|
02/11/2003
|
Tariff page filed on behalf of applicant the Exchange Rate Tariff PUCO No. 3 section 3, 8th revised page 7, cancels 7th revised page 7, (Cincinnati) by E. King. |
|
01/31/2003
|
Revised tariff sheets, reflecting the establishment of two-way extended area services between Verizon North, Inc.exhcange of Oxford and The Cincinnati Bell Telephone Exchange of Cincinnati by T. Colquitt. |
|
11/12/2002
|
Letter stating that Cincinnati Bell Telephone Co. and Verizon North Inc. have established March 4, 2003 as the implementation date for two-way non-optional flat rate for EAS between CBT's Cincinnati exchange and the Oxford exchange served by Verizon North Inc., filed on behalf of CBT by E. King. |
|
10/22/2002
|
Letter stating that the in-service date for the institution of two-way flat-rate EAS between Verizon's Oxford exchange and Cincinnati Bell Telephone Co.'s Cincinnati exchange will be March 4, 2003 at 12:01 am, filed on behalf of respondent, Verizon North, by T. Colquitt. |
|
09/18/2002
|
Finding & Order approving the stipulation filed on July 30, 2002, in its entirety; that Verizon and Cincinnati Bell are authorized to provide two-way, nonoptional, flat-rate EAS between the Oxford Exchange and the Cincinnati Exchange. |
|
09/03/2002
|
Letter stating that Verizon would not incur exceptionally heavy investments in facilities to provide EAS in the specific case, as proposed by the stipulation filed July 30, 2002, filed on behalf of respondent, Verizon North, by P. Cook. |
|
08/26/2002
|
Response regarding cost statistics filed on behalf of respondent, Cincinnati Bell Telephone Co., by E. King. |
|
07/30/2002
|
Stipulation agreement and recommendation on behalf of Oxford Exchange, P. Lykins, Verizon North Inc. W. Keating, United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint J. Stewart, Ameritech Ohio M. Fenlon, Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company A. Kinney. |
|
06/21/2002
|
Supplemental information response of Ameritech Ohio filed by J. Kelly |
|
05/24/2002
|
Information response filed on behalf of respondent, Verizon North, by P. Cook. (Fax copy) |
|
05/24/2002
|
Information response filed on behalf of respondent, Cincinnati Bell Telephone Co., by E. King. |
|
05/24/2002
|
Information response filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by J. Kelly. |
|
05/23/2002
|
Information response filed on behalf of respondent, United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint, by J. Stewart. |
|
05/08/2002
|
Affidavit of Melissa O'Leary filed on behalf of LCI International Telecom Corp. by M. O'Leary. |
|
05/06/2002
|
Joint affidavit of Verizon Long Distance and Verizon Enterprise Solutions filed by K. Roberts-Murphy. |
|
04/18/2002
|
Affidavit of Dorinda Lanier on behalf of Sprint Communications Company L.P. |
|
04/05/2002
|
Answer of Ameritech Ohio, filed by J. Kelly. |
|
04/05/2002
|
Answer of Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company, filed by C. Wilson. |
|
04/04/2002
|
Affidavit of Elizabeth Finnerty on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio, Inc. |
|
04/04/2002
|
Answer filed on behalf of United Telephone Company of Ohio d/b/a Sprint filed by B. Donahue |
|
04/02/2002
|
Answer of Verizon North Inc. by W. Keating. |
|
03/15/2002
|
Service Notice. |
|
03/14/2002
|
Entry scheduling a teleconference at 9:00 a.m. on June 5, 2002; that Verizon, Cincinnati Bell, Ameritech and Sprint file their answers by April 5, 2002; that AT&T, WorldCom, Qwest, Verizon Long Distance, Verizon Select and Sprint Communications provide the information as required by Finding 5; that Verizon , Cincinnati Bell, Ameritech, and Sprint coordinate all calling information in accordance with Finding 7 and ensure that all the IXCs are supplying calling data from the same time frame. (AE) |
|
03/01/2002
|
Amendment to petition, filed on behalf of complainant by P. Lykins. |
|
02/11/2002
|
In the matter of a EAS request form of spokesperson Patty Lykins vs. Verizon. |
|
02/11/2002
|
In the matter of a complaint of Patty Lykins vs. Verizon. |