|
11/26/2007
|
Memo closing case with and effective date of 11/26/2007. |
|
02/28/2007
|
Service Notice |
|
02/28/2007
|
Opinion and Order stating that this complaint be dismissed for reasons set forth in this order. |
|
11/17/2006
|
Post hearing brief of Ohio Edison Company on behalf M. Whitt. |
|
10/31/2006
|
Brief on hearing before PUCO, Sept. 12, 2006, filed by J. Locker, (complainant). |
|
10/18/2006
|
Service Notice |
|
10/18/2006
|
Entry ordering that Mr. Locker's request for an extension of time to file his initial brief is granted. Accordingly, complainant's initial brief is due to be filed with the Commission's Docketing Division by no later than October 31, 2006. It is further ordered that Ohio Edison's brief is due by November 17, 2006 and Mr. Locker's reply brief is due by December 1, 2006. (GS) |
|
09/27/2006
|
Transcript w/exhibits for hearing held on Tuesday, September 12, 2006 before Greta See, Attorney Examiner. |
|
04/19/2006
|
Service Notice |
|
04/18/2006
|
Entry ordered that a hearing in this matter is scheduled for September 12, 10:00 a.m., at the offices of the Commission, 180 East Broad Street, 11th floor, Hearing Room 11-F, Columbus, Ohio. (GS) |
|
03/16/2006
|
Entry ordering that a telephonic settlement conference be held Friday, April 7, 2006, at 10:00 a.m. at 614-644-1099 (GS). |
|
03/16/2006
|
Service Notice |
|
03/02/2006
|
Entry ordering that a telephonic settlement conference be scheduled for Friday, March 10, 2006, at 10:00 A.M. (GS) |
|
03/02/2006
|
Service Notice |
|
01/13/2006
|
Entry ordered that a conference is schedule for February 1, 2006, at 1:00 p.m., at the offices of the Commission, 180 East Broad Street, 11th Floor, Hearing Room 11-B, Columbus, Ohio 43215 |
|
01/13/2006
|
Service Notice |
|
12/21/2005
|
Answer of Ohio Edison Company filed by A. Korkosz. (ORIGINAL) |
|
12/20/2005
|
Answer of Ohio Edison Company filed by A. Korkosz. (FAX) |
|
12/01/2005
|
Complaint copied and mailed to Ohio Edison Company. |
|
12/01/2005
|
In the matter of the complaint of James A. Locker vs Ohio Edison Company for the allegedly not discontinuing service when requested. |