Skip to main content

Case Record For:

97-1723-TP-CSS

File a Public Comment
Case Title: MCIMETRO ACCESS/AMERITECH OHIO
Status: AR-Archived
Industry Code: TP-TELEPHONE
Purpose Code: CSS-Complaint on service or safety
Date Opened: 12/30/1997
Date Closed: 5/5/1999
Printable Docket Card Service List
View All
1 - 15 of 84 documents 1 /  6 
Date FiledSummaryPages
11/22/1999Entry ordering that Ameritech's September 22, 1999 motions to renew the protective orders in Case Nos. 97-1557-TP-CSS, 97-1723-TP-CSS, and 96-336-TP-CSS are granted; that, for 18 months from the date of this entry, the Docketing Div- ision of the Commission should continue to maintain under seal the information that is currently under seal in these dockets. (AE) (2 pgs.)2
10/15/1999In the Matter of the complaint of MCI Metro Access Transmission Services Inc. (vs) Ameritech OHio (10 pgs)10
09/22/1999Motion to renew protective order and memorandum in support filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by D. Conway. (8 pgs.)8
08/24/1999Notice of substitution of counsel filed on behalf of United Telephone Company of Ohio dba Sprint by J. Stewart. (3 pgs.)3
08/02/1999Supreme Court Papers. (10 pgs.) (S.C. #99-1241)10
07/02/1999Notice of Appeal filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by D. Conway. (33 pgs.) (S.C. #99-1241)33
05/05/1999Entry ordering that the applications for rehearing filed by Ameritech are denied; that Ameritech's motion for an oral argument is denied; that Ameritech's request for a temporary stay is denied in accordance with Finding 19. (14 pgs.)14
05/05/1999Entry on rehearing denying the application for rehearing by Ameritech; that Ameritech's motion for an oral argument is denied; that Ameritech request for a temporary stay is denied in accordance with Finding (19).14
04/16/1999Revised arbitration decision filed on behalf of MCImetro by J. Sanders. (17 pgs.)17
03/29/1999Response to comments of MCImetro Transmission Services, filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by M. Stemm. (46 pgs.)46
03/29/1999Motion for oral argument and memorandum in support filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by M. Stemm. (4 pgs.)4
03/29/1999Reply comments to Ameritech Ohio's initial comments on the effect of the FCC's February 26, 1999, declaratory ruling on the decision in this case, filed on behalf of MCImetro Access by J. Sanders. (21 pgs.)21
03/29/1999Reply comments filed on behalf of ICG Telecom Group by B. Ferris. (17 pgs.)17
03/19/1999Comments filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio and TCG Ohio by D. Trabaris. (58 pgs.)58
03/19/1999Initial comments filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by M. Stemm. (30 pgs.)30
 
1 /  6 
      
      
Attorney General:
Attorney Examiner:
Petrucci, Gretchen