DIS - Case Record for 10-1010-TP-ORD Skip to main content

Case Record For:

10-1010-TP-ORD

File a Public Comment
Case Title: IN THE MATTER OF THE ADOPTION OF RULES TO IMPLEMENT SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL 162
Status: CL-CLOSED
Industry Code: TP-TELEPHONE
Purpose Code: ORD-Administrative order
Date Opened: 7/28/2010
Date Closed: 9/25/2012
Printable Docket Card Service List
View per page
Date FiledSummaryPages
09/25/2012Case Action Form to Close cases effective 09/25/2012 filed by J. Jones.1
07/11/2012In the matter of the Detariffing Application of Yestel USA, Inc. to detariff services and make other related changes electronically filed by Ms. Becky Heggelund.38
11/07/2011Revised tariff pages PUCO tariff No.1 for the Detariffing Application on behalf of Advanced Integrated Technologies, Inc. electronically filed by Ms. Becky Heggelund on behalf of Advanced Integrated Technologies, Inc..45
10/20/2011Correspondence Revisions to Detariffing Application on behalf of Community ISP, Inc. electronically filed by Ms. Becky Heggelund on behalf of Community ISP, Inc.12
10/18/2011Revisions to the Detariffing Application on behalf of Consolidated Telecom, Inc. electronically filed by Ms. Becky Heggelund on behalf of Consolidated Telecom, Inc.3
10/18/2011In the matter of the application for Detariffing Application and Telecommunications Retail Service Offering Form for Non-BLES Carriers for Southwest Communications, Inc. electronically filed by Ms. Becky Heggelund on behalf of Southwest Communications, Inc.34
09/29/2011Answer Response to the Commissions Order dated August 17, 2011 electronically filed by Ms. Elizabeth Manzoni on behalf of Manzoni, Elizabeth Ms.2
09/19/2011In the matter of the application for Detariffing and Telecommunications Retail Service Offering Form for Non-BLES Carriers on behalf of Consolidated Telecom, Inc. electronically filed by Ms. Becky Heggelund on behalf of Consolidated Telecom, Inc.34
09/12/2011Correspondence of Detariffing Requirements electronically filed by Ms. Maria A. Abbagnaro on behalf of Cordia Communications Corp. and Northstar Telecom Inc.2
09/06/2011Letter that Network Operator Services, Inc. does not provide residential communications service in Ohio filed by D. Harness.1
08/26/2011Return Mail.3
08/23/2011Letter submitted in response to the Commission order issued August 17, 2011 citing a number of companies for failure to file detariffing applications filed on behalf of Global Tel*Link Corporation by R. Norton.1
08/22/2011Return Mail3
08/22/2011RETURN MAIL. 3
08/22/2011Response to Order issued August 17, 2011 regarding failure to file detariffing application. electronically filed by Laura McGrath on behalf of Conversant Technologies, Inc.2
08/22/2011Response to Order issued August 17, 2011 regarding failure to file detariffing application. electronically filed by Laura McGrath on behalf of Combined Public Communications, Inc.2
08/22/2011Response to Order issued August 17, 2011 regarding failure to file detariffing application. electronically filed by Laura McGrath on behalf of Inmate Calling Solutions, LLC d/b/a ICSolutions.2
08/22/2011Response to Order issued August 17, 2011 regarding failure to file detariffing application. electronically filed by Laura McGrath on behalf of Global Tel*Link Corporation.2
08/22/2011Response to Order issued August 17, 2011 regarding failure to file detariffing application. electronically filed by Laura McGrath on behalf of Public Communications Services, Inc.2
08/22/2011Response to Order issued August 17, 2011 regarding failure to file detariffing application. electronically filed by Laura McGrath on behalf of Value-Added Communications, Inc.2
08/22/2011Response to Order issued August 17, 2011 regarding failure to file detariffing application. electronically filed by Laura McGrath on behalf of Pay Tel Communications, Inc.2
08/17/2011Service notice.31
08/17/2011Entry ordering that consistent with the findings above, each telephone company set forth on the appendix to this Entry shall file their detariffing applications with the Commission, no later than September 16, 2011.13
07/19/2011Affidavit Revised Customer Notice and Updated Affidavit of Ernest Communications, Inc. electronically filed by Mrs. Grace D Stanley on behalf of Ernest Communications, Inc. and Masters, Paul Mr.4
