Skip to main content

Case Record For:

96-1361-TP-ATA

File a Public Comment
Case Title: NEW KNOXVILLE TELEPHONE CO.
Status: OPEN-OPEN
Industry Code: TP-TELEPHONE
Purpose Code: ATA-Application for tariff approval
Date Opened: 12/13/1996
Date Closed:
Printable Docket Card Service List
View All
1 - 15 of 31 documents 1 /  3 
Date FiledSummaryPages
03/08/1999Supreme Court papers. (64 pgs.)64
02/05/1999Notice of Appeal filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by B. Kahn. (15 pgs.) (S.C. #99-0290)15
02/05/1999Notice of Appeal filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by B. Kahn. (15 pgs.) (S.C. #99-0290)15
02/05/1999Notice of Appeal filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by B. Kahn. (15 pgs.) (S.C. #99-0290)15
12/09/1998Entry denying the joint application for rehearing filed by AT&T Communications of Ohio and MCI Telecommunications Corp. (7 pgs.)7
11/19/1998Memorandum contra the joint application for rehearing of MCI Telecommunications and AT&T Communications, filed on behalf of applicant by G. Cooper. (8 pgs.)8
11/09/1998Joint application for rehearing and memorandum in support filed on behalf of MCI Telecommunications Corp. by J. San- ders; and AT&T Communications of Ohio by B. Kahn. (28 pgs.)28
10/26/1998Final tariff, PUCO No. 7, Section 3, 1st page 19, filed on behalf of applicant by G. Cooper. (2 pgs.)2
10/08/1998Finding & Order that the intent of Section X.F. of the Commission's local service guidelines in Case No. 95-845- TP-COI is clarified as indicated herein; that, by this entry, the intraLATA toll presubscription implementation cost recovery MOU rates filed by the LECs are approved; that in accordance with Finding 18, the Sprint, AT&T and MCI motions for suspension and intervention are denied. (7 pgs.)7
10/08/1998Finding and Order that the intent of Section X.F. of the Commission's local service guidelines in this case is clarified as indicated herein; that, by this entry, the intraLATA toll presubscription implementation cost recovery MOU rates filed by the LECs are approved; that, in accordance with Finding 18 the Sprint, AT&T and MCI motion for suspension and intervention are denied23
10/05/1998Motion of AT&T for leave to intervene and memorandum in support of MCI's and Sprint's motions to suspend and request for investigation, filed by D. Chorzempa. 12
10/05/1998Motion of AT&T for leave to intervene and memorandum in support of MCI's and Sprint's motions to suspend and request for investigation, filed by D. Chorzempa. (12 pgs.)12
10/05/1998Memorandum contra to the motion of United Telephone Company dba Sprint and Sprint Communications Company to intervene and suspend the company's presubscription charge, filed on behalf of applicant by G. Cooper. (6 pgs.)6
10/05/1998Motion of AT&T for leave to intervene and memorandum in support of MCI's and Sprint's motions to suspend and re- quest for investigation, filed by D. Chorzempa. (12 pgs.)12
10/02/1998Supplemental motion of MCI Telecommunications Corp. for leave to intervene and request for clarification and/or Commission-ordered investigation and memorandum in sup- port filed by J. Sanders and M. Berns. (12 pgs.)12
 
1 /  3 
      
      
Attorney General:
Attorney Examiner: