone Co., Canton Cellular Telephone Co., and Columbus Cellular Telephone Co. and Cellular Communications, Inc., Lorain/Elyria Cellu- lar Co., Pactel Cellular, Inc. of Ohio (Airtouch Cellular of Ohio), and New Par by S. Bloomfield.0
07/15/1994Certificate of service for subpoena of Bruce Knooihuizen filed on behalf of complainant by J. Migden.5
07/15/1994Application for rehearing and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Ameritech Mobile Communications by J. Kelly.11
07/15/1994Certificate of service filed on behalf of complainant by J. Migden.0
07/15/1994Application for rehearing and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Ameritech Mobile Communications by J. Kelly.0
07/13/1994Motion for issuance of subpoena duces tecum to Bruce R. Knooihuizen (with attached subpoena) filed.6
07/13/1994Motion for issuance of subpoena duces tecum to Robert Hatfield (with attached subpoena) filed.6
07/13/1994Motion for issuance of subpoena duces tecum to John Nichols, III (with attached subpoena) filed.6
07/13/1994Motion for issuance of subpoena duces tecum to Gary Fleming (with attached subpoena) filed.6
07/13/1994Motion for issuance of subpoena duces tecum to William Ginsburg (with attached subpoena) filed.6
07/13/1994Motion for issuance of subpoena duces tecum to Seamus Hyland (with attached subpoena) filed.6
07/13/1994Motion for issuance of subpoena duces tecum to J. Barclay Knapp (with attached subpoena) filed.6
07/13/1994Motion for issuance of subpoena duces tecum for Greg Gorelick, filed on behalf of complainant by J. Migden.6
07/13/1994Subpoena duces tecum to Leigh Wood, filed.3
07/13/1994Subpoena duces tecum to Thomas Minardo, filed.3
07/13/1994Notice to take deposition upon oral examination to Sally Bloomfield, Mary Christensen, and Anne Marie Sferra filed on behalf of complainant by J. Migden.4
07/13/1994Motion for issuance of subpoena duces tecum for Paul Nelson (with attached subpoena) filed.6
07/13/1994Subpoena duces tecum to John E. Rooney, filed.4
07/13/1994Subpoena duces tecum to Karen Potocki, filed.3
07/13/1994Notice to take deposition upon oral examination to Stephen Howard, filed on behalf of complainant by J. Migden.3
07/13/1994Notice to take deposition upon oral examination to Sally Bloomfield, Mary Christensen, and Anne Marie Sferra, filed on behalf of complainant by J. Migden.4
07/13/1994Notice to take deposition upon oral examination to Jon Kelly, filed on behalf of complainant by J. Migden.7
07/13/1994Notice to take deposition upon oral examination to Judith Sanders, filed on behalf of complainant by J. Migden.7
07/13/1994Notice to take deposition upon oral examination to Raymond Gross, filed on behalf of complainant by J. Migden.3
07/13/1994Notice to take deposition upon oral examination to Sally Bloomfield, filed on behalf of complainant by J. Migden.7
07/13/1994Motion for issuance of subpoena for Janine Lang filed on behalf of complainant by J. Migden.4
07/13/1994Motion for issuance of subpoena for Raymond Gross filed on behalf of complainant by J. Migden.4
07/13/1994Motion for issuance of subpoena duces tecum for Bruce R. Knooihuizen, filed on behalf of complainant by J. Migden.0
07/13/1994Motion for issuance of subpoena duces tecum for Robert Hatfield, filed on behalf of complainant by J. Migden.0
07/13/1994Motion for issuance of subpoena duces tecum for John H. Nichols, III, filed on behalf of complainant by J. Migden.0
07/13/1994Motion for issuance of subpoena duces tecum for Gary Fleming, filed on behalf of complainant by J. Migden.0
07/13/1994Motion for issuance of subpoena duces tecum for Mr. William Ginsburg, filed on behalf of complainant by J. Migden.0
07/13/1994Motion for issuance of subpoena duces tecum for Mr. Seamus Hyland, filed on behalf of complainant by J. Migden.0
07/13/1994Motion for issuance of subpoena duces tecum for J. Barclay Knapp, filed on behalf of complainant by J. Migden.0
