DIS - Case Record for 93-0540-TP-COI Skip to main content

Case Record For:

93-0540-TP-COI

File a Public Comment
Case Title: CALLING PARTY'S NUMBER VIA SS7
Status: CL-CLOSED
Industry Code: TP-TELEPHONE
Purpose Code: COI-Commission inquiry
Date Opened: 3/31/1993 1:00:00 AM
Date Closed: 5/24/2018
Printable Docket Card Service List
View per page
Date FiledSummaryPages
05/24/2018Case Action Form closing case electronically filed by Michelle A. Green on behalf of Public Utilities Commission of Ohio.2
07/26/2007Service Notice8
07/25/2007Entry ordering that Embarq's July 16, 2007, requests to withdraw its waiver applications in these cases are granted.3
07/16/2007Request that the motion be withdrawn on behalf of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Embarq, filed by B. Donahue.2
07/09/2007Memorandum Contra Embarq's application for waivers of various disclosure requirements by the Office of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel, The Appalachian People's Action Coalition, and Board of County Commissioners, Lucas County, Ohio filed by T. Etter.34
06/20/2007Application for waiver of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Embarq filed by J. Stewart.10
06/12/2006Memorandum contra AT&T Ohio's request for waivers filed by T. Etter, Ohio Consumers' Counsel; M. Smalz, Appalachian People's Action Coalition; E. Jacobs, Edgemont Neighborhood Coalition; K. Bruce, City of Toledo; S. McAdams, City of Maumee; B. Ballenger, City of Northwood; P. Goldberg, City of Oregon; P. Gwyn, City of Perrysburg; P. Skaff, City of Holland; J. Moan, City of Sylvania; L. Keiffer, Lucas County; J. Meissner, Consumers for Fair Utility Rates and The Neighborhood Environmental Coalition.30
05/31/2006AT&T Ohio's request for waivers business office issues filed by M. Fenlon.10
07/01/1998Annual report regarding the status of SS7 technology, filed on behalf of Cincinnati SMSA Limited Partnership by L. Reed1
06/20/1998Informational filing filed on behalf of AirTouch Cellular, Inc. by J. Bentine.2
07/08/1997Submission of report of GTE Mobilnet of Ohio Limited Partnership and Ohio RSA #3 Limited Partnership by T. Lodge.13
06/30/1997Informational filing of Airtouch Cellular, Inc. filed by J. Bentine.5
06/30/1997Informational filing submitted on behalf of Airtouch Cellu- lar, Inc. by J. Bentine. (5 pgs.)5
06/27/1997Annual report on status of implementation of SS7 technology filed on behalf of Cincinnati SMSA Limited Partnership by L. Reed. (1 pg.)1
06/27/1997Annual report on status of implementation of SS7 technology filed on behalf of Cincinnati SMSA Limited Partnership by L. Reed. (1 pg.)1
05/12/1997Submission of report filed on behalf of 360 Degree Communications by T. Lodge.7
01/30/1997Informational filing, filed on behalf of AirTouch cellular, Inc by J. Bentine.5
01/17/1997Letter regarding annual report, filed on behalf of Cincinnati SMSA Limited Partnership by L. Reed.1
07/15/1996Status report for New Par filed on behalf of Cellular One by C. Dziuban. (3 pgs.)3
09/27/1995SS7 plans and CPN blocking capabilities filed on behalf of GTE Mobilnet of Ohio Limited Partnership; GTE Mobilnet Incorporated; and Ohio RSA #3 Limited Partnership by J. Sanders. (1 pg.)1
07/07/1995Annual report on status of implementation of SS7 technology filed on behalf of Cincinnati SMSA Limited Partnership by S. Cassioppi. (1 pg.)0
07/03/1995Letter stating that West Virginia Cellular Telephone Corp. (WVCTC) has implemented an SS7 network for transporting TCAP messages only, filed by R. Rowlenson. (1 pg.)0
06/26/1995Status report for New Par on behalf of the cellular licensees comprising the CCI-AirTouch Joint Venture (doing business as Cellular One), filed by C. Dziuban. (3 pgs.)0
12/08/1994Report of the implementation of SS7 and other signalling technologies, filed on behalf of Central Ohio Cellular, Inc. by M. Dortch. (2 pgs.)0
08/11/1994Notice of withdrawal of counsel and designation of new trial attorney, filed on behalf of OCC by Y. Ranft. (2)0
07/21/1994Memorandum in support of petition for clarification, etc. of Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company, filed on behalf of Little Miami Communications Corporation by J. Prohaska.0
07/21/1994Memorandum in support of petition for clarification, etc. of Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company, filed on behalf of The Doylestown Telephone Company by J. Prohaska.0
07/15/1994Petition for clarification or, in the alternative, request for waiver filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell Telephone Co. by T. Taylor.0
07/07/1994Letter stating that West Virginia Cellular Telephone Corp. has not implemented SS7 signaling or other technology that allows for CPN disclosure in any part of its service area, filed by R. Rowlenson.0
06/30/1994Report and request for consideration as timely filed, submitted on behalf of Sprint Cellular Company by T. Lodge.0
06/30/1994Annual report on status of implementation of SS7 technology filed on behalf of Parkersburg Cellular Telephone, Wheeling Cellular Telephone, and McClang, Inc. by J. Sanders.0
06/30/1994Annual report on status of implementation of SS7 technology filed on behalf of Cincinnati SMSA Limited Partnership by S. Cassioppi.0
06/28/1994Status report filed on behalf of Great Seal Cellular Limited Partnership by M. Christensen.0
06/28/1994Status report filed on behalf of New Par by S. Bloomfield.0
06/21/1994Letter stating SS7 plans and CPN blocking capabilities filed on behalf of GTE Mobilnet of Ohio Limited Partnership, GTE Mobilnet Incorporated, and Ohio RSA #3 Limited Partnership by J. Sanders.0
