DIS - Case Record for 84-0944-TP-COI Skip to main content

Case Record For:

84-0944-TP-COI

File a Public Comment
Case Title: RESALE OF INTRASTATE TELECOMMUNICAT
Status: AR-Archived
Industry Code: TP-TELEPHONE
Purpose Code: COI-Commission inquiry
Date Opened: 8/15/1984
Date Closed: 4/9/1985
Printable Docket Card Service List
View per page
Date FiledSummaryPages
10/19/1994Revised tariff, PUCO No. 7, Price List, 3rd sheet 15, filed on behalf of United Telephone Company of Ohio by J. Ludenia. (2 pgs.)0
04/30/1993Addendum to Price List, PUCO No. 1, filed on behalf of Canton Cellular Telephone Company by C. Edwards.0
04/30/1993Addendum to Price List, PUCO No. 4, filed on behalf of Northern Ohio Cellular Telephone Company by C. Edwards.0
04/30/1993Addendum to Price List, PUCO No. 1, filed on behalf of Akron Cellular Telephone Company by C. Edwards.0
04/30/1993Addendum to Price List, PUCO No. 2, filed on behalf of Northern Ohio Cellular Telephone Company by C. Edwards.0
04/23/1993Addendum to Price List, PUCO No. 2, filed on behalf of Southern Ohio Telephone Company by C. Edwards.0
04/21/1993Addendum to Price List, PUCO No. 1, filed on behalf of the following companies by M. Christensen: 1. Akron Cellular Telephone Company 2. Canton Cellular Telephone Company 3. Northern Ohio Cellular Telephone Company 4. Columbus Cellular Telephone Company 5. Hamilton Cellular Telephone Company 6. Dayton Cellular Telephone Company 7. Springfield Cellular Telephone Company 8. Southern Ohio Telephone Company0
01/28/1993Addendum to Price List, PUCO No. 1, filed on behalf of OCOM Corporation by J. Sanders.0
12/02/1992Revised tariff, PUCO No. 4, Section 6 - 1st sheets 4, 4A, 4B, 4C, 4D, 4E, and 4F (PL), 1st sheets 5, 5A, 5B, 5C, 5D, 5E, and 5F (PL), filed on behalf of GTE North by J. Kennedy.0
11/27/1992Revised tariff, PUCO No. 8, Section 14 - Price List - 2nd sheet 13, filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell by R. Sigmon.0
11/04/1992Addendum to Price List, PUCO No. 1, filed on behalf of OCOM Corp. by J. Sanders.0
10/27/1992Price List, PUCO No. 1, page 5, filed on behalf of OCOM Corp. by J. Sanders.0
09/08/1992Final tariff sheets PUCO Nos. 1 and 2 filed on behalf of the applicant by J. Troup.0
08/31/1992Tariff, PUCO No. 2, Price List - 1st sheet 9, filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell by R. Sigmon.0
08/18/1992Tariff, PUCO No. 8, Section 14 - 1st sheet 13, filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell Telephone by R. Sigmon.0
02/14/1992Revised tariffs, PUCO No. 1, Price List - 4th page 1, 4th page 2, 3rd page 3, 2nd page 4; 3rd sheet 32, filed on behalf of applicant by B. Ferris.0
01/29/1992Revised tariffs, PUCO No. 1, Price List - 3rd page 1, 3rd page 2, 2nd page 3, and 2nd page 4, filed on behalf of Maumee Valley Communications, Inc. dba Shared Use Network (S.U.N.) by B. Ferris.0
01/28/1992Revised tariff, PUCO No. 1, Price List - 2nd page 2, filed on behalf of Maumee Valley Communications, Inc. dba Shared Use Network (S.U.N.) by B. Ferris.0
12/18/1991Price list, PUCO No. 1 filed on behalf of the Maumee valley Communications, Inc. dba Shared Use Network (S.U.N.) by D. Grimm.0
04/25/1991Revised tariffs, PUCO No. 1, Index - 5th sheet 5; Preface - 9th sheet 3; Section 1 - 7th sheet 1, original sheet 1.1, 5th sheet 4.1, 5th sheet 5, original sheet 5.1, 1st sheet 6.1, 9th sheet 7, 14th sheet 8, 3rd sheet 9, original sheet 10, original sheet 11, 1st sheet 8, original sheet 11, filed on behalf of Ohio Bell by A. Krekel.0
05/25/1990Revised tariff sheet PUCO No. 1 filed on behalf of TMC of Columbus filed by M. Hanus.0
09/08/1988Pricing Lists filed by L. H. Soeder on behalf of Ohio Bell Telephone Company.0
06/23/1988Revised addendeum to price list filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell Telephone by P. Brown.0
05/03/1988Tariff sheet, PUCO No. 1, filed by M. Ensurd on behalf of Teleconnect. (PLEASE NOTE: this document was file in Tele- communications on 4/21/88)0
04/14/1988Revisied price list PUCO No. 2 filed on behalf of Western Union by R. Fulton, Jr.0
02/02/1988Price List filed on behalf of Digital Paging Systems of Toledo, Inc.0
09/24/1987Replacement page filed by R. M. Fulton, Jr., on behalf of Western Union.0
06/05/1987Revisied tariff PUCO No. 1 filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell Long Distance, Inc. by J. Plye.0
05/29/1987Addendum to price list tariff PUCO No. 1 filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell Long Distance,Inc. by J. Plye.0
02/13/1987Final tariff sheets filed by D. Hummer on behalf of AT&T Communications.0
10/09/1986Replacement Pricing List for General Exchange Tariff - Sale of Regulated Reciever Numbers, Section 14, Sheet 199 filed by R. E. Sigmon on behalf of Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company.0
08/05/1986Supplemental Finding & Order stating that energy utilities which share channel capacity on their private telecommunica- tions systems under Part 94 of the FCC's rules, whether it be for-profit or not-for-profit, are not subject to this Commission's jurisdiction.0
08/01/1986Newly revised price list for pages 40, 41, 46 and 47 filed by S. Groves on behalf of MCI Telecommunications Corporation0
07/09/1986New pricing list, reducing the message toll service rates on behalf of Cincinnati Bell Long Distance, Inc., filed by S. Robertson.0
07/01/1986Case file returned from the Supreme Couort (SC 85-1210).0
06/19/1986Revised Tariff sheets filed by M. Townsend on behalf of the applicant.0
06/03/1986Revised Tariff price sheets for LightMail Service, filed by M. Townsend on behalf of Litel Telecommunications Corpora- tion.0
06/02/1986Notice of Substitution of Counsel filed by C. Arnebeck, Jr on behalf of MCI Telecommunications Corporation.0
05/13/1986Withdrawal of Counsel of Richard A. Zellner on behalf of MCI Telecommunications Corporation, filed by C. Glazer.0
04/23/1986PUCO Tariff No.1 filed on behalf of Metrotec, Inc. by S. Bloomfield.0
04/23/1986PUCO Tariff No. 1 filed on behalf of Mobilecomm of Ohio, Inc by S. Bloomfield.0
03/11/1986New Tariff filed on behalf of US Telecom by S. Tuttle.0
12/17/1985Rehearing denied0
08/02/1985Supreme court appeal.0
05/09/1985Rehearing filed.0
04/09/1985Opinion and order adopting the regulatory framework established for the various segments of the telecommunications industry; that such framework will remain in effect as long as the Commission finds that competition in the various segments of the telecommunications is fair and effective.14
04/09/1985Order journalized.0
10/09/1984Rehearing denied.0
08/15/1984Case filed.0