Date Filed | Summary | Pages |
02/15/1995 | Letter requesting that its rights be preserved under the stipulation, and stating that Denison has made numerous contacts with respresentatives of Alltel Ohio in an effort to accomplish a new agreement, filed on behalf of complain- ant by W. Newcomb, Jr. (7 pgs.) | 0 |
07/15/1992 | Entry approving the stipulation and recommendation entered into between Denison and Alltel and closing case. | 0 |
06/17/1992 | Stipulation and recommendation filed on behalf of complain- ant by W. Newcomb, Jr. and respondent by T. Lodge. | 0 |
01/16/1992 | Entry denying Denison's 11/20/91 motion for order directing respondent to refrain from charging for message rate service and scheduling a settlement conference for Friday 2/7/92 at 9:00 a.m. at the Commission. (AE) | 0 |
12/12/1991 | Answer filed on behalf of respondent, Alltel, Ohio, Inc., by T. Lodge. | 0 |
11/27/1991 | Response to motion for order directing respondent to refrain from charging for message rate service pending resolution of this case and request for expedited ruling, filed on behalf of respondent, Alltel Ohio, by T. Lodge. | 0 |
11/22/1991 | Complaint letter and copy of complaint sent to: Alltel Ohio, Inc., office of the vice president. | 0 |
11/20/1991 | Motion for order directing respondent to refrain from charging for message rate service pending resolution of this case and request for expedited ruling and memorandum in support filed on behalf of complaint by S. Howard. | 0 |
11/20/1991 | In the matter of the complaint of Denison University (vs) Alltel Ohio, Inc. relative to the alleged unreasonable and unlawful imposition of message rates and inadequate service. | 0 |