DIS - Case Record for 12-2980-EL-CSS Skip to main content
      
      
CASE NUMBER: 12-2980-EL-CSS
CASE DESCRIPTION: EUGENE HOLMES VS CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING COMPANY
DOCUMENT SIGNED ON: 5/8/2024
DATE OF SERVICE: ________________________________________
05/15/2013 Memo closing case with an effective date of 05/15/13.
05/01/2013 Service Notice
05/01/2013 Entry ordered, that, in accordance with the above findings, the complainant's April 9, 2013, rehearing application be denied in its entirety.
04/19/2013 Memorandum Contra Application for Rehearing electronically filed by Lydia M. Floyd on behalf of The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company.
04/09/2013 Application for rehearing and memorandum in support filed by E. Holmes, complainant. (FAX)
03/20/2013 Service Notice
03/20/2013 Entry that in accordance with the above findings, CEl's motion to dismiss this case is granted, and this case is hereby dismissed, based on the complainant's lack of standing to bring the complaint he has filed in this case. It is, further, ordered, that, in accordance with the above findings, the complainant's request to have the Commission, in the event that it finds the complainant lacks standing to bring this complaint himself, proceed further with this case, on its own initiative, is denied.
01/17/2013 Service Notice
01/17/2013 Attorney Examiner Entry scheduling a prehearing settlement teleconference for 10:00 a.m. on 02/06/2013 through the use of the Commission's bridge line in accordance with Finding (4). - electronically filed by Sandra Coffey on behalf of Daniel Fullin, Attorney Examiner, Public Utilities Commission of Ohio
01/14/2013 Reply in Support of the Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company's Motion to Dismiss electronically filed by Lydia M. Floyd on behalf of The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company.
01/07/2013 Response to Respondent's motion to dismiss and notice of objection and memorandum in support filed by E. Holmes, Complainant. (FAX)
01/03/2013 Motion and memorandum in support for extension of time to answer motion to dismiss and respondent answer to complaint filed by complainant, E. Holmes.
01/03/2013 Service Notice
01/02/2013 Attorney Examiner Entry grants an extension until 01/09/2013 for the Complainant to file a Memorandum Contra the Respondent's Motion to Dismiss and until 01/16/2013 for the Respondent to file a Reply Memorandum. The Complainant's request for time and opportunity to file a formal pleading in response to the Respondent's Answer to the Complaint is denied. - electronically filed by Sandra Coffey on behalf of Daniel Fullin, Attorney Examiner, Public Utilities Commission of Ohio.
12/31/2012 Motion and memorandum in support for an extension of time filed by complainant, Eugene Holmes. (FAX)
12/17/2012 Motion to Dismiss and Memorandum in Support electronically filed by Lydia M. Floyd on behalf of The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company.
12/17/2012 Answer of Respondent The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company to Complaint electronically filed by Lydia M. Floyd on behalf of The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company.
12/03/2012 Notice of Objection and Reply in Opposition to Respondent's, Motion for Extension of Time to File Responsive Pleading Filed by Eugene P. Holmes. (original)
12/03/2012 Service Notice
12/03/2012 Attorney Examiner Entry granting an extension of time to answer. - electronically filed by Sandra Coffey on behalf of Daniel Fullin, Attorney Examiner, Public Utilities Commission of Ohio
11/30/2012 Notice of objection and reply in opposition to respondent's motion for extension of time to file responsive pleading filed by E. Holmes, complainant. (FAX)
11/28/2012 Motion and memorandum in support for Extension of Time to File Responsive Pleading electronically filed by Lydia M. Floyd on behalf of The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company.
11/15/2012 Complaint Response Letter and copy of brochure sent to Mr. Eugene Holmes.
11/15/2012 Complaint Service Letter and copy of complaint sent to Ms. Leila Vespoli, Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company.
11/14/2012 In the matter of the complaint of Eugene Holmes vs The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company for the alleged abuse of discreation as well as public safety.