DIS - Case Record for 06-1013-TP-BLS Skip to main content
      
      
CASE NUMBER: 06-1013-TP-BLS
CASE DESCRIPTION: AT&T OHIO
DOCUMENT SIGNED ON: 4/23/2024
DATE OF SERVICE: ________________________________________
09/23/2014 Case Action Form closing case with an effective date of 9/23/2014. electronically filed by Mrs. Donielle Genesky on behalf of PUCO
09/16/2013 Notice of withdrawal of Counsel submitted by Assistant Attorney General Stephen A. Reilly on behalf of the Staff of the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio. electronically filed by Kimberly L Keeton on behalf of Public Utilities Commission of Ohio.
12/22/2011 Supreme Court Document The following decision, announcement or notice of action by the Supreme Court of Ohio with respect to this case is provided solely for the information and convenience of the reader, and should not be construed as a part of the record of this case before the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio, and may be subject to formal revision before it is published in the Ohio Official Reports. The Court’s opinions from 1992 to the present are available online from the Reporter of Decisions at http://www.sconet.state.oh.us/ROD/ - Slip Opinion (Mar. 6, 2003) [Cite as Ohio Consumers’ Counsel v. Pub. Util. Comm.,117 Ohio St.3d 301, 2008-Ohio-861.] electronically filed by Kimberly L Keeton on behalf of Public Utilities Commission of Ohio.
05/19/2011 Entry that AT&T Ohio's motion to dismiss be granted in accordance with Finding (11).
05/19/2011 Service notice.
03/01/2011 Motion to dismiss and memorandum in support electronically filed by Jon F Kelly on behalf of AT&T Ohio
01/07/2011 Entry ordered that the protective orders shall be extended in accordance with Finding (5). (JSA)
01/07/2011 Service Notice
12/16/2010 Correspondence in Support of Motion for Extension of Protective Orders sought by AT&T electronically filed by Carolyn S Flahive on behalf of Verizon Business Services.
12/16/2010 Correspondence in Support of AT&T Ohio's Request for an Extension of the Protective Order electronically filed by Teresa Orahood on behalf of Sage Telecom, Inc.
12/16/2010 Correspondence in Support of Motion for Extension of Protective Orders sought by AT&T Ohio electronically filed by Carolyn S Flahive on behalf of Verizon Wireless.
12/14/2010 Motion for extension of protective orders and memorandum in support electronically filed by Jon F Kelly on behalf of AT&T Ohio.
07/22/2009 Service Notice.
07/22/2009 Entry ordering that the protective orders shall be extended for an additional 18 months in accordance with Finding (5). (JA)
07/01/2009 Letter in support of AT&T's motion for extension of a protective Ooder electronically filed by Mr. Thomas E Lodge on behalf of Verizon Business
07/01/2009 Letter in support of AT&T's motion for extension of a protective order electronically filed by Mr. Thomas E Lodge on behalf of Verizon Wireless
06/30/2009 Correspondence in support of AT&T Ohio's motion for an extension of the protective orders electronically filed by Teresa Orahood on behalf of Sage Telecom, Inc.
06/25/2009 Motion for extension of protective orders and memorandum in support electronically filed by Jon F Kelly on behalf of AT&T Ohio
10/20/2008 Reply to OCC's memorandum contra electronically filed by Mrs. Verneda J. Engram on behalf of AT&T Ohio.
10/08/2008 Memorandum Contra AT&T Ohio's Motion for a Protective Order by the Office of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel electronically filed by Patti Mallarnee on behalf of Etter, Terry L Mr.
09/25/2008 Motion for a protective order and memorandum in support, electronically filed by Jon F Kelly on behalf of AT&T Ohio.
09/12/2008 Reply to AT&T Ohio's show cause pleading of August 29, 2008 by the Office of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel, electronically filed by Mrs. Mary V. Edwards on behalf of Etter, Terry L. and Office of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel.
08/29/2008 AT&T Ohio's response Showing Why Basic Local Exchange Service Alternative Regulation Should Not Be Revoked electronically filed by Jon F Kelly on behalf of AT&T Ohio
08/18/2008 Service Notice
08/15/2008 Entry ordering that OCC's motions set forth reasonable grounds, consistent with finding (7); that AT&T Ohio should file its show cause pleading and OCC should file its reply in accordance with Finding (7). (JSA)
07/11/2008 Reply to AT&T Ohio's Memorandum Contra by The Office of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel electronically filed by Mrs. Mary V. Edwards on behalf of Etter, Terry L. and Office of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel
07/01/2008 Memorandum contra OCC's June 13, 2008 motion electronically filed by Jon F Kelly on behalf of AT&T Ohio.
