Date Filed | Summary | Pages |
05/26/1994 | Order dismissing this case and closing it of record. | 0 |
09/30/1993 | Entry granting Ohio Bell's application for rehearing or clarification to the extent delineated in Finding 4; that Ohio Bell's remaining arguments in its application for rehearing or clarification of the Commission's August 5, 1993 Finding & Order is denied in accordance with Finding 5. | 0 |
09/07/1993 | Application for rehearing and/or clarification and memor- andum in support filed on behalf of applicant by W. Hunt. | 0 |
08/05/1993 | Entry granting application with the restrictions contained in Finding 4; that the joint motion to intervene submitted by PhoneTel and OPCA is denied; that OTA's motion for per- mission to file an amicus memorandum in denied. | 0 |
08/02/1993 | Ordinance No. 2159-92 passed on June 14, 1993, and effective July 24, 1993, filed on behalf of applicant by J. Matz. | 0 |
06/23/1993 | Motion for leave to file an amicus memorandum in support of the application and memorandum in support, filed on behalf of the Ohio Telephone Association by J. Prohaska. | 0 |
04/26/1993 | Motion to intervene filed on behalf of PhoneTel Technologies Inc. and the Ohio Public Communications Association by R. Hart. | 0 |
03/02/1993 | In the matter of the revision of the minimum telephone service standards as set forth in Chapter 4901:1-5 of the Ohio Administrative Code, filed on behalf of Ohio Bell Telephone Company. (FILED 2/26/93) | 0 |