DIS - Case Record for 07-1312-TP-BLS Skip to main content

Case Record For:

07-1312-TP-BLS

File a Public Comment
Case Title: AT&T OHIO
Status: CL-CLOSED
Industry Code: TP-TELEPHONE
Purpose Code: BLS-Basic Local Exchange Service
Date Opened: 12/28/2007
Date Closed: 9/23/2014
Printable Docket Card Service List
View per page
Date FiledSummaryPages
09/23/2014Case Action Form closing case with an effective date of 9/23/2014. electronically filed by Mrs. Donielle Genesky on behalf of PUCO2
09/16/2013Notice of withdrawal of Counsel submitted by Assistant Attorney General Stephen A. Reilly on behalf of the Staff of the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio. electronically filed by Kimberly L Keeton on behalf of Public Utilities Commission of Ohio.8
01/06/2011Entry ordering that the protective orders shall be extended in accordance with finding (6). (JSA)3
01/06/2011Service Notice3
12/15/2010Correspondence in support of AT&T Ohio's Request for an Extension of the Protective Order electronically filed by Teresa Orahood on behalf of Sage Telecom, Inc.2
11/16/2010Correspondence in Support of AT&T Ohio's Motion electronically filed by Teresa Orahood on behalf of Sage Telecom, Inc.2
11/15/2010Correspondence Letter in Support of Motion for Extension of Protective Orders sought by AT&T Ohio. electronically filed by Carolyn S Flahive on behalf of Verizon Business Services.2
11/12/2010Motion for extension of protective orders and memorandum in support electronically filed by Jon F Kelly on behalf of AT&T Ohio.10
04/05/2010Service Notice3
04/05/2010Entry ordering that the protective orders of January 17, 2008 and May 14, 2008 shall be extended for a period of 18 months from the date of their scheduled expiration. (JA)3
04/02/2010Correspondence clarifying AT&T Ohio's motion to extend the protective order, filed on September 22, 2009, electronically filed by Jon F Kelly on behalf of AT&T Ohio.3
09/25/2009Correspondence letter in support of AT&T motion to extend protective order electronically filed by Carolyn S Flahive on behalf of Verizon Wireless2
09/25/2009Correspondence in support of AT&T motion to extend protective order electronically filed by Carolyn S Flahive on behalf of Verizon Business Services2
09/24/2009Correspondence in support of AT&T Ohio's motion for an extension of the protective orders electronically filed by Teresa Orahood on behalf of Sage Telecom, Inc.2
09/22/2009Motion for extension of protective order and memorandum in support electronically filed by Jon F Kelly on behalf of AT&T Ohio.10
06/20/2008Tariff to amend PUCO No. 20, with updated tariff sheets, electronically filed by Maryann Mackey on behalf of AT&T Ohio.6
05/21/2008Revised tariff PUCO No. 20, to add newly competitive exchanges to the tariff, electronically filed by Maryann Mackey on behalf of AT&T Ohio.31
05/14/2008Service notice.1
05/14/2008Opinion and order ordering AT&T's application for alternative regulation of BLES and other Tier 1 services is granted in part and denied in part; those exchanges identified in Attachments A and B in this opinion and order are granted: AT&T shall provide 30 day notice to customers regarding rate increases; AT&T is authorized to file complete copies of tariffs in final form electronically and one copy in this case docket; OCC's request for a hearing is denied.39
04/21/2008Service Notice.1
04/21/2008Entry ordering that the application be suspended in light of fact that AT&T Ohio has 2 BLES applications currently pending before the Commission, both requiring significant Commission review. (JSA)2
02/26/2008Reply to AT&T Ohio's memorandum contra by the Office of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel filed by T. Etter. 35
02/26/2008Reply to AT&T Ohio memorandum contra filed by T. Etter on behalf of OCC. (35 pgs.)1
02/26/2008Motion for protective order by the Office of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel filed by T. Etter. 3
02/21/2008Memorandum contra the Ohio Consumers' Counsel's opposition filed by J. Kelly on behalf of AT&T Ohio. 47
02/11/2008Opposition to AT&T Ohio's application continued. (Part 2 of 2)105
02/11/2008Opposition to AT&T Ohio's application and demonstration of why the application should not be granted filed on behalf of the OCC by J. Migden-Ostrander. (part 1 of 2)150
02/11/2008Confidential document: Opposition to AT&T Ohio's application filed on behalf of the OCC by J. Migden-Ostrander. 1
02/11/2008Motion for protective order filed on behalf of the Office of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel by T. Etter. 3
01/29/2008Notice to take depositions upon oral examination and request for production of documents propounded upon AT&T Ohio filed by T. Etter on behalf of OCC.3
01/17/2008Entry ordering that the motion for a protective order is granted, docketing division should maintain for 18 months from the date of this entry, all documents that are currently imder seal in this proceeding. It is, further ordered that OCC's motion for intervention is granted, AT&T motion regarding publication of legal notice is granted, the discovery and procedural filing schedule proceed in accordance with Findings (5) and (8). (JA)3
01/17/2008Service Notice1
01/08/2008Motion for an extension of time filed by J. Kelly on behalf of AT&T Ohio.3
01/02/2008Motion to intervene and memorandum in support filed on behalf of the office of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel by T. Etter.7
12/28/2007Application continued. (Part 3 of 3)75
12/28/2007Application continued. (Part 2 of 3)154
12/28/2007Motion for a protective order and memorandum in support on behalf of The Ohio Bell Telephone Company dba AT&T Ohio filed by J. Kelly.6
12/28/2007Confidential Exhibit 3 on behalf of AT&T Ohio filed by J. Kelly. (46 pgs)1
12/28/2007In the matter of the application of The Ohio Bell Telephone Company dba AT&T Ohio for approval of an alternative form of regulation of Basic Local Exchange and other Tier 1 Services. (Part 1 of 3)200