| Date Filed | Summary | Pages |
| 02/13/2015 | Case status form to close cases. | 1 |
| 04/10/2003 | Letter stating that Discount Dialtone, LLC will not be filing an interconnection agreement, filed by S. Howard. | 1 |
| 04/10/2003 | Memo automatically closing case with the effective date of 4/10/2003. | 1 |
| 04/09/2003 | Entry ordering that DDL's request to extend the time period within which the parties must docket their interconnection agreement is granted and that the parties file their entire interconnection agreement for Commission approval by April 10, 2003. (DJ) | 2 |
| 04/09/2003 | Service Notice | 2 |
| 03/28/2003 | Letter stating that SBC Ohio does not oppose DDL's request for an extension for the filing of the interconnection agreement, filed by A. Emerson. | 1 |
| 03/27/2003 | Request for an additional 14 days' extension for the filing of an interconnection agreement, filed on behalf of Discount Dialtone by S. Howard. | 1 |
| 03/10/2003 | Entry ordering that DDL's request to extend the time period within which the parties must docket their interconnection agreement or submit proposed language is granted, that the parties filed their entire interconnection agreement of proposed language for Commission approval by March 28, 2003.(DJ) | 4 |
| 02/27/2003 | Letter requesting a thirty day extension for the interconnection agreement, filed by M. Stemm. | 1 |
| 02/26/2003 | Letter on behalf of Discount Dialtone, LLC requesting an additional 30 days extension for the filing of an interconnection agreement, filed by S. Howard. | 1 |
| 02/21/2003 | Entry granting DDL's request to extend the time period within which the parties must docket their interconnection agreement or submit proposed language; that the parties file their entire interconnection agreement for Commission approval by February 27, 2003. (LDJ) | 2 |
| 02/21/2003 | Service Notice. | 2 |
| 02/14/2003 | Letter stating that SBC Ohio does not oppose DDL's request for a two-week extension for the filing of an interconnection agreement, filed by A. Emerson. | 1 |
| 02/13/2003 | Letter on behalf of Discount Dialtone, LLC, requesting an additional two week extension for the filing of an interconnection agreement, filed by S. Howard. | 1 |
| 01/02/2003 | Service Notice | 2 |
| 12/31/2002 | Entry granting DDL's request to extend the time period within which the parties must docket their interconnection agreement or submit proposed language; that the parties file their entire interconnection agreement or proposed language for Commission approval by February 14, 2003. (LDJ) | 2 |
| 12/13/2002 | Request for a 60-day extension, or until February 14, 2003, for the filing of an entire interconnection agreement, filed by S. Howard. | 1 |
| 11/26/2002 | Entry ordering that DDL's request to extend the time period within which the parties must docket their interconnection agreement or submit proposed language is granted; that the parties file their entire interconnection agreement or proposed language for Commission approval by December 16, 2002. (LDJ) | 2 |
| 11/24/2002 | Service Notice. | 1 |
| 11/14/2002 | Letter agreeing to DDL'S request for 30 day extension of time filed on behalf of SBC Ameritech Ohio by M. Stemm. | 2 |
| 11/13/2002 | Request for an extension of at least 30 days or until December 16, 2002 to allow discount Dialtone, LLC to comply with the second and third ordering paragraphs of the October 31, 2002 arbitration award, filed by S. Howard. | 4 |
| 10/31/2002 | Entry ordering that Ameritech's motion for protective order filed October 10, 2002, is granted for a period of 18 months from the date of this arbitration award. | 14 |
| 10/10/2002 | Service Notice | 2 |
| 10/10/2002 | Entry ordering that DDL's interlocutory appeal is denied in its entirely. | 5 |
| 10/10/2002 | Confidential version of Discount Dialtone, LLC reply brief filed by S. Howard. (FILED UNDER SEAL) | 19 |
| 10/10/2002 | Confidential version of SBC Ameritech Ohio's reply brief filed by A. Emerson. (FILED UNDER SEAL) | 37 |
| 10/10/2002 | SBC Ameritech Ohio's reply brief, public version, filed by M Stemm | 36 |
| 10/10/2002 | Letter stating confidential version of SBC Ameritech Ohio's reply brief has been filed, filed by A. Emerson. | 1 |
| 10/10/2002 | Reply brief of Discount Dialtone, LLC filed by S. Howard. | 17 |