06/13/2008 Motion and memorandum in support by the Office of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel for an order requiring AT&T Ohio to show cause as to why its alternative regulation Of Basic Local Exchange Service In The Burton, Cheshire, Dresden, Ironton, Lowellville, New Lexington, Rogers and Toronto Exchanges Should Not Be Revoked Pursuant to R.C. 4927.03(C) And Ohio Adm. Code 4901:1-4-12(B) electronically filed by Ms. Deb J. Bingham on behalf of Etter, Terry L.
04/10/2008 Reply to AT&T Ohio's memorandum contra filed by T. Etter on behalf of Ohio Consumers' Counsel.
03/31/2008 Memorandum contra OCC's March 13, 2008 motion filed by J. Kelly on behalf of AT&T Ohio.
03/13/2008 Motion and memorandum in support for an order requiring AT&T Ohio to show cause as to why its alternative regulation of basic local exchange service in eleven exchanges should not be revoked by the office of the Ohio Consumers' Council filed by T. Etter.
02/26/2008 Service Notice
02/25/2008 Entry ordered that the protective orders shall be extended for a period of 18 months. (JA)
02/19/2008 Motion for extension for protective order and memorandum in support filed by J. Kelly on behalf of AT&T Ohio.
05/14/2007 Supreme Court Transmittal papers filed (S.C. No. 07-0659).
04/13/2007 Notice of appeal of appellant the Office of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel filed by D. Bergmann. (Supreme Court No. 07-0659)
04/12/2007 Case Action Form electronically filed by Erin E. Scribner on behalf of Public Utilities Commission of Ohio
04/11/2007 Case Action Form electronically filed by Erin E. Scribner on behalf of Public Utilities Commission of Ohio
02/14/2007 Entry ordered; that the Consumer Groups' application for rehearing is denied, as set forth in this entry; that consistent with our December 20, 2006 Opinion and Order, the record from Case No. 05-1305-TP-ORD should be considered as part of the record in this case, including but not limited to all of the Commission's orders as well as the evidence submitted by the parties in that case.
02/14/2007 Service Notice
01/30/2007 Letter opposing AT&T Ohio's pending rate increase filed by Doris Skene.
01/29/2007 Memorandum contra the Consumers Groups' application for rehearing filed by J. Kelly on behalf of AT&T Ohio.
01/24/2007 Correspondence letter opposing AT&T proposed rate increase filed by Harold D. Friedman.
01/19/2007 Application for rehearing and memorandum in support filed on behalf of OCC by T. Etter, the Appalachian People's Action Coalition by M. Smalz, the Edgemont Neighborhood Coalition by E. Jacobs, the City of Cleveland by R. Triozzi, the City of Toledo by K. Bruce, the Village of Holland by P. Skaff, the City of Maumee by S. McAdams, the City of Northwood by B. Ballenger, the City of Oregon by P. Goldberg, the City of Perrysburg by P. Gwyn, the City of Sylvania by J. Moan and Lucas County filed by L. Keiffer.
01/02/2007 Revised final tariff amendments to PUCO Tariff No. 20, filed on behalf of AT&T Ohio by R. Wentz.
12/20/2006 Opinion and Order, ordering that AT&T Ohio's application for alternative regulation of BLES and other Tier 1 services is granted in part and denied in part; that Consumer Groups' request for a hearing is denied; that to the extent not addressed in this opinion and order, all other arguments are denied; that the docketing division maintain for 18 months from the date of this entry, all documents filed under seal in conjunction with applicants memorandum contra of October 26, 2006.