07/13/1994Motion for issuance of subpoena duces tecum for Mr. Greg Gorelick, filed on behalf of complainant by J. Migden.0
07/13/1994Motion for issuance of subpoena duces tecum for Ms. Leigh Wood, filed on behalf of complainant by J. Migden.0
07/13/1994Motion for issuance of subpoena duces tecum for Mr. Thomas Minardo, filed on behalf of complainant by J. Migden.0
07/13/1994Motion for issuance of subpoena duces tecum for an officer, agent or representative of Pactel Cellular, Inc. of Ohio, filed on behalf of complainant by J. Migden.0
07/13/1994Motion for issuance of subpoena duces tecum for Mr. Paul Nelson, filed on behalf of complainant by J. Migden.0
07/13/1994Motion for issuance of subpoena duces tecum for John E. Rooney, filed on behalf of complainant by J. Migden.0
07/13/1994Motion for issuance of subpoena duces tecum for Ms. Karen Potocki, filed on behalf of complainant by J. Migden.0
07/13/1994Notice to take deposition upon oral examination to Stephen M. Howard, filed on behalf of complainant by J. Migden.0
07/13/1994Notice to take deposition upon oral examination to Sally W. Bloomfield, Mary W. Christensen, and Anne Marie Sferra, filed on behalf of complainant by J. Migden.0
07/13/1994Notice to take deposition upon oral examination to Jon F. Kelly, filed on behalf of complainant by J. Migden.0
07/13/1994Notice to take deposition upon oral examination to Judith B. Sanders, filed on behalf of complainant by J. Migden.0
07/13/1994Notice to take deposition upon oral examination to Raymond G. Gross, filed on behalf of complainant by J. Migden.0
07/13/1994Notice to take deposition upon oral examination to Sally W. Bloomfield, Mary W. Christensen, and Anne Marie Sferra, filed on behalf of complainant by J. Migden.0
07/13/1994Motion for issuance of subpoena for Janine Lang, filed on behalf of complainant by J. Migden.0
07/13/1994Motion for issuance of subpoena for Mr. Raymond Gross, filed on behalf of complainant by J. Migden.0
07/11/1994Entry of appearance of co-counsel filed on behalf of GTE Mobilnet by J. Sanders.2
07/11/1994Entry of appearance as co-counsel filed on behalf of GTE Mobilnet by T. Lodge, J. Sanders.0
07/06/1994Motion for continuance, or, in the alternative, for a protective order filed on behalf of Northern Ohio Cellular Telephone, Akron Cellular Telephone, Canton Cellular Telephone, Columbus Cellular Telephone; and New Par, Cellular Communications, Airtouch Cellular of Ohio, Lorain/Elyria Cellular Telephone, and Cellular Communications of Mansfield by S. Bloomfield.0
07/06/1994Motion for continuance or, in the alternative, for a protective order and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Northern Ohio Cellular, Akron Cellular, Canton Cellular, Columbus Cellular and New Par, Cellular Communications, AirTouch Cellular, Lorain/Elyria Cellular, and Cellular Communications of Mansfield by S. Bloomfield.11
07/06/1994Entry scheduling a prehearing conference; that the motions for protective orders and extensions of time to respond to discovery are moot. (AE)3
07/06/1994Entry scheduling a pre-hearing conference at 1:30 p.m. on 8/4/94 at the Commission offices; that the motions for protective orders and extensions of time to respond to discovery are moot. (AE)0
07/01/1994Answer filed on behalf of Ameritech Mobile Communications by J. Kelly.4
07/01/1994Answer filed on behalf of Cincinnati SMSA Limited Partnership by J. Kelly.4
07/01/1994Supplemental answer filed on behalf of GTE Mobilnet by J. Sanders.3
07/01/1994Answer filed on behalf of Youngstown Cellular by S. Howard.10
07/01/1994Answer filed on behalf of Northern Ohio Cellular, Akron Cellular, Canton Cellular, and Columbus Cellular, and New Par, Cellular Communications, AirTouch Cellular, Lorain/Elyria Cellular, and Cellular Communications of Mansfield by M. Christensen.11
07/01/1994Supplemental answer filed on behalf of respondent, GTE Mobilnet, Inc., by J. Sanders.0
