DIS - Case Record for 93-1660-TP-PEX Skip to main content

Case Record For:

93-1660-TP-PEX

File a Public Comment
Case Title: DAN HOSTETLER/OHIO BELL
Status: AR-Archived
Industry Code: TP-TELEPHONE
Purpose Code: PEX-Petition for extended area service
Date Opened: 10/6/1993
Date Closed: 6/29/1995
Printable Docket Card Service List
View per page
Date FiledSummaryPages
09/11/1998Correspondence letter filed by R.E. Boals. (1 pg)1
02/18/1998Information Response filed on behalf of respondent, United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint, by M. Arendes, Jr. (22 pgs) (FILED 2/17/98)22
01/16/1998Information response filed on behalf of Sprint by M. Aren- des, Jr. (49 pgs.) (FILED 1/15/98)49
01/14/1998Letter stating that Allnet Communication Services, Inc. dba Frontier Communications Services has reported the data re- quested to Ameritech and Sprint via fax, filed by M. Nighan. (1 pg.)1
12/19/1997Affidavit of Kenton J. Pfister filed on behalf of AT&T Com- munications of Ohio by J. Troup. (11 pgs.)11
12/01/1997Motion for an extension of time and memorandum in support filed on behalf of MCI Telecommunications Corp. by J. Sanders and M. Berns. (6 pgs.)6
10/17/1997Entry dismissing this case and closing it of record. (AE) (8 pgs.)8
10/03/1997Entry scheduling a conference at 10:00 a.m. on October 6, 1997 at the Commission offices. (AE) (2 pgs.)2
09/08/1997Entry canceling the conference scheduled for September 9, 1997. (AE) (2 pgs.)2
08/04/1997Entry ordering that Wayne County Connection and Chester Simons dba Starlink be joined as respondents to this case, and that they comply with the directives set forth in Finding 3; scheduling a conference at 10:00 a.m. on September 9, 1997, at the Commission offices. (AE) (3 pgs.)3
06/25/1997Additional information filed on behalf of complainants by J. Bednarz. (2 pgs.)2
05/21/1997Letter requesting a statement as to the status of this case filed by J. Bednarz. Copy of commission's response to Ms. Bednarz by P. Duffy. (2 pgs)2
05/02/1997Missing page of information filed on April 7, 1997, state- ment of additional factual information & request for the "exclusion" of calling rate factor in the above case filed by J. Bednarz. (filed on 5/1/97) (2 pgs.)2
04/21/1997Response to petitioners' request for reconsideration, filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by C. Rawlings. (5 pgs.)5
04/21/1997Memorandum contra to complainant's request for rehearing, filed on behalf of respondent, Sprint(United), by T. Jacobs. (5 pgs.)5
04/08/1997Correspondence letter supporting the petition, filed by M. Wyss, Sugar Creek Township Trustee. (1 pg.)1
04/07/1997Additional factual information filed by J. Bednarz. (11 pgs.)11
03/27/1997Entry ordering that the complainants file any additional factual information in support of their petitions by April 7, 1997; that the involved telephone companies shall file their responses to the complainants' request by April 21, 1997; that the complainants shall have until April 28, 1997 to respond to the filings made by the involved telephone companies. (AE) (2 pgs.)2
03/21/1997Initial response to the Commission's February 27, 1997 entry filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by C. Rawlings. (3 pgs.)3
03/17/1997Additional petitions filed on behalf of complainants by J. Bednarz. (164 pgs.)164
03/11/1997Motion for extension of time filed on behalf of complainants by J. Bednarz. (1 pg.)1
02/27/1997Entry ordering that the complainants file any additional factual information in support of their petitions by March 7, 1997; that the involved telephone companies shall file their responses to the complainants' request by March 21, 1997; that the complainants shall have until March 28, 1997 to respond to the filings made by the involved telephone companies. (AE) (2 pgs.)2
01/27/1997Additional signature and other pertinent information filed by J. Bednarz. (Part 2 of 2)0
01/27/1997Additional signatures and other pertinent information filed by J. Bednarz. (656 pgs.) (part 1 of 2)656
11/12/1996Correspondence letter supporting the petition, filed by A. Chizmadia. (2 pgs.)2
10/03/1996Correspondence letter supporting the petition, filed by A. Chizmadia. (1 pg.) (FILED 10/1/96)1
05/20/1996Revised tariff, PUCO No. 6, Section C, 9th sheet 19, filed on behalf of United Telephone Co. by G. Gratz. (2 pgs.)2
