DIS - Case Record for 92-1953-TP-CSS Skip to main content

Case Record For:

92-1953-TP-CSS

File a Public Comment
Case Title: GREG HART COM/OHIO BELL ET AL
Status: AR-Archived
Industry Code: TP-TELEPHONE
Purpose Code: CSS-Complaint on service or safety
Date Opened: 10/30/1992
Date Closed: 11/22/1995
Printable Docket Card Service List
View per page
Date FiledSummaryPages
11/22/1995Entry dismissing and closing case. (3 pgs.)3
11/03/1995Letter requesting that this complaint be dismissed with prejudice, filed on behalf of complainant by G. Hart. (1 pg.)1
10/31/1995Transcript filed for hearing held 10/17/95, (JJ) (11 pgs.) Submitted.11
10/10/1995Letter stating that complainant has no objection to Ameri- tech's withdrawal, filed by G. Hart. (1 pg.)1
10/10/1995Proof of Publication filed. (1 pg.) (Richand County)1
10/04/1995Motion to dismiss and memorandum in support filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by M. Mulcahy. (9 pgs.)9
09/26/1995Proof of Publication filed. (Cuyahoga County) (1 pg.)1
09/11/1995Legal Notice sent to: Plain Dealer (Cuyahoga Co.) & News- Journal (Richland Co.) Certified Mail.0
09/06/1995Letter informing the Commission that Hahn Loeser & Parks is withdrawing as legal counsel for the complainant, the Ohio Public Communications Association, filed by J. Migden. (1 pg.)1
07/20/1995Entry ordering that Cincinnati Bell be dismissed from this matter in accordance with finding (5), and set for hearing and legal notice be published in accordance with findings (6) and (7). (AE) (5 pgs.)5
07/14/1995Complainants' clarification of parties filed by J. Migden. (4 pgs.)4
05/18/1995Motion and memorandum in support filed on behalf of The Ohio Public Communications Assn. by J. Migden. (4 pgs.)0
05/18/1995Entry ordering that OPCA's motion for an extension is granted and the prehearing is rescheduled to 10:00 a.m. on 5/23/95 at the Commission offices. (AE) (2 pgs.)0
05/12/1995Entry scheduling the status conference at 10:00 a.m. on 5/19/95 at the Commission offices. (AE) (2 pgs.)0
04/14/1995Complainant's statement of intent to proceed filed by J. Migden. (3 pgs)0
03/23/1995Entry ordering that complainants docket a response by 4/14/95 explaining whether they desire to proceed to hearing or whether they wish to dismiss their complaints at this time. (AE) (2 pgs.)0
06/24/1994Voluntary dismissal of Cincinnati Bell Telephone Co., filed on behalf of complainants by J. Migden.0
05/19/1994Memorandum contra complainants' motion to compel discovery filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by W. Hunt.0
05/09/1994Motion to compel responses to discovery filed on behalf of the complainants by M. Grady.0
12/21/1993Entry scheduling a second prehearing conference on 5/17/94 at 11:00 a.m. at the Commission offices. (AE)0
12/01/1993Entry ordering that the determinations concerning reasonable grounds for complaint and the motions to dismiss are reaffirmed in accordance with Finding 3; scheduling a prehearing conference at 10:00 a.m. on 12/20/93 at the Commission offices. (AE)0
11/08/1993Answer filed on behalf of respondent, Ohio Bell, by W. Hunt.0
11/08/1993Answer filed on behalf of respondent, United Telephone Company of Ohio, by S. Williams.0
10/19/1993Entry ordering that the respondents' motion for leave to file answers in granted and that each individual respondent file its answer no later than Noverber 8, 1993, and that the motion for reconsideration is held in abeyance. (AE)0
09/27/1993Reply memorandum in support of motion for leave to file answers and for reconsideration of the finding of reason- able grounds, filed on behalf of respondents, Ohio Bell by W. Hunt, Cincinnati Bell by M. Longenecker, Jr., and United Telephone Company by S. Williams.0
09/17/1993Memorandum contra motion for leave to file answers and for reconsideration of the finding of reasonable grounds, filed on behalf of complainants by R. Hart.0
08/30/1993Motion for leave to file answers and for reconsideration of the finding of reasonable grounds, filed on behalf of Ohio Bell by W. Hunt, Cincinnati Bell by M. Longenecker, Jr., and United Telephone by S. Williams.0
08/17/1993Entry ordering that an expedited ruling be issued in accordance with Finding 4; that, in accordance with Finding 5, the responents' motion for a continuance is denied. (AE)0
08/16/1993Memorandum contra motion for continuance filed on behalf of complainant by R. Hart.0
08/10/1993Motion for continuance pending ruling on motions to dismiss and request for expedited ruling and memorandum in support filed on behalf of respondents, Ohio Bell by W. Hunt, Cincinnati Bell by M. Longenecker, and United Telephone by S. Williams.0
07/20/1993Entry scheduling a prehearing conference at 10:00 a.m. on 8/19/93 at the Commission offices; that GTE is dismissed as a party to this matter; that the OPCA, Infosystems, and Hart have limited standing to prosecute this complaint; that reasonable grounds for complaint have been stated in order to proceed with this matter. (AE)0
12/29/1992Voluntary dismissal of GTE North, Inc. from this complaint, filed on behalf of complainants by R. Hart.0
12/21/1992Reply to memorandum contra motion to dismiss, filed on behalf of respondent, Cincinnati Bell, by M. Longenecker, Jr.0
12/21/1992Reply memorandum in support of the motion to dismiss of the Ohio Bell Telephone Comapny, filed by W. Hunt.0
12/18/1992Reply memorandum filed on behalf of respondent, United Telephone, by S. Williams.0
12/10/1992Memorandum contra motions to dismiss filed by Ohio Bell Telephone Company, United Telephone Company, Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company, and GTE North, Inc., filed on behalf of complainants by R. Hart.0
12/07/1992Entry ordering that complainants shall have until 12/10/92 in which to file their memorandum contra the respondents' motions to dismiss; that respondents shall have the appropriate amount of time in which to reply. (AE)0
12/04/1992Motion for extension of time to file their memorandum contra the motions to dismiss, together with a request for an expedited ruling, filed on behalf of complainant by J. Migden.0
11/23/1992Motion to dismiss and memorandum in support filed on behalf of respondent, United Telephone, by S. Williams.0
11/23/1992Motion to dismiss and memorandum in support filed on behalf of respondent, Cincinnati Bell, by M. Longen- ecker, Jr.0
11/23/1992Motion to dismiss and memorandum in support filed on behalf of respondent, GTE North, by J. Stewart.0
11/20/1992Motion to dismiss of the Ohio Bell Telephone Company by W. Hunt.0
11/03/1992Complaint letter and copy of complaint mailed to: GTE North, Incorporated, office of Joseph Stewart.0
11/03/1992Complaint letter and copy of complaint mailed to: Ohio Bell Telephone, office of the vice president.0
11/03/1992Complaint letter and copy of complaint mailed to: Cincinnati Bell Telephone, office of the vice president.0
11/03/1992Complaint letter and copy of complaint mailed to: United Telephone Co. of Ohio, office of the president.0
10/30/1992In the matter of the complaint of Greg Hart Communications, Inc.; Infosystems Resources, Inc.; and The Ohio Public Communications Association (vs) The Ohio Bell Telephone Company; The Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company; United Telephone Company; and GTE North Incorporated and a motion for order requiring a hearing for the purpose of develop- ing a common cost methodology with respect to pay phone service.0