Skip to main content
      
      
CASE NUMBER: 12-0919-EL-CSS
CASE DESCRIPTION: MATERIAL SCIENCES CORPORATION VS THE TOLEDO EDISON COMPANY
DOCUMENT SIGNED ON: 8/9/2020
DATE OF SERVICE: ________________________________________
04/20/2018 Case action form closing case(s) effective 04/20/2018 - electronically filed by Sandra Coffey on behalf of Megan Addison, Attorney Examiner, Public Utilities Commission of Ohio.
01/29/2014 Service Notice
01/29/2014 Entry ordered, that the request to dismiss the complaint, with prejudice, is granted and the case be dismissed.
01/06/2014 Request of Dismissal of Complaint with prejudice by Material Sciences Corporation electronically filed by Mr. Craig I Smith on behalf of Material Sciences Corporation.
10/25/2013 Service Notice
10/25/2013 Attorney Examiner Entry scheduling a status conference via telephone for 01/24/2014 at 1:00 p.m. in the event no request to dismiss has been filed as of that date. - electronically filed by Sandra Coffey on behalf of Mandy Willey Chiles, Attorney Examiner, Public Utilities Commission of Ohio
12/05/2012 Correspondence with change of address for Whitt Sturtevant, LLP filed by M. Whitt.
08/20/2012 Notification of Withdrawal of Melissa Thompson for the above-referenced cases filed by Andrew J. Campbell.
04/13/2012 Motion and memorandum in support to Continue and Hold in Abeyance electronically filed by Ms. Melissa L. Thompson on behalf of The Toledo Edison Company.
04/03/2012 Service Notice
04/03/2012 Entry ordering TE's motion for extension of the time to file an answer from April 2, 2012 until April 13, 2012, be granted.(MLW)
04/02/2012 Motion and memorandum in support to extend the time to file an answer electronically filed by Ms. Melissa L. Thompson on behalf of The Toledo Edison Company.
03/12/2012 Complaint response letter and copy of brochure mailed to: Craig I. Smith, complainant
03/12/2012 Complaint service letter and copy of complaint mailed to Ms. Vespoli, Toledo Edison Company.
03/12/2012 In the matter of the complaint of Material Sciences Corporation vs The Toledo Edison Company for violating statutory and regulatory duties related to retail electric services provided to the MSC Walbridge Facilities, and states as follows in support of its request for relief: Elk Grove Village, Illinois, Walbridge, Ohio, Eisenach, Germany, and in joint manufacturing ventures in Malaysia, South America, and Korea.