Date Filed | Summary | Pages |
08/23/2006 | Service Notice | 1 |
08/23/2006 | Entry granting CCB's motion; that complaint is dismissed without prejudice and case closed of record. | 3 |
08/02/2006 | Motion for leave to dismiss its complaint filed by M. Dortch on behalf of complainant. | 4 |
06/27/2006 | Service Notice | 1 |
06/26/2006 | Entry ordering that a telephonic conference be held on July 11, 2006, at 1:30 p.m. at 614-644-1099. (LDJ) | 2 |
12/21/2005 | Entry ordering that a telephone conference be scheduled for February 28, 2006, at 1:30 p.m. (LJ) | 2 |
12/21/2005 | Service notice. | 1 |
12/20/2005 | Notice of change of address filed by M. Dortch on behalf of CCB Ohio, LLC. | 7 |
11/30/2005 | Service Notice | 1 |
11/29/2005 | Entry ordered that a conference by telephone be held in this matter on December 8, 2005, at 1:30 P.M. (LDJ) | 2 |
10/18/2005 | Entry ordered that a settlement conference be held on November 10, 2005, at 1:30 pm in hearing room 11-G of the offices of the Commission, at 180 East Broad Street Columbus, Ohio 43215-3793; that Cincinnati Bell, Inc. is dismissed as a party to this action. (LJ) | 3 |
10/18/2005 | Service Notice | 1 |
10/17/2005 | Answer to amended complaint and response to motion for leave to amend filed by D. Hart on behalf of Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company, LLC. | 8 |
09/30/2005 | Motion for leave to amend complaint to identify the respondent as Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company, LLC filed by M. Dortch on behalf of CCB Ohio, LLC dba Current Communications. | 2 |
09/30/2005 | Amended complaint of CCB Ohio , LLC dba Current Communications seeking a determination by the Commission that the pole attachment procedures used by Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company are unreasonable and discriminatory in their application filed by M. Dortch. | 12 |
09/20/2005 | Answer of CCB Ohio, LLC dba Current Communications filed by D. Hart. | 6 |
08/31/2005 | Complaint service letter and copy of complaint mailed to D. Ringo, CBT. | 1 |
08/04/2005 | In the matter of the complaint of CCB Ohio LLC dba CURRENT Communications (vs) Cincinnati Bell Telephone for the alleged pole attachment procedures are unreasonable and discriminatory. | 18 |