| Date Filed | Summary | Pages |
| 10/11/2006 | Entry ordered that this docket be closed of record at this time. | 3 |
| 10/11/2006 | Service Notice | 6 |
| 08/28/2002 | Notice of substitution of counsel filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio and TCG Ohio by D. Trabaris. | 1 |
| 06/24/2002 | Reply to memorandum in opposition to motion to supplement the record file by D. Bergmann. | 9 |
| 06/14/2002 | Memorandum of the Ohio Telecom Association in opposition to motion to supplement the record, filed by T. Lodge. | 5 |
| 05/30/2002 | Motion to supplement the record and memorandum in support filed on behalf of OCC by D. Bergmann. | 18 |
| 04/12/2002 | Response letter on behalf of the Ohio Township Association, requesting the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio adopt the Extended Area Service (EAS) plan recommended by the Ohio Consumers' Counsel (OCC), file by M. Cochran. | 1 |
| 04/04/2002 | Certificate of service filed by D. Bergmann on behalf of OCC. | 2 |
| 04/04/2002 | Letter concerning the stamped date and mailing date of received comments, by G. Minnick. (FAX) | 1 |
| 04/03/2002 | Gail Minnick's additional comments regarding the extended area service (EAS) process. | 16 |
| 04/02/2002 | Letter on behalf of the membership of the Ohio Farmers Union, request the adoption of the EAS (Extended area service) plan recommended by the Ohio Consumers' Counsel (OCC) by B. Liemann. | 5 |
| 04/02/2002 | Comments of the Greene County Telephone Coalition by P. Tallman. | 2 |
| 04/01/2002 | Reply comments of Verizon North Inc. filed by T. Lodge. | 5 |
| 04/01/2002 | Reply comments of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint and Sprint Communications company L.P. filed by J. Stewart. | 18 |
| 04/01/2002 | Reply comments of the Ohio Telecom Association filed by T. Lodge. | 12 |
| 04/01/2002 | Reply comments of Ameritech Ohio filed by J. Kelly. | 15 |
| 04/01/2002 | Reply comments of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel and the Appalachian Peoples Action Coalition filed by D. Bergmann and M. Smalz. | 56 |
| 04/01/2002 | Reply comments of AT&T Communications of Ohio, Inc. TCG Ohio and WorldCom, Inc. filed by J. Sanders. | 6 |
| 03/29/2002 | Reply comments filed on behalf of The Ashtabula County Telephone Coalition by E. Schaeffer. | 45 |
| 03/28/2002 | Reply comments filed on behalf of Cincinnati Bell Telephone Co. by J. Kinney. | 9 |
| 02/19/2002 | Certificate of Service of CenturyTel of Ohio, Inc., filed by V. Norris | 2 |
| 02/05/2002 | Certificate of service filed on behalf of the Chillicothe Telephone Company by L. Claytor. | 2 |
| 01/31/2002 | Certificate of Service, filed by D. Bergmann. | 2 |
| 01/30/2002 | Attachments to Ameritech Ohio's initial comments filed by J. Kelly (FILED UNDER SEAL) (Filed 1/29/02) | 16 |
| 01/29/2002 | Comments of the Ohio Telecom Association filed by T. Lodge. | 8 |
| 01/29/2002 | Comments of Verizon North Inc. of the Commission's Extended Area Service rules filed by T. Lodge. | 11 |
| 01/29/2002 | Comments of Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company filed by J. Kinney. | 12 |
| 01/29/2002 | Comments of CenturyTel of Ohio Inc filed by the Ohio Telecom Association. | 6 |
| 01/29/2002 | Ameritech Ohio's motion for protective order, filed by J. Kelly. | 7 |
| 01/29/2002 | Ameritech Ohio's Initial comments filed by J. Kelly. | 15 |
| 01/29/2002 | Comments of ALLTEL Ohio Inc. and the Western Reserve Telephone Co. filed by T. Lodge. | 9 |
| 01/29/2002 | Joint comments of AT&T and WorldCom filed by D. Chorzempa. | 6 |
| 01/29/2002 | Comments of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel. | 123 |
| 01/28/2002 | Comments of the Ashtabula County Telephone Coalition filed by E. Schaeffer. | 4 |
| 01/28/2002 | Response letter to the review of the Commission's Extended Area Service rules filed by L. Claytor. | 4 |