| 10/03/2002 | Confidential portion of transcript and exhibits held on September 19, 2002. (FILED UNDER SEAL) | 179 |
| 10/03/2002 | Transcript continue. (part 2 of 2) | 274 |
| 10/03/2002 | Confidential filing of SBC Ameritech Ohio's motion for protective order filed by M. Stemm. (FILED UNDER SEAL) | 41 |
| 10/03/2002 | Confidential filing motion for a protective order on behalf of applicant filed by S. Howard. (FILED UNDER SEAL) | 20 |
| 10/03/2002 | Transcript filed for hearing held September 19, 2002, (DJ) 200 pgs., Submitted. (part 1 of 2) | 200 |
| 10/01/2002 | SBC Ameritech Ohio's motion for protective order filed by M. Stemm. | 6 |
| 10/01/2002 | SBC Ameritech Ohio initial post-hearing brief public version filed by M. Stemm. | 40 |
| 10/01/2002 | Initial post-hearing brief of Discount Dialtone, LLC filed by P. Downey. | 19 |
| 09/30/2002 | Entry ordering that the interlocutory appeal filed by DDL shall be certified to the Commission for consideration of its merits. (LDJ) | 7 |
| 09/18/2002 | Memorandum contra Discount Dialtone's interlocutory appeal, filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by D. Conway. | 13 |
| 09/13/2002 | Application for review in support of interlocutory appeal, filed on behalf of Discount Dialtone by S. Howard. | 34 |
| 09/12/2002 | Exhibit 3A of Transcript filed for hearing held September 19, 2002, before Attorney Examiner, L. Douglas Jennings. (DJ) | 24 |
| 09/12/2002 | Confidential responses to discovery filed on behalf of Discount Dialtone, LLC by S. Howard. (FILED UNDER SEAL) | 271 |
| 09/12/2002 | Confidential version of direct testimony of Marc Novak, Kent A. Currie and Deborah Fuentes Niziolek filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by M. Stemm. (FILED UNDER SEAL) | 116 |
| 09/12/2002 | Confidential testimony of Michael Starkey filed on behalf of Discount Dialtone, LLC by S. Howard. (FILED UNDER SEAL) | 46 |
| 09/12/2002 | Arbitration package filed on behalf of Discount Dialtone, LLC by S. Howard. | 103 |
| 09/12/2002 | Public version of direct testimony of Deborah Fuentes Niziolek filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio. | 36 |
| 09/12/2002 | Motion for protective order and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by M. Stemm. | 7 |
| 09/12/2002 | Public version of direct testimony of Kent A. Currie filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio. | 15 |
| 09/12/2002 | Testimony of Helen Watkins filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio. | 12 |
| 09/12/2002 | Motion for protective order and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Discount Dialtone, LLC by S. Howard. | 3 |
| 09/12/2002 | Arbitration package filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by M. Stemm. | 3 |
| 09/11/2002 | Service Notice. | 1 |
| 09/11/2002 | Entry denying DDL's motion to compel discovery. (DJ) | 3 |
| 09/11/2002 | Entry granting Ameritech's motion to strike Issue 3 as an issue for arbitration. (DJ) | 3 |
| 09/06/2002 | Motion to compel discovery and request for expedited ruling and memorandum in support filed by S. Howard on behalf of Discount Dialtone, LLC. | 21 |
| 09/05/2002 | Reply to Discount Dialtone's memorandum contra its motion to strike arbitration Issue No. 3, filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by D. Conway. | 9 |
| 09/03/2002 | Filing schedules filed on behalf of the PUCO staff by D. Jennings. | 2 |
| 08/30/2002 | Memorandum contra motion to strike Issue No. 3, filed on behalf of Discount Dialtone by S. Howard. | 4 |
| 08/16/2002 | Responses to Discount Dialtone's petition for arbitration, filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by D. Conway. | 15 |
| 08/14/2002 | SBC Ameritech Ohio's motion to strike discount DialTOne, LLC's arbitration issue No. 3 filed by D. Conway. | 6 |
| 08/13/2002 | Letter confirming that a prehearing conference involving Discount Dialtone, LLC and Ameritech Ohio, is Scheduled for Tuesday, August 20, 2002 at 10:00 a.m. filed by staff D. Jennings. | 2 |
| 07/22/2002 | In the matter of the application of Discount Dialtone, LLC's petition for arbitration pursuant to Section 252(b) of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 to establish an interconnection agreement with Ameritech Ohio. | 137 |