01/17/1996Tariff, PUCO No. 6, Check Sheet 1, Preface, 10th sheet 2; Section C, 8th sheet 19, filed on behalf of United Tele- phone Co. by G. Gratz. (5 pgs.)5
01/16/1996Tariff, PUCO No. 20, Part 4, Section 1, 3rd sheet 8, filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by D. McKenzie. (4 pgs.)4
12/06/1995Letter stating the implementation date for two-way flat-rate extended area service (EAS) between Orrville and Dalton is January 21, 1996 filed on behalf of United Telephone by G. Gratz. (1 pg.)1
11/30/1995Supplemental Entry ordered that Ameritech Ohio is relieved of the requirment to inform Dalton exchange subscribers of of optional calling services. (3 pgs.)3
10/31/1995Information response filed on behalf of respondent, Ameri- tech Ohio, by C. Rawlings. (2 pgs.)2
10/20/1995Supplemental information response of Ameritech Ohio filed by C. Rawlings. (3 pgs.)3
09/27/1995Supplemental information response filed on behalf of respon- dent, Ameritech Ohio, by C. Rawlings. (5 pgs.)5
08/04/1995Supplemental information response of Ameritech Ohio filed by C. Rawlings. (6 pgs.)6
06/29/1995Opinion and Order ordering that EAS between Dalton and the Kidron exchange and Dalton and the Wooster exchange are denied, EAS between the Dalton and Orrville exchange is granted and that LCI's motion for partial waiver of filing requirements is granted. (21 pgs.)0
06/16/1995Correspondence letter supporting the petition, filed by L. Stainbrook, Orrville Public Library. (1 pg.)0
06/16/1995Correspondence letter supporting the petition, filed by L. McAninch, Orrville City Schools. (4 pgs.)0
06/15/1995Affidavit of Jacqueline M. Young and certificate of service filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by J. Matz. (3 pgs.)0
06/14/1995Correspondence letter filed on behalf of Gerber Lumber and Hardware by L. Miller. (1 pg.)0
06/12/1995Correspondence letter supporting the petition, filed by L. Stainbrook. (1 pg.)0
06/05/1995Information response filed on behalf of respondent, Ameri- tech Ohio, by C. Rawlings. (12 pgs.)0
06/01/1995Supplemental information response filed on behalf of respondent, United Telephone, by S. Williams. (2 pgs.)0
06/01/1995Supplemental testimony of Dennis R. McNary filed on behalf of respondent, United Telephone, by S. Williams. (11 pgs.)0
05/17/1995Entry ordering that the May 12, 1995 entry of the Commission be reaffirmed, and that United and Ameritech Ohio file all previously ordered cost information by 6/5/95; that the com- plainants file a statement by 6/16/95 indicating whether they seek a hearing on the cost information. (AE) (2 pgs.)0
05/12/1995Motion requesting that the phone companies, both United and Ameritech, be denied any more time on this case, filed on behalf of complainants by C. Dwyer. (1 pg.)0
05/12/1995Entry ordering that the motions of Ameritech Ohio and United be granted, and all cost information be submitted by 6/5/95. (AE) (3 pgs.)0
05/11/1995Entry ordering that the motions of Ameritech Ohio and United be granted and all cost information be submitted by 6/5/95. (AE) (3 pgs.)0
05/09/1995Additional information filed on behalf of complainant by C. Dwyer. (2 pgs.)0
04/28/1995Memorandum on behalf of Ameritech Ohio in response to motion of United Telephone Company of Ohio filed by C. Rawlings. (3 pgs.)0
04/27/1995Correspondence letter supporting the petition, filed by R. Amstutz. (1 pg.)0
04/26/1995Transcript filed for hearing held 4/4/95, (SF), 464 pgs., Submitted. (Dalton, Ohio)0
04/20/1995Motion for extension of time filed on behalf of respondent, United Telephone, by S. Williams. (5 pgs.)0
04/12/1995Correspondence letter supporting the petition, filed by J. Hurley. (1 pg.)0
04/12/1995Correspondence letter supporting the petition, filed by Janice & Harold Purdy. (1 pg.)0
04/12/1995Correspondence letter supporting the petition, filed by K. Steiner. (1 pg.)0
04/12/1995Entry ordering that Ameritech and United provide the requested cost and revenue information by 5/15/95; that the spokespersons file a statement by 5/26/95 indicating whether the compainants desire the Commission to hold a further hearing on investments, costs, and revenue impact associated with the implementation of flat-rate EAS between the Dalton and Orrville, Kidron, and Wooster exchanges. (AE) (4 pgs.)0
