DIS - Case Record for 10-0155-EL-RDR Skip to main content

Case Record For:

10-0155-EL-RDR

File a Public Comment
Case Title: COLUMBUS SOUTHERN POWER COMPANY AND OHIO POWER COMPANY
Status: CL-CLOSED
Industry Code: EL-ELECTRIC
Purpose Code: RDR-Application to establish tariff riders that do not have another specific code.
Date Opened: 2/8/2010
Date Closed: 10/3/2013
Printable Docket Card Service List
View per page
Date FiledSummaryPages
10/03/2013Case Action Form closing case effective 10/3/2013.1
11/16/2010Notice of withdrawal of counsel, Joseph M. Clark in these proceedings filed by McNees Wallace & Nurick LLC by J. Oliker.6
10/22/2010Service Notice2
10/22/2010Entry on rehearing denying OCC's application for rehearing; Concurring opinion of Commissioner Cheryl L. Roberto.9
10/06/2010Notice of withdrawal of counsel, L. McAlister, filed on behalf of McNees Wallace & Nurick LLC by J. Clark. 5
10/05/2010Columbus Southern Power Company's and Ohio Power Company's amended memorandum in opposition to the OCC's application for rehearing, filed by S. Nourse on behalf of American Electric Power. 8
10/04/2010Columbus Southern Power Company's and Ohio Power Company's memorandum in opposition to the OCC's application for rehearing, filed by M. Satterwhite on behalf of Columbus Southern Power Company and Ohio Power Company.15
09/24/2010Application for rehearing filed on behalf of the Office of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel by T. Etter.16
08/27/2010Compliance tariffs of Columbus Southern Power Company and Ohio Power Company filed by S. Nourse.51
08/25/2010Service Notice2
08/25/2010Finding and Order ordering that AEP-Ohio's motion to file additional reply comments be granted; that AEP-Ohio is directed to revise the EICCR rates and file tariffs consistent with this finding and order. Concurring opinion of Commissioner Cheryl L. Roberto.12
08/13/2010Additional reply comments in response to the Ohio Consumers Counsel filed by S Nourse on behalf of Columbus Southern Power and Ohio Power Company. 4
08/09/2010Comments on AEP's letter of July 21, 2010 by The Office of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel by T. Etter.5
08/09/2010Correspondence stating that AEP Ohio agrees with the observations and edits reflected in Staff's July 30, 2010 letter filed by S. Nourse.1
07/30/2010Letter stating Staff has no issues remaining that require a formal adjudicatory hearing but reserves the right to file a brief after comments are filed, filed by T. McNamee.2
07/21/2010Environmental Investment Carrying Cost Riders filed by Columbus Southern Power Company and Ohio Power Company filed by S. Nourse. 38
06/01/2010Memorandum contra AEP's motion to file additional reply comments by The Office of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel filed by T. Etter. 4
05/14/2010Columbus Southern Power Company's and Ohio Power Company's motion and memorandum in support to file additional response to OCC's reply comments and additional reply comments filed by M. Resnik.6
05/10/2010Columbus Southern Power Company's and Ohio Power Company's reply to comments filed by Industrial Energy Users-Ohio and Ohio Consumers' Counsel and to the comments and recommendations of the Commission's Staff filed by M. Resnik.12
05/10/2010Reply comments of Industrial Energy Users-Ohio filed by J. Clark.7
05/10/2010Reply comments by the Office of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel filed by T. Etter.17
04/30/2010Comments and recommendations filed by Staff on behalf of the Staff of the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio.19
04/30/2010Comments of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel filed by T. Etter.14
04/08/2010Entry ordering that the motions for intervention filed by OCC, IEU-Ohio, and OPAE be granted as discussed in finding (7); OPAE's motion pro hac vice filed in the gridSMART case should be granted as discussed in finding (8); comments be filed with the Commission by April 30, 2010, and reply comments by May 10, 2010. (GS)7
04/08/2010Service Notice2
03/26/2010Motion to intervene and memorandum in support and comments, filed by J. Clark on behalf of Industrial Energy Users-Ohio. 17
03/15/2010Reply to AEP's memorandum contra OCC's motion for a procedural ruling filed on behalf of the Office of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel by T. Etter.6
03/03/2010Memorandum contra Ohio Consumers' Counsel's motion for a procedural ruling filed on behalf of Columbus Southern Power Company by M. Resnik.4
02/23/2010Motion to intervene, motion for a procedural ruling, and memorandum in support filed by T. Etter on behalf of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel.9
02/08/2010In the matter of the application of Columbus Southern Power Company and Ohio Power Company to establish Environmental Investment Carrying Cost Riders.16