Case Record For:	10-0503-EL-FOR	File a Public Comment
Case Title:	DUKE ENERGY OF OHIO CORPORATION
Status:	OPEN-OPEN
Industry Code:	EL-ELECTRIC
Purpose Code:	FOR-Forecasting
Date Opened:	3/25/2010
Date Closed:

• Case Documents
• Public Comments
• Parties of Record
• Related Cases

View per page

Date Filed Summary Pages 07/28/2011 Letter expressing concern over Duke's lack of efficiency responsibilities and the proposal of the building a new nuclear plant filed by D. Glenboski. 1 07/20/2011 Letter in opposition to the proposed Duke nuclear power facility filed by consumer, R. Brokaw. 1 07/19/2011 Letter expressing concern over Duke Energy proposing to build an expensive nuclear power facility filed by Miss R. Safron. 1 07/11/2011 Public comment concerning Duke Energy's application to build new nuclear plant filed on behalf of concerned consumer, Kurt Frees. 1 06/20/2011 Public comment filed by concerned consumer Mrs. Christine Selick in reference to SB221. 1 06/15/2011 Public Comment filed by concerned consumer: Ms. Jacki Masar. 1 06/13/2011 Public comment concerning energy efficiency requirements of Duke Energy Ohio filed on behalf of concerned consumer, Mr. Joe Rosemeyer. 1 06/13/2011 Public comment concerning energy efficiency requirements of Duke Energy Ohio filed on behalf of concerned consumer, Dr. George & Betsy Vozary. 1 06/13/2011 Public comment concerning energy efficiency requirements of Duke Energy Ohio filed on behalf of concerned consumer, Fred Oswald. 1 06/10/2011 Public Comment stating concern on dirty expensive fossil fuels filed on behalf of concerned consumer, B. Bunch. 1 06/10/2011 Public Comment stating concern on dirty expensive fossil fuels filed on behalf of concerned consumer, Ms. Leone Batte. 1 06/09/2011 Public Comment filed by concerned consumer Ms. Cheryl Luce in reference to SB221. 1 06/09/2011 Public Comment filed by concerned consumer Mr. John Dierig in reference to SB221. 1 05/23/2011 Correspondence in reference to Duke nuclear plant proposal filed by concerned consumer, Josh Blew. 1 05/10/2011 Public comment concerning energy efficiency requirements of Duke Energy Ohio filed on behalf of concerned consumer, Thomas Barnet. 1 04/25/2011 Public Comment concerning Duke's Energy efficiency requirements filed by consumer C. Renner. 1 04/12/2011 Letter stating concern on dirty expensive fossil fuels filed on behalf of concerned consumer, K. Stovarsky. 1 03/29/2011 Letter opposing nuclear power facility for failing to provide proper estimate of low cost energy efficiency in Ohio filed by concerned consumer, V. Hooffstetter. 1 03/15/2011 Letter from consumer, M. Lauer strongly urging enforcement of SB221. 1 02/15/2011 Letter in opposition to the proposed Duke Energy nuclear plant filed by G. Uccello, consumer. 1 02/11/2011 Letters urging enforcement of SB221 filed by various consumers. 5 01/31/2011 Letter in opposition to the proposed Duke Energy nuclear plant filed by G. Burton, the Sierra Club. 1 01/10/2011 Letter asking the Commission to hold Duke accountable and to go beyond its efficiency requirements filed by L. Bildstein. 1 11/08/2010 Letter concerning renewable energy use filed on behalf of concerned consumer, R. Corpuz. 1 11/03/2010 Correspondence letter asking Duke not to build a Nuclear Facility, filed by S. Carey, consumer. 1 11/03/2010 Correspondence opposing Duke Energy Nuclear Facility, filed by H. Carey, consumer. 1 11/02/2010 Correspondence letters urging strong enforcement of SB221 filed by, R. Corpuz, consumer. 1 10/05/2010 Correspondence letter opposing Duke Energy building a nuclear plant in Ohio, filed by S. Booth, consumer. 1 10/05/2010 Correspondence opposing Duke's nuclear plant, filed by various consumers. 2 10/04/2010 Correspondence letter opposing Duke Energy building a nuclear plaint in Ohio, filed by M. Maxwell, consumer. 1 10/01/2010 Correspondence letters urging strong enforcement of SB221 filed by various consumers. 17