04/06/1995Correspondence letter supporting the petition, filed by Rev. W. Jordan. (1 pg.)0
04/03/1995Correspondence letter supporting the petition, filed by B. Oyer. (2 pgs.)0
03/30/1995Transcript filed for hearing held 3/21/95, (SF), 3 pgs., Con't.0
03/24/1995Proof of Publication filed. (Wayne County) (1 pg.)0
03/17/1995Correspondence letters regarding the petition, filed by J. Bednarz and various subscribers. (82 pgs.)0
03/14/1995Testimony of Dennis McNary filed on behalf of respondent, United Telephone, by S. Williams. (13 pgs.)0
03/14/1995Testimony of Jacqueling M. Young filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by C. Rawlings. (28 pgs.)0
02/23/1995Correspondence letter supporting the petition, filed by Mrs. William R. Welch. (2 pgs.)0
02/08/1995Legal Notice sent to: The Daily Record (Wayne Co.) Certified Mail.0
02/06/1995Entry scheduling a public hearing at 10:00 a.m. on 3/21/95 at the Dalton-Kidron YMCA, Dalton, Ohio; any entity seek- ing intervention in this matter must do so by 3/1/95. (AE) (4 pgs.)0
01/30/1995Letter stating that Cheryl Dwyer will now be representing the subscribers of the Dalton exchange, and request for a hearing, filed on behalf of complainants by D. Hostetler. (2 pgs.)0
08/08/1994Motion for partial waiver of filing requirements filed on behalf of LCI International Telecom Corp. by J. Heflinger.0
07/28/1994Additional information response of respondent, United Telephone filed by S. Williams.0
07/18/1994Information response filed on behalf of respondent, Ohio Bell, by C. Rawlings.0
07/12/1994Affidavit filed by J. Sanders.0
06/29/1994Entry ordering that MCI be granted an extension of time, until July 15, 1994, to provide the calling information ordered in the March 18, 1994 Commission entry in this case to Ohio Bell and United, and file the appropriate affidavit with the Commission; that Ohio Bell be granted an extension of time, until July 29, 1994, to provide the calling information to the Commission and the spokesperson for the complainants; that United recalculate the calling information submitted on June 23, 1994, to incorporate MCI information, and be granted an extension of time until July 29, 1994, to resubmit the revised calling information to the Commission and the spokesperson for the complainants; scheduling a settlement conference at 1:00 p.m. on 8/9/94 at the Commission offices. (AE)0
06/24/1994Answer filed on behalf of respondent, Ohio Bell, by C. Rawlings.0
06/23/1994Information Response of Respondent, United Telephone Company of Ohio filed by S. Williams.0
06/23/1994Answer of Respondent, United Telephone Company of Ohio filed by S. Williams.0
06/23/1994Motion for extension of time within which to file calling data and memorandum in support of motion filed on behalf of MCI Telecommunications Corporation by J. Sanders.0
06/06/1994Affidavit of Mary A. Hull filed on behalf of respondent, Sprint Communications, by M. Hull.0
06/06/1994Affidavit of Brenda McKinley filed on behalf of respondent, United Telephone Long Distance, by B. McKinley.0
06/06/1994Affidavit of Patricia Butwin filed on behalf of respondent, AT&T Communications, by J. Troup.0
06/03/1994Letter certifying that Allnet Communications Services reported the required calling information to Ohio Bell, United Telehone, GTE and Western Reserve, on June 1, 1994, filed on behalf of respondent, Allnet, by J. Nicholls.0
05/31/1994Affidivit informing the Commission that LCI has filed the required calling information with both Ohio Bell Telephone and United Telephone, filed on behalf of respondent, LCI International, by J. Mushrush.0
03/18/1994Entry ordering that AT&T, MCI, LCI, Sprint, Allnet, and UTLD shall provide the information required by Finding 3 to Ohio Bell and United and file the appropriate affidavit by 6/6/94; that Ohio Bell and United shall file their written answers by 6/24/94; that Ohio Bell and United pro- vide the information required by Finding 5 by 6/24/94; scheduling a settlement conference at 1:00 p.m. on 6/30/94 at the Commission offices. (AE)0
10/06/1993In the matter of the petition of Dan Hostetler and numerous subscribers of the Dalton exchange of Ohio Bell Telephone Company for extended area service into the Kidron, Orrville, and Wooster exchanges of Ohio Bell Telephone Company.0