05/18/1994Entry denying the application for rehearing filed by ODVN and the Commission's order issued on March 30, 1994, is reaffirmed and clarified in accordance with Finding 5.6
05/09/1994Memorandum contra of Ameritech Ohio to the application for rehearing of the Ohio Domestic Violence Network filed by W. Hunt.0
05/05/1994Reply comments filed on behalf of United Telephone Company by S. Williams.0
05/05/1994Reply comments to the comments of The Ohio Public Communi- cations Assoc. filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by W. Hunt.0
04/29/1994Request for clarification filed on behalf of The New Par Companies by M. Christensen.0
04/27/1994Application for rehearing filed on behalf of the Ohio Domestic Violence Network by J. Migden.0
04/25/1994Letter stating that AT&T Communications of Ohio will not file comments in this docket, filed by R. Charleston.0
04/25/1994Supplemental comments filed on behalf of United Telephone Company by S. Williams.0
04/25/1994Comments filed on behalf of The Ohio Public Communications Association by M. Grady.0
03/30/1994Finding and Order stating that the blocking requirements and customer notice set forth in Appendix A and B are adopted and that cellular carrier operating in the state of Ohio shall file within 90 days of this finding and order and annually thereafter an update concerning the deployment of SS7 and CPN blocking capabilities within its Ohio service territory and that final ruling on this issue of the availability of blocking on COCOT's will be reserved pending receipt of comments and reply comments on that issue.16
09/28/1993Certificate of service filed on behalf of MCI Telecommuni- cations Corp. by J. Patchen.0
09/28/1993Reply comments filed on behalf of OCC by Y. Ranft and R. Ceisler.0
09/28/1993Certificate of service filed on behalf of Ohio State Legal Services Association and Action Ohio by M. Smalz.0
09/28/1993Reply comments filed on behalf of Ohio Bell by W. Hunt.0
09/28/1993Reply filed on behalf of The New Par Companies by S. Bloomfield.0
09/28/1993Comments filed on behalf of the Ohio Domestic Violence Network by J. Migden.0
09/28/1993Reply comments filed on behalf of United Telephone by S. Williams.0
09/27/1993Certrificate of service filed on behalf of Ohio Bell by W. Hunt.0
09/27/1993Certificate of service filed on behalf of United Telephone Company by S. Williams.0
09/23/1993Letter of support filed on behalf of National Association for the Advancement of Colored People filed by J. Daniel.0
09/22/1993Certificate of service filed on behalf of OCC by Y. Ranft.0
09/21/1993Certificate of service filed on behalf of The New Par Companies by S. Bloomfield.0
09/20/1993Certificate of service filed on behalf of Alltel Ohio and Western Reserve Telephone by T. Lodge.0
09/17/1993Certificate of service filed on behalf of AT&T Communica- tions of Ohio by J. Troup.0
09/15/1993Entry ordering that all entities who have filed initial comments comply with the directives set forth in Finding (3). (AE)2
09/14/1993Recommendations of the Cincinnati Coalition on Domestic Violence by D. Trujillo. (FILED 9/13/93)0
09/14/1993OCC's initial comments and responses filed by Y. Ranft and R. Ceisler. (FILED 9/13/93)0
09/14/1993Comments of GTE North Incorporated filed by J. Stewart. FILED 9/13/93)0
09/14/1993Comments of the New Par Companies filed by S. Bloofield. (FILED 9/13/93)0
09/14/1993Comments of MCI Telecommunications Corporation filed by J. Patchen. (FILED 9/13/93)0
09/13/1993Comments filed on behalf of the Ohio Domestic Violence Network by J. Migden.0
09/13/1993Letter stating that AT&T Communications will not file initial comments, filed by R. Charleston.0
09/13/1993Comments filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell by M. Longen- ecker, Jr.0
09/13/1993Comments filed on behalf of United Telephone Company by S. Williams.0
09/13/1993Initial comments of the Ohio Bell Telephone Company filed by W. Hunt.0
09/13/1993Joint comments of Alltel Ohio, Inc. and the Western Reserve Telephone Company in response to Commissions entry of August 12, 1993 filed by T. Lodge.0
09/09/1993Letter stating that the Chillicothe Telephone Company does not intend to file initial comments, but wishes to be included on the service list for comments and reply comments, filed by A. Korkosz.0
09/02/1993Initial comments and response to proposals filed on behalf of the Ohio Association of Chiefs of Police by J. Gilchrist.0
08/12/1993Entry ordering that all interested entities are invited to file comments and reply comments to the proposals, set forth in Appendices A and B, and responses to the questions set forth in Appendix C, by September 13, 1993, and September 28, 1993; scheduling a conference at 1:30 p.m. on August 24, 1993, Hearing Rooms 11-B and C, Commission offices.10
08/12/1993Entry ordering that all interested entities are invited to file comments and reply comments to the proposals, set forth in Appendices A and B, and responses to the questions set forth in Appendix C, by September 13, 1993, and September 28, 1993; scheduling a conference at 1:30 p.m. on August 24, 1993, Hearing Rooms 11-B and C, Commission offices.10
07/20/1993Letter to the Commission regarding their interest in this case on behalf of residential consumers, filed by W. Spratley, OCC.0
03/31/1993In the matter of the Commission ordered investigation into the Forwarding of the Calling Party's Number via SS7 or Class Technology.0