DIS - Case Record for 02-0579-TP-CSS Skip to main content

Case Record For:

02-0579-TP-CSS

File a Public Comment
Case Title: CORECOMM NEWCO, INC vs AMERITECH, OHIO
Status: AR-Archived
Industry Code: TP-TELEPHONE
Purpose Code: CSS-Complaint on service or safety
Date Opened: 3/1/2002
Date Closed: 11/26/2002
Printable Docket Card Service List
View per page
Date FiledSummaryPages
01/15/2010Confidential release per Entry filed 11/26/2002. (Part 1 of 2)150
01/15/2010Confidential release per Entry filed 11/26/2002. (Part 2 of 2)132
02/19/2004Entry ordering that SBC Ohio's motion to lift the winback restrictions is granted as set forth in this entry.4
02/19/2004Service Notice2
12/01/2003Reply filed on behalf of respondent, SBC Ohio, by J. Kelly.4
11/26/2003 Memorandum Contra SBC Ohio's submission of supplemental authority, filed on behalf of Corecomm Newco, Inc. by T. O'Brien and MCImetro Access Transmission Services, LLC by J. Sanders.4
11/20/2003Submission of supplemental authority, filed on behalf of SBC Ohio by J. Kelly.5
07/25/2003Reply filed on behalf of SBC Ohio by J. Kelly.20
07/22/2003Attachment to memorandum contra filed on July 21, 2003, filed on behalf of CoreComm Newco, Inc. by T. O'Brien.24
07/21/2003Memorandum contra SBC Ohio's motion to lift the winback restriction, filed on behalf of CoreCom Newco, Inc. by T. O'Brien and MCImetro Access Transmission Services, LLP by J. Sanders.5
07/09/2003Motion to lift the Winback Restruction on behalf of SBC Ohio filed by J. Kelly.33
01/23/2003Entry denying SBC Ohio's application for rehearing as set forth in this entry; to the extent not specifically addressed herein, all other arguments raised in the application for rehearing are denied; that the Commission's Opinion & Order is clarified in accordance with this entry; that SBC Ohio file the requisite tariff revisions consistent with this entry.16
01/08/2003Affidavit of James D. Webber, Attachment 1, to the Memorandum Contra of CoreComm Newco, Inc to SBC's application for rehearing, filed by T. O'Brien.4
01/06/2003Memorandum Contra to SBC-Ohio's application for rehearing filed on behalf of CoreComm Newco, Inc by T. O'Brien.17
12/26/2002Application for rehearing and memorandum in support filed on behalf of respondent, SBC Ameritech Ohio, by J. Kelly.24
12/10/2002Affidavit of Deborah D. Fuentes Niziolek filed by M. Fenlon.3
12/06/2002Affidavit of John A. Chesta and Deborah D. Fuentes Niziolek filed by M. Fenlon.5
11/26/2002Ordered that CoreComm's complaint is granted and denied in part; ordered that to the extent not addressed in this order all other allegations are denied; that the 30 day restriction regarding Ameritech's winback promotions shall remain in place; that Ameritech file the requisite tariff revisions consistent with this order; that Ameritech informally provide the requisite contribution analysis on a going forward basis consistent with this order; that Ameritech work with CoreComm to address future identified wholesale problems in a timely manner; that Ameritech file an affidavit updating its use of "836" line loss notices for the purpose of commencing winback promotions; that Ameritech file an affidavit updating its wholesale offering of Caller ID with name, that the docketing division should maintain for 18 months from the date of this order all documents that have been granted protective status in this docket.44
10/01/2002Ameritech Ohio's supplemental authority filed by J. Kelly.11
09/20/2002Supreme Court Transmittal Papers.7
09/20/2002Service Notice.2
09/20/2002Supreme Court Transmittal Papers.7
08/22/2002Notice of Appeal filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by A. Lucas.22
07/18/2002Entry denying Ameritech Ohio's application for rehearing.12
07/03/2002Reply brief filed on behalf of OCC by J. Serio.14
07/03/2002Reply brief filed on behalf of complainant, CoreComm Newco, by T. O'Brien.36
07/03/2002Reply brief filed on behalf of MCImetro Access Transmission Services by J. Sanders.34
07/03/2002Reply brief filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by J. Kelly.28
06/17/2002Post hearing brief of CoreComm Newco, Inc. filed by S. Bloomfield.44
06/17/2002Initial post hearing brief of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel filed by J. Serio.14
06/17/2002Ameritech Ohio's initial brief filed by J. Kelly.104
06/12/2002Continue Transcript held on May 29, 2002 (part 4 of 5).200
06/12/2002Continue Transcript held on May 29, 2002 (part 5 of 5).168
06/12/2002Transcript filed for hearing held on May 29, 2002 complaint and Motion of CoreComm Newco, Inc. vs. Ameritech-Ohio respondent. (part 1 of 5).200
06/12/2002Continue Transcript held on May 29, 2002 (part 3 of 5).200
06/12/2002Continue Transcript held on May 29, 2002 (part 2 of 5).200
06/04/2002Entry ordering that the application for rehearing is granted for the limited purpose of allowing the Commission additional time to consider the issued raised on rehearing.2
