DIS - Case Record for 93-0913-TP-CSS Skip to main content
      
      
CASE NUMBER: 93-0913-TP-CSS
CASE DESCRIPTION: LYN LOUCKS/CHILLICOTHE TELEPHONE
DOCUMENT SIGNED ON: 4/24/2024
DATE OF SERVICE: ________________________________________
04/06/1995 Supreme Court Case returned. #93-2419 (1) Vol.-Destroyed.
12/28/1993 Supreme Court Transmittal papers.
11/29/1993 Notice of appeal filed on behalf A. Corbin and L. Loucks filed by OCC by D. Bergman.
09/30/1993 Entry denying OCC's application for rehearing, and the Commission's Order issued on August 5, 1993 is reaffirmed.
09/17/1993 Memorandum contra application for rehearing, filed on behalf of respondent, Chillicothe Telephone Company, by A. Korkosz.
09/07/1993 Application for rehearing and memorandum in support filed on behalf of OCC by D. Bergmann.
08/05/1993 Entry granting CTC's motion to consolidate Case Nos. 93-685-TP-CSS and 93-913-TP-CSS and dismissing complaints. Dissenting Opinion of Commissioner Richard M. Fanelly. Concurring Opinion of Chairman Craig A. Glazer.
07/01/1993 Letter stating that the Chillicothe Telephone Company will not file any reply memorandum and urging that an entry granting the motion be issued, filed by A. Korkosz.
06/29/1993 Memorandum contra CTC's motion and memorandum to con- solidate and dismiss, filed on behalf of OCC by Y. Ranft.
06/16/1993 Reply memorandum filed on behalf of respondent, Chillicothe Telephone Company, by A. Korkosz.
06/11/1993 Motion and memorandum to consolidate and dismiss, filed on behalf of respondent, Chillicothe Telephone Co., by A. Korkosz.
06/10/1993 Notice of appearance of counsel filed on behalf of OCC by Y. Ranft.
06/08/1993 Complaint letter and copy of complaint mailed to: Thomas McKee, Chillicothe Telephone Company.
06/08/1993 Complaint letter and copy of complaint mailed to: Jack Anthony, Chillicothe Telephone Company.
06/07/1993 In the matter of the complaint of Lyn Loucks and various subscribers of the Chillicothe Exchange (vs) Chillicothe Telephone Company relative to the alleged unjust, unfair, and unreasonable changes associated with the company's application to offer Caller ID and Call Return.