07/01/1994Answer filed on behalf of respondent, Youngstown Cellular Telephone Co., by S. Howard.0
07/01/1994Answer filed on behalf of respondents, Northern Ohio Cellular Telephone Co., Akron Cellular Telephone Co., Canton Cellular Telephone Co., and Columbus Telephone and New Par, Cellular Communications, Airtouch Cellular of Ohio, Lorain/Elyria Cellular, and Cellular Communica- tions of Mansfield by M. Christensen.0
06/30/1994Motion for issuance of subpoena to Janine Lang (with attached subpoena) filed.4
06/24/1994Entry ordering that the motion for an extension of time is denied and all answers must be filed by July 1, 1994. (AE)2
06/21/1994Motion of respondents for an extension of time to file answers for an expedited ruling, filed by S. Bloomfield.5
06/21/1994Motion of Respondents, Northern Ohio Cellular Telephone Co- mpany, Akron Cellular Telephone Company, Canton Cellular Telephone Company, and Columbus Cellular Telephone Company and Cellular Communications, Inc., Lorain/Elyria Cellular Company, Pactel Cellular, Inc. of Ohio (Now known as Air- touch Cellular of Ohio) and New Par and Youngstown Cellular Telephone Company and Ameritech Mobile Communications, Inc. and Cincinnati SMSA Limited Partnership for an Extension of Time to file Answers and for an Exedited Ruling filed by S. Bloomfield, S. Howard, J. Kelly.0
06/16/1994Entry ordering that Cellnet's motion to amend its complaint is granted; that the motions to dismiss of GTE Mobilnet, NOCTCO companies, New Par, CCI, AirTouch, Youngstown, Cincinnati SMSA, and Ameritech are denied.13
06/13/1994Response to memorandum contra motion to amend complaint by respondents, Northern Ohio Cellular, Akron Cellular, Canton Cellular, and Columbus Cellular Telephone Company and New Par Cellular Communications, Inc., AirTouch, Lorain/Elyria Cellular Telephone Company and Cellular Communications of Mansfield, Inc. filed on behalf of Cellnet by J. Migden.4
06/13/1994Response to memorandum contra motion to amend complaint by respondents, filed on behalf of complainant by J. Migden.0
06/13/1994Response to motion for expedited ruling, filed on behalf of NOCTCO respondents by S. Bloomfield.3
06/10/1994Complainant, Westside Cellular dba Cellnet's memorandum contra motion of respondents, Northern Ohio Cellular, Akron Cellular, Canton Cellular Telephone, Columbus Cellular, Cellular Communications, Inc, Lorain/Elyria Cellular, Pactel Cellular, Inc. and New Par for an extension of time to respond to discovery, filed by J. Migden.5
06/10/1994Reply to response to clarification filed on behalf of complainant by J. Migden.4
06/10/1994Motion for an expedited ruling and memorandum in support filed on behalf of complainant by J. Migden.4
06/01/1994Renewal of motion to dismiss the complaint of respondents, Northern Ohio Cellular, Akron Cellular, Canton Cellular, and Columbus Cellular Telephone Company, New Par, Cellular Communications, Inc., AirTouch, Lorain/Elyria Cellular and Cellular Communications of Mansfield, Inc. by S. Bloomfield.74
06/01/1994Memorandum contra motion to amend complaint, filed on behalf of respondents, Northern Ohio Cellular, Akron Cellular, Canton Cellular and Columbus Cellular Telephone Company and New Par, Cellular Communications, Inc, AirTouch, Lorain/Elyria Cellular Telephone Company and Cellular Communications of Mansfield, Inc. by S. Bloomfield.3
06/01/1994Reply to complainant's clarification, filed on behalf of Ameritech Mobile Communications, Inc. and Cincinnati SMSA Limited Partnership by J. Kelly.6
06/01/1994Response to Cellnet's clarification, filed on behalf of Youngstown Cellular Telephone Company by S. Howard.4
06/01/1994Response to Cellnet's clarification, filed on behalf of Youngstown Cellular Telephone Co. by S. Howard.0
06/01/1994Response to clarification of complainant, filed on behalf of respondent, GTE Mobilnet, by J. Sanders.23