06/29/2011Revised tariff page for PUCO Tariff #4 Page 20 electronically filed by Ms. Nancy L Myers on behalf of Impact Network Solutions Inc.3
06/29/2011Revisions for tariff PUCO #4 Pages 19 - 21 electronically filed by Ms. Nancy L Myers on behalf of Impact Network Solutions Inc.6
05/18/2011In the Matter of the Application of SuperNet, Inc. to Detariff Services and Make Other Changes Related to the Implementation of Case No. 10-1010-TP-ORD electronically filed by Mrs. Terri K Firestein on behalf of SuperNet, Inc.48
05/17/2011In the matter of the Application for detariffing services in Section 4, Consumer Local Exchange Service-Facility Based and detariffing in it's entirety, Section 5 - Small Business Service electronically filed by Ms. Griselda Antu on behalf of VERIZON.2
04/29/2011Text Telecommunications Retail Service Offering Form (Non-BLES Carrier) electronically filed by Ms. LOURDES VINAS on behalf of TRANSWORLD NETWORK, CORP.3
04/18/2011Tariff DETARIFF Teleconnect Long Distance Services and Systems Company P.U.C.O. No. 4 Case No. 10-1010-TP-ORD electronically filed by Ms. Griselda Antu on behalf of VERIZON2
04/18/2011Tariff TTI National, Inc. P.U.C.O. No. 2 Case No. 10-1010-TP-ORD electronically filed by Ms. Griselda Antu on behalf of VERIZON2
04/18/2011Tariff Detariffing MCI Communications Services: Tariff No. 3 Case No. 10-1010-TP-ORD electronically filed by Ms. Griselda Antu on behalf of VERIZON and Ms. Griselda Antu2
04/18/2011In the matter of the application Cincinnati Bell Any Distance Inc. is filing to withdraw its Local Exchange and Interexchange Services Tariff. electronically filed by Kathleen M Campbell on behalf of CINCINNATI BELL ANY DISTANCE INC.91
04/07/2011Service Notice21
04/07/2011Entry ordering that all telephone companies that have not yet filed their detariffing applications must do so in accordance with Finding (2). JRJ2
03/16/2011Service notice.6
03/16/2011Third entry on rehearing ordering OPTC's application for rehearing filed on February 18, 2011, be denied.5
02/28/2011Memorandum contra application for rehearing of members of Ohioans protecting telephone consumers filed by C. Flahive on behalf of Ohio Telecom Association. 7
02/28/2011Memorandum contra the OPTC's application for rehearing electronically filed by Jon F Kelly on behalf of The AT&T Entities10
02/18/2011Application for rehearing and memorandum in support by Members of Ohioans Protecting Telephone Consumers, filed by D. Bergman on behalf of the OCC, N. Morgan on behalf of Communities United for Action, E. Jacobs on behalf of Edgemont Neighborhood Coalition, M. Smalz and M. Walters on behalf of Pro Seniors, Inc.25
01/19/2011Service notice.46
01/19/2011Entry ordering all telephone companies utilize the telecommunications filing form in accordance with Finding (2); all telephone companies shall file the applicable implementation ATA in accordance with Finding (3); in conjunction with the provision of customer notice, all telephone companies must file the requisite affidavit in accordance with Findings (3) and (4).26
12/15/2010Service Notice5
12/15/2010Second entry on rehearing ordering the application filed on November 26, 2010, be denied.12
12/06/2010Memorandum contra application for rehearing by Members of Ohioans Protecting Telephone Consumers filed by D. Bergmann on behalf of OCC, by J. Meissner on behalf of Legal Aid Society of Greater Cleveland, by Ellis Jacobs on behalf of Edgemont Neighborhood, N. Morgan on behalf of Legal Aid Society of Southwest Ohio LLC., by M. Smalz on behalf of Ohio Poverty Law Center, by M. Walters on behalf of Pro Seniors, Inc.10
12/06/2010Memorandum contra the Ohioans Protecting Telephone Consumers' application for rehearing electronically filed by Jon F Kelly on behalf of The AT&T Entities.12
12/06/2010Memorandum contra application for rehearing of members of Ohioans Protecting Telephone Consumers filed by C. Flahive on behalf of Ohio Telecom Association9
11/26/2010Application for rehearing and memorandum in support by members of Ohioans Protecting Telephone Consumers, filed by T. Etter on behalf of the OCC, J. Meissner on behalf of Citizens Coalition, E. Jacobs on behalf of Edgemont Neighborhood Coalition, M. Smalz on behalf of Ohio Poverty Law Center, M Walters on behalf of Pro Seniors, Inc. 37
