Skip to main content

Case Record For:

96-0066-TP-CSS

File a Public Comment
Case Title: TIME WARNER AXS/AMERITECH OHIO
Status: CL-CLOSED
Industry Code: TP-TELEPHONE
Purpose Code: CSS-Complaint on service or safety
Date Opened: 1/22/1996
Date Closed: 7/1/1996
Printable Docket Card Service List
View All
1 - 15 of 144 documents 1 /  10 
Date FiledSummaryPages
08/25/2009Confidential Release: Unredacted version of memorandum contra Ameritech Ohio's motion to dismiss, filed on behalf of complainant by R. Rosenberry filed on February 6, 1996.15
08/25/2009Confidential Release: Motion to dismiss and memorandum in support filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by M. Mulcahy filed on February 2, 1996.19
08/25/2009Confidential Release: Major issues filed on behalf of Time Warner Communications or Ohio, L.P. and Time Warner AxS by S. Randazzo filed on February 2, 1996.4
01/09/1997Supplemental Finding & Order that the bilateral agreement submitted on October 10, 1996, is approved in accordance with the provisions of this Order; that any standards or interfaces established by the committee shall be docketed in this case on a going forward basis; that no changes in the proposed agreement shall occur without Commission appro- val; that no assignment or transfer of the rights and re- sponsibilities provided under this agreement shall occur without Commission approval; that the parties are relieved of the prior requirement to provide biweekly updates on the status of the contract negotiations. (4 pgs.)4
10/30/1996Supplemental opinion and order, ordering that the arrangement submitted on July 12, 1996, as amended on July 31, 1996, is approved.7
10/10/1996Bilateral agreement filed on behalf of Time Warner by S. Randazzo and Ameritech Ohio by M. Mulcahy. (7 pgs.)7
08/01/1996Supplemental Finding & Order that the arrangement submitted on July 12, 1996, as amended on July 30, 1996 and July 31, 1996, is approved, in accordance with the provisions of this order; that the subsequent bilateral agreement between the parties should be submitted to the Commission for approval upon execution; that the tariff sheets submitted by Ameri- tech in this case are moot. (7 pgs.)7
07/31/1996Response filed on behalf Ameritech Ohio by M. Mulcahy and Time Warner by S. Randazzo. (2 pgs.)2
07/30/1996Revised pages 1, 14, 31, 40 and 3 of schedule 3.0 of the interconnection agreement between Ameritech Ohio and Time Warner Communications of Ohio, L.P. filed on behalf of applicant by M. Mulcahy, S. Randazzo. (10 pgs.)10
07/24/1996Reply comments filed on behalf of Time Warner Communications of Ohio by S. Randazzo. (6 pgs.)6
07/24/1996Reply comments filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by M. Mulcahy. (8 pgs.)8
07/19/1996Comments filed on behalf of the City of Columbus by R. O'Brien, J. Klein, III, and G. Dunn.5
07/19/1996Comments filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by B. Kahn.5
07/19/1996Comments filed on behalf of Sprint Communications Co. L.P. by M. Jenkins.13
07/19/1996Comments filed on behalf of OCC by A. Kelsey.7
 
1 /  10 
      
      
Attorney General:
Henkener,Ann
Attorney Examiner:
Fenlon,Mary K.