05/31/1994Reply of Ameritech Mobile Communications, Inc. by J. Kelly.4
05/31/1994Reply of GTE Mobilnet to Cellnet's memorandum contra motion for protective order, filed on behalf of GTE Mobilnet by J. Sanders.6
05/26/1994Entry ordering that the motion for extension of time is granted and that all reply memoranda shall be filed on or before June 1, 1994. (JA)2
05/26/1994Entry ordering that the motion for an extension of time is granted and that all reply memoranda shall be filed by 6/1/94. (AE)0
05/25/1994Motion for a motion of time to respond to discovery, filed on behalf of Northern Ohio Cellular, Akron Celluar Telephone Company, Canton Cellular Telephone Company and Celluar Communications, Inc., Lorain/Elyria Cellular Company, PacTel Celluar,, Inc., of Ohio (Now known as AirTouch Celluar of Ohio) and New Par Companies by S. Bloomfield.7
05/24/1994Motion for extension of time to file reply to clarification of Cellnet and request for expedited ruling, filed on behalf of New Par by M. Christensen; Ameritech Mobile Communications by J. Kelly; GTE Mobilnet by J. Sanders; Youngstown Cellular Telephone by S. Howard.6
05/20/1994Memorandum contra motions for protective order, filed on behalf Westside Celluar dba Cellnet by J. Migden.7
05/17/1994Motion to amend complain and memorandum in support filed on behalf of complainant by J. Migden.7
05/17/1994Clarification in response to Commission's inquiry filed on behalf of complainant by J. Migden.160
05/03/1994Motion of GTE Mobilnet, Inc. for protective order filed by J. Sanders.29
05/02/1994Motion for a protective order and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Ameritech Mobile Communications by J. Kelly.28
04/27/1994Entry ordered that the complainant clarify its complaint in accordance with findings (12) and (13) on or before May 17, 1994. (JA)12
01/19/1994Reply of respondents, Northern Ohio Cellular Telephone Company, Akron Cellular Telephone Company, Canton Cellular Telephone Company, and Columbus Cellular Telephone Company, to Cellnet's memorandum contra the motion to dismiss, filed by S. Bloomfield.33
01/19/1994Reply of GTE Mobilnet, Inc. to complaint's memorandum contra motion to dismiss filed by J. Sanders.6
01/19/1994Reply memorandum of Youngstown Cellular Telephone Company filed by S. Howard.15
01/19/1994Reply memorandum of Ameritech Mobile Communications, Inc. and Cincinnati SMSA Limited Partnership filed by J. Kelly.6
01/11/1994Letter stating that the parties have agreed to an extension of time for the respondents' reply to complainant's memorandum contra respondents' motion to dismiss until January 19, 1994, filed by M. Christensen.1
01/03/1994Memorandum contra respondents' motions to dismiss, filed on behalf of complainant by R. Hart.21
12/28/1993Letter stating that a five day extension of the respond to the motion to dismiss filed by the respondents was granted filed by R. Hart.1
12/28/1993Letter confirming that Cellnet was granted a 5 day ex- tension of time to respond to the motion to dismiss filed by respondents, filed on behalf of complainant by R. Hart.0
12/20/1993Letter requesting a brief extensin of time within which to file a reply memorandum to any memorandum contra Mobilnet's motion to dismiss the complaint which might be filed by complainant, filed on behalf of respondent, GTE Mobilnet, by J. Sanders.0
12/06/1993Motion to dismiss the complaint and memorandum in support filed on behalf of respondents, Northern Ohio Cellular, Akron Cellular, Canton Cellular, and Columbus Cellular by S. Bloomfield.29
12/06/1993Motion of Ameritech Mobile Communications, Inc. and Cincinnati SMSA Limited Partnership to dismiss complaint, filed by J. Kelly.15
12/06/1993Answer, motion to dismiss and affirmative defenses of GTE Mobilnet, Inc. by J. Sanders.12
12/06/1993Motion to dismiss and memorandum in support filed on behalf of respondent, Youngstown Cellular Telephone Co., by S. Howard.12
