Skip to main content

Case Record For:


File a Public Comment
Status: AR-Archived
Industry Code: EL-ELECTRIC
Purpose Code: CSS-Complaint on service or safety
Date Opened: 5/31/1994
Date Closed: 9/1/1994
Printable Docket Card Service List
View All
1 - 9 of 9 documents 1 /  1 
Date FiledSummaryPages
09/01/1994Entry granting CEI's motion to dismiss and dismissing this case and closing it of record. (6 pgs.)0
08/22/1994Correction to complainant's reply memorandum of July 10, 1994, and to further clarify Mr. Hughes' position with regard to CEI's claim that the Perry Nuclear Power Plant meets performance standards as set by the 1989 stipulation, filed on behalf of complainant by D. Hughes. (4 pgs.)0
08/22/1994Letter stating that, in recognition of the fact that the Commission Rules do not provide for additional pleadings beyond the respondent's reply memorandum, in the expediency, CEI will not submit a substantive pleading in response to the Complainant's August 9, 1994 pleading, filed by M. Kem- pic. (1 pg.)0
08/11/1994Reply memorandum filed on behalf of complainant by D. Hughes. (5)0
07/20/1994Reply memorandum to response to motion to dismiss and memorandum in support filed on behalf of respondent, CEI, by M. Kempic.0
07/18/1994Response to motion to dismiss filed on behalf of complainant by D. Hughes.0
06/22/1994Motion to Dismiss and Memorandum in Support filed on behalf of CEI by M. Kempic.0
06/02/1994Complaint letter and copy of complaint mailed to: CEI, office of the president.0
05/31/1994In the matter of the complaint of David Hughes (vs) The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company relative to the alleged unjust and unreasonable charges for operating costs paid while the Perry Plant was not operating.0
1 /  1 
Attorney General:
Attorney Examiner:
Petrucci, Gretchen