12/20/2006 Service Notice
12/04/2006 Entry ordering that the application be suspended in accordance with Finding (4). (JA)
12/04/2006 Service Notice
10/31/2006 Reply to AT&T Ohio's memorandum contra filed by T. Etter, OCC; E. Jacobs, Edgemont Neighborhood Coalition; M. Smalz, Appalachian People's Action Coalition; H. Madorsky, City of Cleveland; K. Bruce, City of Toledo; S. McAdams, City of Maumee; B. Ballenger, City of Northwood; P. Goldberg, City of Oregon; P. Gwyn, City of Perrysburg; P. Skaff, Village of Holland; J. Moan, City of Sylvania; L. Keiffer, Lucas County. (public version)
10/31/2006 Confidential target of reply to AT&T Ohio's memorandum contra, filed on behalf of OCC by T. Etter, Appalachian People's Action Coalition by M. Smalz, Edgemont Neighborhood Coalition by E. Jacobs, City of Cleveland by H. Madorsky, City of Toledo by K. Bruce, City of Holland by P. Skaff, City of Maumee by S. McAdams, City of Northwood by B. Ballenger, City of Oregon by P. Goldsberg, City of Perrysville by P. Gwyn, City of Sylvania by J. Moan and Lucas County by L. Keiffer.(45) (FILED UNDER SEAL)
10/30/2006 Motion for protective order and memorandum in support, filed on behalf of AT&T Ohio by J. Kelly.
10/26/2006 Memorandum contra to the Consumers' Group opposition, filed on behalf of AT&T Ohio by J. Kelly.
10/26/2006 Confidential attachment 3, 4, and 5 to memorandum contra The Consumers' Group opposition, filed on behalf of AT&T Ohio by J. Kelly. (15 pages)
10/26/2006 Letter stating attachment 3, 4, and 5 to AT&T Ohio's Memorandum Contra The Consumers' Group opposition, will be filed under seal, filed by J. Kelly.
10/16/2006 Confidential document filed under seal on behalf of OCC opposition to AT&T Ohio application filed by J. Migden-Ostrander. (87 pgs)
10/16/2006 Confidential document filed under seal: Affidavit of Douglas S. Williams filed by OCC. (149 pgs)
10/16/2006 Confidential document filed under seal: Affidavit of Trevor R. Roycroft Ph.D. filed by OCC. (4 pgs)
10/16/2006 Affidavit of Douglas S. Williams filed on behalf of OCC. (Part 2 of 2)
10/16/2006 Affidavit of Douglas S. Williams filed on behalf of OCC. (Part 1 of 2)
10/16/2006 Affidavit of Trevor R. Roycroft, Ph.D. filed on behalf of OCC.
10/16/2006 Opposition to AT&T Ohio's application for basic local service alternative regulation; demonstration of why the application should not be granted on behalf of The OCC, by T. Etter, The Edgemont Neighborhood Coalition, by E. Jacobs, The Appalachian People's Action Coalition, by M. Smalz, The City of Cleveland, by R. Triozzi, The City of Toledo, by K. Bruce, The City of Holland, by P. Skaff, the City of Maumee, by S. McAdams, The City of Northwood, by B. Ballenger, The City of Sylvania, by J. Moan and Lucas County, by L. Keiffer.
09/27/2006 Entry granting the interlocutory appeal in accordance with Finding (9).
09/21/2006 Entry granting in part and denying in part the request for the interlocutory appeal in accordance with Finding (11); that all other arguments and motions are denied. (JSA)
09/21/2006 Entry approving AT&T Ohio's motion to amend and supplement its application in accordance with Finding (3); that OCC's motion for an extension of time is granted in accordance with Finding (7); that objections to AT&T Ohio's application are due October 16, 2006; that discovery should proceed in accordance with finding (7) (JSA)
09/21/2006 Service Notice
09/20/2006 Memorandum of AT&T Ohio contra OCC' s motion for extension of time file by J. Kelly.
09/18/2006 Memorandum contra to OCC's interlocutory appeal, filed on behalf of AT&T Ohio by J. Kelly.
09/18/2006 Attachment to the memorandum in opposition to application for interim review and interlocutory appeal by the office of the Ohio Consumers Counsel, filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell Extended Territories, LLC by C. Bracken.
09/18/2006 Memorandum in opposition to application for interim review and interlocutory appeal by the office of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel, filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell Extended Territories, LLC by D. Hart.
09/15/2006 Motion and memorandum in support to modify timeframe for intervenors to file a statement as to why the application should not be granted, request for expedited ruling filed by T. Etter on behalf of Ohio Consumers' Counsel.
09/13/2006 Letter correcting typographical errors and information inadvertently omitted from the original filing, filed on behalf of applicant by J. Kelly.