12/06/1993Motion to dismiss the complaint and memorandum in support filed on behalf of respondents, Cellular Communications, Lorain/Elyria Cellular Telephone, Pactel Cellular of Ohio and NewPar by S. Bloomfield.5
11/19/1993Memorandum contra motion for an extension of time, filed on behalf of complainant by R. Hart.4
11/19/1993Entry ordering that respondents should be permitted to file their responses in this case by December 6, 1993. (AE)2
11/15/1993Certificate of service filed on behalf of respondents by M. Christensen.2
11/12/1993Motion for extension of time and memorandum in support, filed on behalf of GTE Mobilnet Inc., by J. Sanders.5
10/26/1993Complaint letter sent to: Mansfield Cellular Telephone Co.1
10/26/1993Complaint letter and copy of complaint mailed to: Canton Cellular Telephone c/o US Corp.1
10/26/1993Complaint letter and copy of complaint mailed to: Ameritech Mobile Communications c/o CT Corp.1
10/26/1993Complaint letter sent to: Akron Cellular Telephone Co.1
10/26/1993Complaint letter and copy of complaint mailed to: Youngstown Cellular Telephone Co.1
10/26/1993Complaint letter and copy of complaint mailed to: Youngs- town Cellular aka Wilcom Cellular Corp.0
10/26/1993Complaint letter and copy of complaint mailed to: GTE Mobilnet, Inc., c/o C.T. Corp. Systems.0
10/26/1993Complaint letter and copy of complaint mailed to: Ameritech Mobile Communications aka Cincinnati SMSA Limited Partner- ship, c/o CT Corp. System.0
10/26/1993Complaint letter and copy of complaint mailed to: Lorain/ Elyria Cellular aka Cellular Communications of Lorain/ Elryia aka Cellular One, c/o U.S.Corporation.0
10/26/1993Complaint letter and copy of complaint mailed to: Canton Cellular aka Cellular Communications of Canton aka Cellular One, c/o U.S. Corporation.0
10/26/1993Complaint letter and copy of complaint mailed to: Akron Cellular aka Cellular Communications of Akron aka Cellular One, c/o U.S. Corporation.0
10/26/1993Motion for a temporary suspension of discovery and request for an immediate ruling filed on behalf of The New Par Companies by K. Trafford. (6 pgs.) Complaint letter and copy of complaint mailed to: Northern Ohio Cellular aka Cellular Communications of Northern Ohio aka Cellular One, c/o U.S. Corporation.0
10/26/1993Complaint letter and copy of complaint mailed to: Mans- field Cellular aka Cellular Communications of Mansfield, aka Cellular One, c/o U.S. Corporation.0
10/26/1993Complaint letter and copy of complaint mailed to: Cellular Communications, Inc.0
10/26/1993Complaint letter mailed to: Northern Ohio Cellular Telephone Co. aka Cellular Communications of Northern Ohio aka Cellular One c/o its statutory agent, US. Corp.1
10/26/1993Complaint letter to Cellular Communications, Inc.1
10/26/1993Complaint letter mailed to: Lorain/Elyria Cellular Telephone c/o US Corp.1
10/26/1993Complaint letter mailed to: GTE Mobilnet, c/o CT Corp.1
10/18/1993In the matter of the complaint Westside Cellular, Inc., dba Cellnet vs GTE Mobilenet, Inc., Ameritech Mobile Communications, Inc., aka Cincinnati SMSA Limited Partnership; Youngstowns Cellular Telephone aka Wilcom Cellular Corporation, Cellular Communications, Inc., Northern Ohio Cellular Telephone Company aka Cellular Communications of Northern Ohio aka Cellular One, Akron Cellular Telephone Company aka Cellular Communications of Akron aka Cellular One, Canton Cellular Telephone Company aka Cellular Communications of Canton aka Cellular One, Lorain/Elyria Cellular Telephone Company aka Cellular Communications of Lorain/Elyria aka Cellular One;Mansfield Cellular Telephone Company aka Cellular Communications of Mansfield aka Cellular One; Columbus Celluar Telephone Company aka Cellular Communications of Columbus aka Cellular One; PacTel Cellular of Ohio, Inc. and New Par aka CCI-PacTel Joint Venture; relative to the alleged unfair, unjust, unreasonable charges.13