| Date Filed | Summary | Pages |
| 06/11/2002 | Entry ordering that the parties joint motion to dismiss this case with prejudice is granted and closed of record. | 2 |
| 06/11/2002 | Service notice. | 2 |
| 05/28/2002 | Joint motion to dismiss filed on behalf of complainant by K. Betts; and respondent, Toledo Edison Co., by J. Burk. | 2 |
| 02/08/2002 | Entry scheduling a settlement conference at 1:30 p.m. on March 4, 2002, Hearing Room 11-F, Commission offices. (AE) | 4 |
| 06/15/2001 | Reply brief filed on behalf of respondent, Toledo Edison, by J. Burk. (Original copy) | 11 |
| 06/15/2001 | Reply brief filed on behalf of respondent, Toledo Edison Co., by J. Burk. (Fax copy) | 10 |
| 06/15/2001 | Reply brief filed on behalf of complainant, North Star BHP Steel, by K. Betts. | 9 |
| 06/04/2001 | Initial brief filed on behalf of respondent, Toledo Edison Co., by J. Burk. (Original copy) | 14 |
| 06/01/2001 | Initial brief filed on behalf of complainant, North Star BHP Steel by K. Betts. | 13 |
| 06/01/2001 | Initial brief filed on behalf of respondent, Toledo Edison Co., by J. Burk. (Fax copy) | 13 |
| 05/21/2001 | Transcript, (151 pgs), and exhibits for hearing held 5/8/01, submitted. (GP) | 160 |
| 05/21/2001 | Complainants exhibits (FILED UNDER SEAL) | 31 |
| 04/16/2001 | Entry rescheduling hearing to 5/8/01, 10:00 a.m., Hearing Room 11D, Commission offices; direct, expert testimony shall be filed no later than 7 days prior to the hearing; motion granted for admission of Kirk Howard Betts to act as counsel for North Star. (AE) | 3 |
| 04/16/2001 | Service Notice. | 2 |
| 04/10/2001 | Answer opposing motion for stay of proceedings pending Commission determination of threshold legal issue and motion for continuance of the hearing, filed on behalf of complainant by K. Betts. (Original copy) (FAXED 4/09/01) | 10 |
| 04/09/2001 | Answer opposing motion for stay of proceedings pending Commission determination of threshold legal issue and motion for continuance of the hearing filed on behalf of complainant by K. Betts. (Fax copy) | 10 |
| 04/06/2001 | Motion for stay of proceedings pending Commission determination of threshold legal issue and motion for continuance of the hearing and memorandum in support filed on behalf of respondent, Toledo Edison Co., by J. Burk. (Original copy) (FILED 4/5/01) | 8 |
| 04/06/2001 | Motion for stay of proceedings pending Commission determination of threshold legal issue and motion for continuance of the hearing and memorandum in support filed on behalf of respondent, Toledo Edison Co., by J. Burk. (Fax copy) (FAXED 4/05/01) | 8 |
| 02/07/2001 | Entry ordering that the hearing be rescheduled to begin on April 11, 2001, at 10:00 a.m. at the Commission offices, Hearing Room 11-D. (AE) | 1 |
| 02/06/2001 | Motion for continuance and memorandum in support filed on behalf of respondent, Toledo Edison Company, by J. Burk. | 4 |
| 02/05/2001 | Motion for continuance and memorandum in support filed on behalf of respondent, Toledo Edison, by J. Burk. | 3 |
| 12/26/2000 | Service Notice. | 1 |
| 12/22/2000 | Entry ordering that the hearing be rescheduled to begin on February 13, 2001, at 10:00 a.m. at the Commission offices. (AE) | 1 |
| 12/11/2000 | Entry scheduling a hearing at 10:00 a.m. on February 6, 2001, at the Commission offices. (AE) | 2 |
| 09/06/2000 | Motion for admission of out-of-state attorney and memorandum in support filed on behalf of complainant by S. Reinbolt. | 4 |
| 09/06/2000 | Motion for Special Admission of Out of State Attorney Filed by S. Reinbolt (5 pgs) | 5 |
| 08/18/2000 | Entry scheduling a prehearing settlement conference at 10:00 a.m. on September 12, 2000, at the Commission offices. (AE) (2 pgs.) | 2 |
| 07/27/2000 | Answer of the Toledo Edison Company filed by J. Burk. | 5 |
| 07/06/2000 | Complaint letter and copy of complaint mailed to: Toledo Edison, office of the president. (1 pg.) | 1 |
| 07/06/2000 | Memorandum in support of complaint filed on behalf of complainant by K. Betts and S. Reinbolt. (43 pgs.) | 43 |
| 07/06/2000 | In the matter of the complaint of North Star BHP Steel, L.L.C. (vs) Toledo Edison Company relative to the alleged unjust and unlawful failure to comply with the rates and terms of the Economic Development Agreement. (2 pgs.) | 2 |