06/04/2002Service notice.2
05/28/2002Memorandum in support of Ameritech's motion to strike portions of the rebuttal testimony of James D. Webber, filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by M. Fenlon.4
05/28/2002Motion to strike portions of the rebuttal testimony of James D. Webber, filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by M. Fenlon.3
05/24/2002Transcript filed for hearing held May 10, 2002, (JA), 108 pgs., Continued. (Volume III) (PUCO-Columbus, Ohio)108
05/23/2002Memorandum contra Ameritech Ohio's application for rehearing, filed on behalf of CoreComm Newco by T. O'Brien; and MCImetro Transmission Access by J. Sanders.13
05/23/2002Transcript continued. (Part 2 of 2)333
05/23/2002Transcript filed for hearing held May 9, 2002, (JA), Continued. (Volume II) (PUCO-Columbus, OH) (Part 1 of 2)200
05/22/2002Motion for protective order and memorandum in support with attached confidential information, filed on behalf of CoreComm Newco by T. O'Brien. (FILED UNDER SEAL)3
05/22/2002Confidential Exhibit 3, supplemental response to respondent's first set of interrogatories and first request for production of documents, filed on behalf of CoreComm Newco by T. O'Brien. (FILED UNDER SEAL)254
05/22/2002Transcript continued. (Part 2 of 2)98
05/22/2002Transcript filed for hearing held May 8, 2002, (JA), 298 pgs., Continued. (PUCO-Columbus, OH) (Volume I) (Part 1 of 2)200
05/22/2002Pre-filed rebuttal testimony of James D. Webber continued. (Part 2 of 2)168
05/22/2002Pre-filed rebuttal testimony of James D. Webber, filed on behalf of CoreComm Newco by T. O'Brien. (Part 1 of 2)200
05/22/2002Motion for protective order and memorandum in support filed on behalf of CoreComm Newco by T. O'Brien.3
05/22/2002Letter regarding the rebuttal testimony of Lance McNiel, filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by J. Kelly.2
05/22/2002Rebuttal testimony of Lance McNiel filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by J. Kelly.4
05/13/2002Application for rehearing filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by J. Kelly.25
05/07/2002Motion to dismiss and memorandum in support filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by M. Fenlon.94
05/07/2002Motion for leave to file amended complaint and memorandum in support filed on behalf of complainant, CoreComm Newco, by T. O'Brien.2
05/07/2002Amended complaint filed on behalf of complainant, CoreComm Newco, by T. O'Brien.2
05/03/2002Motion to intervene of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel filed by J. Serio.7
05/02/2002Notice of participation by the staff of the PUCO, filed by J. Bair.2
05/01/2002Letter regarding the direct expert testimony of Dr. Debra J. Aron, filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by J. Kelly.2
05/01/2002Direct testimony of Debra J. Aron filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by J. Kelly.32
05/01/2002Pre-filed testimony of E. Philip Smith filed on behalf of complainant, CoreComm Newco, by T. O'Brien.9
05/01/2002Pre-filed testimony of James D. Webber filed on behalf of complainant, CoreComm Newco, by T. O'Brien.49
04/29/2002Service Notice.1
04/29/2002Entry ordering that a prehearing conference is scheduled for 5/2/02, at 1:30 p.m. in hearing room 11-F at the offices of the Commission1
04/11/2002Service notice1
04/11/2002Entry ordering that Ameritech temporarily modify its winback program in accordance with Finding 5.5
04/08/2002Memorandum contra Ameritech Ohio's Application for review, filed by S. Bloomfield.9
04/02/2002Ameritech Ohio's application for review by J. Kelly.10
03/28/2002Entry scheduling a hearing at 10:00 a.m. on May 8, 2002, Hearing Room 11-D, Commission offices; that expert testimony be filed in accordance with Finding 4; that MCIm is granted intervention in accordance and to the extent set forth in Finding 7. (AE)5
03/15/2002Memorandum contra MCImetro's motion to intervene, filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by J. Kelly.8
03/12/2002Motion for leave to intervene or, alternatively, memorandum in support of CoreComm complaint and motion for immediate order, filed on behalf of MCI Metro Access Transmission Services by J. Sanders.18
03/12/2002Answer filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by J. Kelly.5
03/12/2002Memorandum contra CoreComm's motion for an immediate order, filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by J. Kelly.53
03/05/2002Entry ordering that Ameritech file its response to the motion for an immediate order on or before March 12, 2002; Ameritech should file its answer to CoreComm's complaint by March 12, 2002. (AE)2
03/01/2002In the matter of the complaint and motion of CoreComm Newco, Inc. (vs) Ameritech Ohio requesting an immediate order requiring Ameritech Ohio to cease and desist from engaging in winback programs.15