| Date Filed | Summary | Pages |
| 04/08/2013 | Memo archiving case with an effective date of 04/08/13. | 1 |
| 02/22/2012 | Case Status form closing case as of 2/22/12. | 1 |
| 02/22/2012 | Supreme Court Document Ohio Supreme Court order unanimously affirming the Commission's decision (cite as In re Complaint of Wilkes v. Ohio Edison Co., Slip Opinion No. 2012-Ohio-609). electronically filed by Kimberly L Keeton on behalf of Public Utilities Commission of Ohio. | 6 |
| 06/01/2011 | Service Notice | 2 |
| 06/01/2011 | Supreme Court 11-737 transmittal papers. | 5 |
| 05/02/2011 | Supreme Court Notice of Appeal filed on behalf of Thomas and Derrell Wilkes by B. Mancino. | 2 |
| 04/05/2011 | Service notice. | 2 |
| 04/05/2011 | Entry ordering the application for rehearing is denied. | 6 |
| 03/18/2011 | Memorandum of Ohio Edison Company contra application for rehearing by Thomas & Derrell Wilkes filed by G. Garber. | 9 |
| 03/08/2011 | Application for rehearing filed by B. Mancino on behalf of complainants, Thomas and Derrell Wilkes. | 7 |
| 02/23/2011 | Service Notice | 2 |
| 02/23/2011 | Entry ordering that, in accordance with Finding (20), Ohio Edison's motion to dismiss the complaint be granted. | 12 |
| 02/16/2011 | Memorandum of Ohio Edison Company contra motion to order Ohio Edison to move 69 kV lines to comport with national electrical safety code by Thomas & Derrell Wilkes, filed by D. Kutik. | 42 |
| 02/07/2011 | Motion to move Ohio Edison 69 kV lines to comport with national electrical safety code filed by B. Mancino on behalf of T & D Wilkes. | 4 |
| 12/30/2010 | Notice of appearance of counsel and substitution of counsel of record, filed by G. Garber on behalf of Ohio Edison Company. | 3 |
| 12/15/2010 | Service Notice | 1 |
| 12/15/2010 | Entry denying Ohio Edison's motion to cancel the prehearing conference; that the conference scheduled for December 15, 2010 shall be conducted by telephone in accordance with Finding (5). | 4 |
| 12/09/2010 | Reply brief of Ohio Edison Company in support of motion to dismiss complaint and to cancel attorney examiner conference filed by A. Juterbock on behalf of Ohio Edison Company. | 4 |
| 12/02/2010 | Thomas & Derrell Wilkes' opposition to Ohio Edison's motion to dismiss and motion to cancel attorney examiner conference filed by B. Mancino. | 14 |
| 11/23/2010 | Ohio Edison Company's supplemental memorandum in support pending motion to dismiss and motion to cancel attorney examiner conference filed by A. Juterbock. | 15 |
| 11/09/2010 | Service Notice | 1 |
| 11/08/2010 | Entry ordered that a prehearing settlement conference shall be scheduled for December 15, 2010, at 1:30 p.m. in room 1246 in the offices of the Commission, 12th floor, 180 East broad Street Columbus, Ohio 43215. (LDJ) | 3 |
| 09/01/2010 | Ohio Edison Company's notice of supplemental authority and supplemental memorandum in support of motion to dismiss filed by A. Juterbock. | 7 |
| 08/30/2010 | Motion to Dismiss filed by B. Mancino on behalf of Ohio Edison Company. | 3 |
| 12/16/2009 | Service Notice. | 1 |
| 12/16/2009 | Entry ordering that Ohio Edison's motion to stay discovery proceedings is granted. (LDJ) | 2 |
| 09/24/2009 | Motion of Ohio Edison to stay discovery proceedings filed by A. Juterbock. | 3 |
| 09/11/2009 | Reply brief of Ohio Edison Company in support of motion to dismiss complaint filed by A. Juterbock on behalf of the Ohio Edison Company. | 18 |
| 09/03/2009 | Opposition to Ohio Edison's motion to dismiss of Thomas and Derrell Wilkes, Complainants, filed by B. Mancino. | 22 |
| 08/25/2009 | Motion to dismiss and memorandum in support of Ohio Edison Company filed by A. Juterbock. | 41 |
| 08/25/2009 | Answer of Ohio Edison Company filed by A. Juterbock. | 26 |
| 08/05/2009 | Complaint response letter and copy of brochure mailed to: Brett Mancino, attorney for complainant. | 1 |
| 08/05/2009 | Complaint service letter and copy of complaint mailed to: Leila Vespoli, Ohio Edison. | 1 |
| 08/05/2009 | In the matter of the complaint of Thomas and Derrell Wilkes vs Ohio Edison for the alleged noncompliance with the National Electrical Safety Code of the 69kV electrical lines. | 6 |