DIS - Case Record for 08-0912-TP-BLS Skip to main content

Case Record For:

08-0912-TP-BLS

File a Public Comment
Case Title: AT&T OHIO
Status: CL-CLOSED
Industry Code: TP-TELEPHONE
Purpose Code: BLS-Basic Local Exchange Service
Date Opened: 7/25/2008
Date Closed: 11/9/2015
Printable Docket Card Service List
View per page
Date FiledSummaryPages
11/09/2015Memo closing cases with an effective date of 11/09/15.2
10/30/2012Service Notice3
10/30/2012Attorney Examiner Entry extending a second time the protective order of August 12, 2008 electronically filed by Vesta R. Miller on behalf of Jay S. Agranoff, Attorney Examiner, Public Utilities Commission of Ohio.4
07/22/2011 Notice of Withdrawal by the Office of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel electronically filed by Ms. Deb J. Bingham on behalf of Etter, Terry L.3
06/20/2011Correspondence in support of motion to extend protective order electronically filed by Carolyn S. Flahive on behalf of Verizon Wireless.2
06/20/2011Correspondence in support of motion to extend protective order electronically filed by Carolyn S. Flahive on behalf of Verizon Business Services.2
06/17/2011Motion for extension and memorandum in support of protective order and memorandum in support electronically filed by Jon F Kelly on behalf of AT&T Ohio.10
02/11/2010Service Notice3
02/11/2010Entry extending the protective order of August 12, 2008 in accordance with Finding (4). (JSA)3
12/15/2009Correspondence letter of Cellco Partnership dba Verizon Wireless supports the Motion for Extension of Protective Order sought by AT&T Ohio on December 11, 2009 electronically filed by Mr. Thomas E Lodge on behalf of Verizon Wireless.2
12/15/2009Correspondence letter from Verizon Business Services (formerly MCI/WorldCom) supporting the Motion for Extension of Protective Order sought by AT&T Ohio on December 11, 2009, electronically filed by Mr. Thomas E Lodge on behalf of Verizon Business Services.2
12/14/2009Correspondence in Support of AT&T Ohio's Motion for Extension of Protective Orders electronically filed by Teresa Orahood on behalf of Sage Telecom, Inc.2
12/11/2009Motion for extension of protective orders and memorandum in support electronically filed by Jon F Kelly on behalf of AT&T Ohio.10
01/08/2009Correction to date stamp indicating entry was filed January 7, 2008 has been changed to January 7, 2009.4
01/08/2009Service Notice2
01/07/2009Service Notice2
01/07/2009Entry on rehearing stating that the application of OCC is denied in accordance with finding (6).3
12/17/2008Memorandum contra the Ohio Consumers' Counsel's application for rehearing electronically filed by Jon F Kelly on behalf of AT&T Ohio.7
12/12/2008Application for rehearing and memorandum in support by the Office of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel electronically filed by Mrs. Mary V. Edwards on behalf of Etter, Terry L. and Office of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel.11
11/13/2008Final approved tariff sheets, PUCO No. 20, updating AT&T Ohio's competitive exchanges electronically filed by Maryann Mackey on behalf of AT&T Ohio.29
11/12/2008Service Notice.2
11/12/2008Finding ordering that AT&T Ohio's application for alternative regulation of BLES and other Tier 1 services is granted; that for the exchanges identified in Attachment A of this Finding and Order, AT&T Ohio is granted Tier 2 pricing flexibility for all Tier 1 noncore services and BLES and basic Caller ID will be subject to pricing flexibility provided for pursuant to Rule 4901:1-4-12 O.A.C..9
10/28/2008Correspondence enclosing AT&T Ohio's responses to Staff's 1st Set of Data Requests, electronically filed by Jon F Kelly on behalf of AT&T Ohio.36
09/23/2008Reply to AT&T Ohio's Memorandum Contra by the Office of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel electronically filed by Mrs. Mary V. Edwards on behalf of Etter, Terry L. and Office of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel13
09/18/2008Memorandum contra the Ohio Consumers' Counsel's opposition electronically filed by Jon F Kelly on behalf of AT&T Ohio.39
09/08/2008Comments in opposition to AT&T Ohio's application for basic local service alternative regulation, demonstration why the application should not be granted and request for hearing by the Office of The Ohio Consumers' Counsel, electronically filed by Mrs. Mary V. Edwards on behalf of Etter, Terry L. and Office of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel.13
08/12/2008Service Notice2
08/12/2008Entry ordering that the motion for a protective order is granted the docketing division should maintain for 18 months from the date of this entry, all documents that are currently under seal and that OCC's motion for intervention is granted in accordance with Finding (5). (JA)3
07/31/2008Motion to intervene and memorandum in support by the Office of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel electronically filed by Patti Mallarnee on behalf of Etter, Terry L Mr.8
07/28/2008Correspondence addressing the application filed on July 25, 2008 electronically filed by Jon F Kelly on behalf of AT&T Ohio3
07/25/2008Confidential document: Exhibit 3 filed by J. Kelly on behalf of Ohio Bell Telephone Company dba AT&T Ohio. (25 pages)1
07/25/2008Motion for a protective order and memorandum in support filed by J. Kelly on behalf of AT&T Ohio.6
07/25/2008Application continued. (Part 2 of 2)112
07/25/2008In the matter of the application of The Ohio Bell Telephone Company dba AT&T Ohio for approval of an alternative form of regulation of a Basic Local Exchange and other Tier 1 services, memorandum in support of application. (Part 1 of 2)151