DIS - Case Record for 11-5427-EL-CSS Skip to main content

Case Record For:

11-5427-EL-CSS

File a Public Comment
Case Title: MARCENA UPP VS TOLEDO EDISON COMPANY
Status: AR-Archived
Industry Code: EL-ELECTRIC
Purpose Code: CSS-Complaint on service or safety
Date Opened: 10/11/2011
Date Closed:
Printable Docket Card Service List
View per page
Date FiledSummaryPages
05/20/2014Case action form archiving case with an effective date of 5/20/2014.1
08/08/2013Case status form to close case.1
03/27/2013Service Notice2
03/27/2013Entry ordered, that, in accordance with Finding (6), the joint motion to dismiss the complaint with prejudice be granted.2
02/27/2013Joint motion to dismiss filed by Marcena Upp, complainant, and A. Headt on behalf of The Toledo Edison Company, Respondent.3
12/21/2012The Toledo Edison Company's Memorandum Contra motion to stay disconnection and to refrain for estimated meter reading filed by Allison E. Haedt on behalf of The Toledo Edison Company. 14
12/17/2012The Toledo Edison Company 's reply in support of Motion to Dismiss for failure to prosecute filed by Allison E. Haedt. 6
12/11/2012Motion for continuance to file supplemental responses to Respondent's interrogatories #10, #17 and #19 motion in response to respondent's motion to dismiss for failure to prosecute filed by M. Upp, Complainant.6
12/11/2012Motion for enforcement of the Commission's Order that respondent stay disconnection during formal hearing process motion to compel respondent to refrain from an estimated reading when the utility claims to have the practice of use of remote readings filed by complainant, M. Upp.9
11/28/2012Motion to dismiss for failure to prosecute and memorandum in support filed by A. Haedt on behalf of The Toledo Edison.8
11/01/2012Service Notice2
11/01/2012Attorney Examiner Entry granting in part and denying in part Toledo Edison's motion to compel; electronically filed by Debra Hight on behalf of L. Douglas Jennings, Attorney Examiner, Public Utilities Commission of Ohio.6
09/06/2012Motion to compel complete responses to The Toledo Edison Company's written discovery requests and memorandum in support filed by A. Headt.48
07/26/2012Service Notice1
07/26/2012Attorney Examiner Entry granting Toledo Edison's motion to continue hearing electronically filed by Vesta R Miller on behalf of L. Douglas Jennings, Attorney Examiner, Public Utilities Commission of Ohio.4
07/25/2012Notice of Postponement of Deposition of Marcena Upp on behalf of Toledo Edison Company, filed by A. Haedt. 3
07/23/2012Motion for continuance of hearing filed by A.E. Haedt on behalf of The Toledo Edison Company, Respondent. 4
07/12/2012Notice of Deposition of Marcena UPP taken by The Toledo Edison Company at the Collins Reporting Services Inc. filed by Allison E. Haedt.3
07/12/2012Response of Ohio Edison to Motion for stay of disconnection during formal hearing process filed by Allison E. Haedt.4
07/10/2012Motion for stay of disconnection during formal hearing process filed by M.M.Upp, Complainant. 15
06/28/2012Service Notice1
06/28/2012Entry ordering a hearing be scheduled on August 8, 2012, at 10:00 a.m., at the offices of the Commission, 11th floor, hearing room 11-D, 180 East Broad Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215. (LDJ)2
02/01/2012Service Notice1
01/31/2012Entry ordering to reschedule the settlement conference for February 8, 2012, at 10:00 a.m. in Room 1246 in the offices of the Commission, 12th Floor, 180 E. Broad Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215. (LDJ)2
01/04/2012Service Notice1
01/04/2012Entry ordered that in accordance with Finding (5), the complaintant's motion to extend time is granted; that Toledo Edison's motion to dismiss the complainant's FDCPA claim for failure to state reasonable ground be granted; that in accordance with Finding (9), a settlement conference be held on January 26, 2012.5
12/09/2011Reply in support of the Toledo Edison Company's motion to dismiss complainant's Fair Debt Collection Practices Act claim filed by A. Haedt.4
12/08/2011Motion for Extension of time to file Motion in response to Motion to Dismiss filed by Marcena Upp.1
12/08/2011Motion in Opposition to The Toledo Edison's Motion to dismiss the Complaint alleging it is a Fair Debt Collection Practices Act issue filed by Marcena Upp.2
11/14/2011The Toledo Edison Company's Motion to dismiss complainant's fair debt collection practices act claim and memorandum in support of the Toledo Edison Company's motion to dismiss complainant's fair debt collection practices act claim filed by Allison E. Haedt. 6
11/14/2011Answer of The Toledo Edison Company filed by Allison E. Haedt.15
11/02/2011Service Notice1
11/02/2011Entry ordered; that Ohio Edison's motion to extend time shall be granted and that Ohio Edison shall file pleadings in response to the complaint on or before November 14, 2011. (LDJ)2
10/25/2011Motion for extension of time to file responsive pleading and memorandum in support filed by A.E.Haedt on behalf of respondent The Toledo Edison Company, 5
10/12/2011Complaint response letter and copy of brochure mailed to: Marcena Upp complainant. 1
10/12/2011Complaint service letter and copy of complaint mailed to: Ms. Leila Vespoli, Toledo Edison Company. 1
10/11/2011In the matter of the complaint of Marcena Upp vs Toledo Edison FirstEnergy for the alleged unfair and unjust billing practices. 143