Skip to main content
      
      
CASE NUMBER: 88-0377-TP-CSS
CASE DESCRIPTION: MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS VS OBT
DOCUMENT SIGNED ON: 12/6/2019
DATE OF SERVICE: ________________________________________
03/06/1990 Entry granting MCI's application for rehearing in part.
02/26/1990 Memorandum contra application for rehearing filed on behalf of respondent by W. Hunt.
02/20/1990 Corrected copy of Commission's Finding and Order dated 1/17/90 in Case Nos. 87-916-TP-ATA and 88-1957-TP-ATA which was attached to Application for Rehearing filed 2/15/90, filed on behalf of complainant by D. Trabaris.
02/15/1990 Application for rehearing filed on behalf of complainant by D. Trabaris.
01/17/1990 Entry granting Ohio Bell's motion to dismiss in part and holding the remainder of the complaint in abeyance pending the outcome of the hearing to be held in Case Nos. 87-916-TP-ATA and 88-1957-TP-ATA.
01/30/1989 MCI's motion for a Commission Order responding to MCI's complaint and request for expedited ruling filed by S. Pestello and M. Alterman.
06/24/1988 Letter filed by Wm. Hunt on behalf of Ohio Bell Telephone Company.
06/16/1988 Respondent's reply to complainant's memorandum contra respondent's motion for protective order filed by Wm. Hunt.
06/07/1988 Complainant's memorandum contra respondent's motion for protective order filed on behalf of MCI Telecommunications Corp. by S. Pestello and A. Johnston.
05/20/1988 Respondents motion for protective order filed by W. Hunt and L. Graft.
05/02/1988 Respondent's reply memorandum in support of its motion to dismiss filed by Wm. Hunt on behalf of The Ohio Bell Telephone Company.
04/22/1988 Memorandum contra Respondent's Motion to Dismiss filed by A. Johnston and S. Pestello on behalf of complainant.
04/04/1988 Respondent's motion to dismiss filed by L. Graft and W. Hunt.
03/15/1988 Copy of complaint form letter and copy of complaint sent out to: Ohio Bell Telephone Company/Office of the President and D. W. Morrison/attorney at law.
03/10/1988 Complaint of MCI Telecommunications Corp. vs Ohio Bell relative to the alleged unjust, unreasonable, unjustly discriminatory, unjustly preferential rates and servies, non-compensatory and in violation of the law; and request for hearing.