| Date Filed | Summary | Pages |
| 01/07/1993 | Entry dismissing case with prejudice and closing of record. | 0 |
| 12/28/1992 | Transcript filed for hearing held 12/9/92, (GL), 13 pgs., Submitted. | 0 |
| 12/10/1992 | Proof of Publication filed. (Summit County) | 0 |
| 12/09/1992 | Renewal of its motion to dismiss and memorandum in support filed on behalf of respondent, Ohio Edison, by J. Burk. | 0 |
| 12/09/1992 | Subpoena for hearing to Virgil Cochran, as agent for Thomas Cochran, filed on behalf of the PUCO staff by G. Lent. | 0 |
| 11/30/1992 | Motion for issuance of subpoena duces tecum filed on behalf of respondent, Ohio Edison, by J. Burk. | 0 |
| 10/08/1992 | Entry scheduling hearing on 12/9/92 at 10:00 a.m. at the Commission office; except for the represented issue, the rulings of our attorney examiner in this case are affirmed. | 0 |
| 04/21/1992 | Transcript filed for hearing held 4/7/92, (SD), 18 pgs., submitted. | 0 |
| 04/17/1992 | Memorandum contra complainant's notice of interlocutory appeal filed on behalf of respondent, Ohio Edison, by J. Burk. | 0 |
| 04/16/1992 | Affidavit of disqualification of the Honorable Attorney Examiner Steven J. Deerwester in this matter, filed on behalf of complainant by V. Cochran. | 0 |
| 04/15/1992 | Proof of Publication filed. (Summit County) | 0 |
| 04/13/1992 | Correspondence letter to S. Deerwester, PUCO staff, from V. Cochran, complainant. | 0 |
| 04/13/1992 | Notice of interlocutory appeal and notice of appeal of oral announcement of Attorney Examiner, filed on behalf of complainants by T. Cochran and V. Cochran. | 0 |
| 04/07/1992 | Second amended complaint filed on behalf of the complainant by Virgil and Thomas Cochran. | 0 |
| 04/07/1992 | Motion filed on behalf of the complainant by Virgil and Thomas Cochran. | 0 |
| 04/01/1992 | Withdrawal of its motion to dismiss filed on behalf of respondent, Ohio Edison, by K. Kolich. | 0 |
| 03/31/1992 | Entry scheduling prehearing conference at 10:00 a.m. on 4/7/92 at the Commission offices; scheduling hearing at 1:30 p.m. on 4/7/92 at the Commission offices; that the complainant's March 13, 1992 proposal to amend his original complaint not be authorized; that Thomas Cochran represent himself at the hearing, be represented by his legally appointed guardian, if there is one, or be represented by an attorney at law. (AE) | 0 |
| 03/30/1992 | Motion to dismiss and memorandum in support filed on behalf of respondent, Ohio Edison, by J. Burk. | 0 |
| 03/30/1992 | Memorandum contra complainant's motion to amend complaint filed on behalf of respondent, Ohio Edison, by J. Burk. | 0 |
| 03/23/1992 | Answer to interrogatories filed on behalf of complainant by V. Cochran. | 0 |
| 03/13/1992 | First amended complaint filed on behalf of complainant by T. Cochran and V. Cochran. | 0 |
| 03/02/1992 | Legal notice sent to the Akron Beacon Journal (Summit Cty). | 0 |
| 02/25/1992 | Entry scheduling a prehearing conference on 4/7/92 at 10:00 a.m. and a hearing on 4/7/92 at 1:30 p.m., both at the Commission offices; that notice be published in accordance with Finding 7; that any party intending to present direct expert testimony comply with Rule 4901-1-29- (A)(1)(j), O.A.C.; that Thomas Cochran represent himself at the hearing, be represented by his legally appointed guardian, or be represented by an attorney at law; that respondent's motion to compel be granted except as to question 10 and that Thomas Cochran answer the interroga- tories and return the responses to respondent no later than 20 days from the date respondent again serves the interrogatories upon him. (AE) | 0 |
| 08/16/1991 | Motion to compel and memorandum in support filed on behalf of respondent, Ohio Edison, by J. Burk. | 0 |
| 06/20/1991 | Copy of Power of Attorney from Thomas Cochran To Virgil Cochran, signed copy of complaint, and copy of written contract from Thomas Cochran to Virgil Cochran, filed on behalf of complainant by V. Cochran. | 0 |
| 06/10/1991 | Entry ordering that the complaint as filed in this case is defective; that in order for the Commission to recognize Virgil Cochran's agency, he must file, with the complaint, a power of attorney, guardianship, or similar legal document setting forth his right to bring this complaint in his son's name; unless Virgil Cochran is the legal guardian of Thomas Cochran or an attorney at law, he will not be able to appear on behalf of Thomas Cochran at any hearing; if Thomas Cochran wishes to pursue this matter, he should file a signed copy of his complaint in the docketing division of the Commission within 20 days of the date of this entry; if Virgil Cochran wishes to file this complaint on his son's behalf, then he should file a signed copy of the complaint with the docketing division of the Commission within 20 days of the date of this entry; if neither Thomas Cochran nor Virgil Cochran on behalf of Thomas Cochran comply with the requirements of Findings 3 and 4, within 20 days of this entry, the Attorney Examiner assigned to this case will recommend to the Commission that this case be dismissed with prejudice for lack of prosecution. (AE) | 0 |
| 06/07/1991 | Answer filed on behalf of respondent, Ohio Edison, by J. Burk. | 0 |
| 05/20/1991 | Complaint letter and copy of complaint mailed to: Kathy Kolich, Ohio Edison Company. | 0 |
| 05/16/1991 | In the matter of the complaint of Virgil Cochran, agent for Thomas Cochran (vs) Ohio Edison Company relative to the alleged overcharging for electric services. | 0 |