09/13/2006 Motion to amend and supplement to application, filed on behalf of applicant by J. Kelly.
09/13/2006 Confidential document Exhibit 3 filed on behalf of AT&T Ohio by J. Kelly. (FILED UNDER SEAL) (434 pages)
09/13/2006 Supplement to application filed on behalf of applicant by J. Kelly.
09/11/2006 Application for review and interlocutory appeal and in the alternative, motion for clarification filed by T. Etter on behalf of The Office of the Ohio Consumers Counsel.
09/08/2006 Replacement Exhibit 4 for AT&T Ohio's application filed on August 11, 2006 filed by J. Kelly.
09/07/2006 Service Notice
09/06/2006 Entry ordering that OCC's motion for an extension of time and request for an expedited ruling is granted in accordance with Finding (4). (JSA).
09/05/2006 Motion for extension of time, memorandum in support filed by T. Etter on behalf lf the Office of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel.
09/01/2006 Entry ordering that the motions for a protective order and the motion for an expedited ruling are granted in accordance with Finding (3); that the docketing division should maintain for 18 months from the date of this entry all documents, that are currently under seal in this proceeding; that the motions for intervention are granted in accordance with Finding (9). (JA)
09/01/2006 Service Notice
08/31/2006 Joint motion for a protective order and request for expedited ruling and memorandum in support, filed on behalf of AT&T Ohio by M. Fenlon and Cincinnati Bell Extended Territories by D. Hart.
08/29/2006 Motion to intervene and memorandum in support, filed on behalf of the Edgemont Neighborhood Coalition by E. Jacobs. (original)
08/25/2006 Motion to intervene and memorandum in support, filed on behalf of Edgemont Neighborhood Coalition by E. Jacobs. (FAX)
08/25/2006 Motion to intervene and memorandum in support filed on behalf of the Northwest Ohio Aggregation Coalition by L. Kovacik (City of Toledo), L. Keiffer (Lucas County), S. McAdams (City of Maumee), B. Ballenger (City of Northwood), P. Goldberg (City of Oregon), J. Moan (City Sylvania), P. Gwyn (City of Perrysburg) and P. Skaff (City of Holland).
08/25/2006 Motion to intervene and memorandum in support, filed on behalf of the City of Cleveland by W. Zigli.
08/24/2006 Motion to intervene and memorandum in support, filed on behalf of the Appalachian People's Action Coalition (APAC) by M. Smalz.
08/23/2006 Letter objecting to the AT&T Ohio rate increase, filed by consumer J. Kriskis.
08/21/2006 Request of AT&T Ohio for an extension of time filed by M. Fenlon.
08/15/2006 Motion to intervene and memorandum in support on behalf of the Office of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel filed by T. Etter.
08/11/2006 Application Continued. (Part 15 of 20)
08/11/2006 Application Continued. (Part 16 of 20)
08/11/2006 Application Continued. (Part 18 of 20)
08/11/2006 Motion for a protective order and memorandum in support filed by J. Kelly on behalf of AT&T Ohio.
08/11/2006 Application Continued. (Part 19 of 20)
08/11/2006 Application Continued. (Part 11 of 20)
08/11/2006 Application Continued. (Part 20 of 20)
08/11/2006 Application Continued. (Part 17 of 20)
08/11/2006 Application Continued. (Part 14 of 20)
08/11/2006 Application Continued. (Part 13 of 20)
08/11/2006 Application Continued. (Part 10 of 20)
08/11/2006 Application Continued. (Part 9 of 20)
08/11/2006 Confidential document: Exhibit 3 filed by J. Kelly on behalf of AT&T Ohio.
08/11/2006 Application Continued. (Part 12 of 20)
08/11/2006 Application Continued. (Part 8 of 20)
08/11/2006 Application Continued (Part 7 of 20)
08/11/2006 Application Continued. (Part 6 of 20)
08/11/2006 Application Continued. (Part 5 of 20)
08/11/2006 Application Continued. (Part 4 of 20)
08/11/2006 Application Continued. (Part 3 of 20)
08/11/2006 Application Continued. (Part 2 of 20)
08/11/2006 In the matter of the application and memorandum in support of application of The Ohio Bell Telephone Company dba AT&T Ohio for approval of an alternative form of regulation of basic local exchange and other tier 1 services pursuant to Chapter 4901:1-4, Ohio Administrative Code. (Part 1 of 20)