11/26/2010Application for rehearing and memorandum in support on behalf of The Ohio Telecom Association for Rehearing by C. Flahive. 9
11/26/2010Application for rehearing and memorandum in support electronically filed by Jon F Kelly on behalf of The AT&T Entities.20
11/10/2010Service Notice1
11/10/2010Entry on rehearing stating that the September 15, 2010, entry be clarified and modified with finding 4 and 6.3
10/27/2010Opinion and order denying OPTC's motion for oral argument; that Chapters 4901:1-4, O.A.C., 4901:1-5, O.A.C., and 4901:1-6 O.A.C. be rescinded in their entirety and new rules be enacted as set forth in Appendix A to this opinion and order; that to the extent not addressed in this opinion and order or attached Appendix A, all other arguments are denied.110
10/27/2010Service Notice46
10/25/2010Response to the OCC's application for rehearing, filed by C. Flahive on behalf of Frontier North Inc.6
10/25/2010Memorandum contra the Ohio Consumers Counsel's application for rehearing electronically filed by Jon F Kelly on behalf of AT&T Ohio.4
10/19/2010Memorandum contra motion for oral argument by members of Ohioans Protecting Telephone Consumers electronically filed by Carolyn S Flahive on behalf of Ohio Telecom Association.6
10/19/2010Memorandum contra OCC motion electronically filed by Ms. Mary K. Fenlon on behalf of AT&T Ohio.9
10/19/2010Response of Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company LLC to OPTC motion for oral argument and request for expedited ruling electronically filed by Mr. Robert W Wilhelm on behalf of Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company LLC.3
10/15/2010Application for rehearing and memorandum in support filed by T. Etter on behalf of OCC.10
10/12/2010Motion for oral argument and request for expedited ruling by members of Ohioans Protecting Telephone Consumers and memorandum in support electronically filed by Mrs. Mary V. Edwards on behalf of Bergmann, David C. and Office of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel.11
09/30/2010Reply Comments electronically filed by Jon F Kelly on behalf of The AT&T Entities.32
09/30/2010Reply Comments of the Ohio Cable Telecommunications Association electronically filed by Mr. Stephen M. Howard.14
09/30/2010Reply Comments by members of Ohioans Protecting Telephone Consumers electronically filed by Mrs. Mary V. Edwards on behalf of Etter, Terry L. and Office of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel.59
09/30/2010Reply Comments of Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company LLC electronically filed by Mr. Robert W. Wilhelm on behalf of Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company LLC.12
09/30/2010Reply Comments electronically filed by Teresa Orahood on behalf of tw telecom of ohio llc.5
09/30/2010Reply Comments of the Ohio Telecom Association electronically filed by Carolyn S Flahive on behalf of Ohio Telecom Association.12
09/30/2010Reply comments of Verizon electronically filed by Carolyn S Flahive on behalf of Verizon.8
09/15/2010Service Notice8
09/15/2010Entry ordering that all ILECs comply with findings 3 and 4.5
08/30/2010Initial Comments of the Ohio Cable Telecommunications Association electronically filed by S. Howard on behalf of Ohio Cable Telecommunications Association.15
08/30/2010Comments of the Ohio Telecom Association electronically filed by C. Flahive on behalf of Ohio Telecom Association.49
08/30/2010Comments electronically filed by J. Kelly on behalf of The AT&T Entities.27
08/30/2010Comments by Members of Ohioans Protecting Telephone Consumers electronically filed by M. Edwards on behalf of OCC.88
08/30/2010Comments of tw telecom of ohio llc electronically filed by T. Orahood.6
08/30/2010Initial Comments of Verizon electronically filed by Carolyn S Flahive on behalf of Verizon.7
08/30/2010Comments of Cincinnati Bell electronically filed by Kathleen M Campbell on behalf of Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company.13
07/30/2010Service Notice48
07/29/2010Entry ordered that any interested person or entity wishing to file comments or reply comments with the Commission regarding the proposed rule do so by August 30, 2010, or September 30, 2010, respectively. 41
07/28/2010In the matter of the adoption of rules to implement substitute Senate Bill 162. 1