Case Record For: 01-2771-TP-CSS File a Public Comment Case Title: AMERITECH OHIO Status: AR-Archived Industry Code: TP-TELEPHONE Purpose Code: CSS-Complaint on service or safety Date Opened: 10/29/2001 1:00:00 AM Date Closed: Case Documents Public Comments Parties of Record Related Cases Printable Docket Card Service List View All 1 - 15 of 60 documents 1 / 4 Date FiledSummaryPages 10/21/2015Memo archiving cases with an effective date of 10/21/15, electronically filed by Mr. Jeffrey R. Jones on behalf of Public Utilities Commission of Ohio.2 08/11/2009Memo requesting archival of cases effective 08/11/09.1 05/28/2004Service Notice for Supreme Court Transmittal Papers.2 05/28/2004Supreme Court transmittal papers for Case # 01-2771-TP-CSS. (S.C. No. 04-705)7 04/29/2004Notice of appeal of appellant XO Ohio, Inc.filed by T. Rodgers.5 03/04/2004Second Entry on Rehearing ordering that the application is denied and that XO take steps to implement its proposed customer notification plan including filing an application seeking approval of its proposed tariff amendment.3 03/04/2004Service Notice2 02/11/2004Entry ordering that the application for rehearing is granted for the limited purpose of allowing the Commission additional time to consider the issues raised on rehearing.2 02/11/2004Service Notice2 02/02/2004Plan to communicate XO Ohio, Inc.'s disconnection plan to customers filed by T. Rodgers.8 01/22/2004Memorandum in opposition to rehearing, filed on behalf of P.S. Executive Centers' by K. Osterkamp.6 01/15/2004Application for Rehearing of XO Ohio, Inc. filed by J. Bentine.12 12/18/2003Service Notice2 12/17/2003Opinion & Order dismissing SBC as a respondent in this proceeding; that this complaint is granted, with respect to XO, as set forth in this order; that XO should file with the Commission, within 45 days from the issuance of this order, a proposed plan, or evidence of an existing plan, ensuring communication of XO's retail disconnection policy to its customers; that upon review of the proposed plan, the Commission will determine whether the process is sufficient or whether additional action is necessary.27 02/18/2003Post-hearing brief filed on behalf of respondent, XO Ohio, by T. Rodgers.18 1 / 4 Attorney General: Attorney Examiner: Sheets, Kerry