| 01/28/2002 | Comments of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint and Sprint Communications Company L.P. filed by J. Stewart. | 8 |
| 01/23/2002 | Comments filed by Gail Minnick. | 2 |
| 01/22/2002 | Letter supporting the recommendation put forth by OCC filed by Thomas B. deHaas Jr. | 1 |
| 01/22/2002 | Correspondence letter from Thomas B. deHaas Jr. | 1 |
| 01/22/2002 | Correspondence letter regarding the application, filed by Thomas deHaas, Jr. | 1 |
| 01/22/2002 | Correspondence letter from Thomas B. deHaas Jr. | 1 |
| 01/17/2002 | Service notice | 2 |
| 01/16/2002 | Entry ordering that OCC's motion filed on November 20, 2001 is held in abeyance in accordance with Finding 5. (AE) | 3 |
| 12/17/2001 | Reply memorandum of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel filed by D. Bergmann. | 8 |
| 12/05/2001 | Memorandum of Ameritech Ohio contra motion to require filing of eas pilot information prior to filing of comments; motion to require uniform filing of eas pilot information; motion for commission protective order giving the OCC access to eas pilot information, C. Rawlings. | 8 |
| 12/05/2001 | Memorandum of Ameritech Ohio contra OCC's motion to require filing of Eas Pilot information prior to filing of comments; motion to require uniform filing of Eas Pilot information; motion for Commission protective order giving the OCC access to Eas Pilot information, filed by J. Stewart. | 3 |
| 12/05/2001 | Memorandum of Cincinnati Bell Telephone in response to motions of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel, filed by C. Wilson. | 5 |
| 12/05/2001 | Memorandum of the Verizon North Inc. in response to motions of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel, filed by T. Lodge. | 5 |
| 12/05/2001 | Memorandum of the Ohio Telecom Association in response to motions of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel, filed by T. Lodge. | 4 |
| 11/20/2001 | Motion to require filing of EAS Pilot Information prior to filing of comments; Motion to require uniform filing of EAS Pilot Information; Motion for Commission protective order giving the OCC access to EAS Pilot Information and memorandum in support, filed on behalf of OCC by D. Bergmann. | 8 |
| 11/01/2001 | Service Notice. | 40 |
| 10/31/2001 | Entry ordering that all large ILECs and other interested persons file comments in response to the questions posed in Finding 5 within 90 days of the date of this entry; reply comments should be filed within 60 days of the filing of initial comments, and shall be served upon all of those persons who have filed initial comments. | 4 |
| 09/25/2001 | Service Notice. | 2 |
| 09/25/2001 | Entry ordering that a notice be forwarded to the Joint Committee on Agency Rule Review notifying them on the Commission's determination and assigning a new review date for Chapter 4901:1-7, O.A.C. | 2 |
| 09/21/2001 | Comments filed on behalf of The Ashtabula County Telephone Coalition by E. Schaeffer. | 5 |
| 09/19/2001 | Comments filed on behalf of OCC by D. Bergmann. | 6 |
| 09/19/2001 | Initial comments filed on behalf of The Ohio Telecommunications Industry Assoc. by T. Lodge. | 2 |
| 09/19/2001 | Comments filed on behalf of Verizon North by T. Lodge. | 3 |
| 09/19/2001 | Comments filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by C. Rawlings. | 2 |
| 09/18/2001 | Comments filed on behalf of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint and Sprint Communications Company L.P. by J. Stewart. | 1 |
| 09/05/2001 | Service Notice. | 1 |
| 09/05/2001 | Entry ordering that interested persons desiring to comment on the Commission's tentative conclusions set forth in Finding 2 shall have until September 19, 2001, to file such comments with the Commission. | 2 |
| 08/29/2001 | In the matter of the Review of the Commission's Extended Area Service Rules found in chapter 4901:1-7, Ohio Administrative Code. | 1 |