| Date Filed | Summary | Pages |
| 02/04/1999 | Finding & Order that, pursuant to terms of this Order, the proposed merger is found to be in the public interest and to the benefit of the ratepayers under the Commission juris- diction; that Consumers Ohio and Masury comply with the directives set forth in this Order as a condition of approv- ing the merger. (12 pgs.) | 12 |
| 02/02/1999 | Second supplement to comments of joint applicants, filed on behalf of Consumers Operating Companies by J. Bentine and J. Sanders; and Philadelphia Suburban Corp. by T. Gadsden. (24 pgs.) | 24 |
| 01/26/1999 | Entry ordering that any other interested party may file comments in this case by February 1, 1999. (AE) (7 pgs.) | 7 |
| 01/14/1999 | Supplement to comments of joint applicants filed on behalf of Consumers Operating Companies by J. Bentine and J. San- ders; and Philadelphia Suburban Corp. by T. Gadsden. (5 pgs.) | 5 |
| 01/05/1999 | Reply comments to Commission entry dated November 24, 1998, filed on behalf of joint applicants, the Consumers Operating Companies by J. Bentine and J. Sanders; and Philadelphia Suburban Corp. by T. Gradsden. (4 pgs.) | 4 |
| 12/17/1998 | Additional information filed on behalf of Philadelphia Suburban Corp. by N. DeBenedicitis; and Consumers Ohio Water Co. by W. Pishkur. (2 pgs.) | 2 |
| 12/16/1998 | Entry ordering that each person who filed comments in response to the entry issued on November 24, 1998, shall serve a copy of those comments on each other by December 21, 1998; reply comments should also be served on each other by January 5, 1999. (AE) (1 pg.) | 1 |
| 12/15/1998 | Comments of Ohio Consumers' Counsel filed by W. Margard. (3 pgs) | 3 |
| 12/15/1998 | Comments of joint applicants to request for information filed by J. Bentine and T. Gadsden. (10 pgs) | 10 |
| 11/24/1998 | Entry ordering that any interested party may file comments by December 15, 1998, and reply comments by January 5, 1999; an entry will be issued December 16, 1998 requiring service of comments on all who filed comments; that Con- sumers Ohio and Masury comply with the directive in Finding 6 as well as the requests for information found in Appendix B of this entry; that the motion for admission of out-of- state counsel is reasonable and should be granted in accor- dance with Finding 8. (9 pgs.) | 9 |
| 11/23/1998 | Letter stating that on November 16, 1998 shareholders of Consumers Water Co. and Philadelphia Suburban Corp. met separately and each set of shareholders approved the mer- ger of the two companies, filed on behalf of Philadelphia Suburban Corp. by T. Gadsden; and Consumers Operating Com- panies by J. Bentine and J. Sanders. (1 pg.) | 1 |
| 11/20/1998 | Additional information filed on behalf of Philadelphia Suburban Corp. by N. DeBenedictis; and Consumers Ohio Water by W. Pishkur. (2 pgs.) | 2 |
| 08/18/1998 | Motion for admission of counsel pro hac vice and memorandum in support filed on behalf of applicant by J. Bentine. (3 pgs.) | 3 |
| 08/18/1998 | In the matter of the joint application for approval of the merger of Consumers Water Company and Philadelphia Suburban Corporation or, in the alternative, a declaration that such approval is not required. (139 pgs.) | 139 |