DIS - Case Record for 93-1605-TP-PEX Skip to main content

Case Record For:

93-1605-TP-PEX

File a Public Comment
Case Title: VILLAGE OF BLOOMDALE/UNITED/OH BELL
Status: AR-Archived
Industry Code: TP-TELEPHONE
Purpose Code: PEX-Petition for extended area service
Date Opened: 9/24/1993
Date Closed: 12/8/1994
Printable Docket Card Service List
View All
1 - 15 of 24 documents 1 /  2 
Date FiledSummaryPages
08/18/1995Local Exchange tariff, PUCO No. 6, check sheet 1, section F twenty-eighth revised sheet 1, twenty-fifth revised sheet 2 filed on behalf of United Telephone by G. Gratz. (4 pgs.)4
05/31/1995Tariff, PUCO No. 7, Section 5, 15th sheet 1, 8th sheet 11, 5th sheet 17, 3rd sheet 46.9, 7th sheet 53; Section 7, 2nd sheet 1A.1, filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by D. McKenzie. (8 pgs.)0
04/05/1995Letter stating that the proposed implementation date for two-way measured-rate extended area service between Bloom- dale and Findlay and Fostoria is June 5, 1995, filed on behalf of applicant by J. Ludenia. (1 pg.)0
01/24/1995Information response filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by M. Mulcahy. (2 pgs.)0
12/08/1994Finding & order approving the stipulation filed on June 7, 1994 in its entirety; that United institute measured-rate EAS from the Bloomdale Exchange to the Fostoria and Findlay Exchanges and that Ohio Bell institute measured-rate EAS from the Fostoria and Findlay exchanges to the Bloomdale Exchange within six months of the date of this Finding & Order. (8 pgs.)0
11/15/1994Letter withdrawing as a party of record to this case, and stating that the law firm of Bell, Royer & Sanders Co. LPA no longer represents Allnet, filed on behalf of Allnet Communication Services by J. Sanders. (1 pg.)0
09/07/1994Reply to response of Allnet Communication Services, MCI Telecommunications Corp., LDDS Communication, LCI Inter- national Telecom Corp. and AT&T Communications of Ohio, filed on behalf of respondent, Ameritech Ohio, by C. Raw- lings. (4 pgs.)0
09/06/1994Response filed on behalf of respondent, United Telephone Co., by S. Williams. (6 pgs.)0
08/31/1994Response filed on behalf of AT&T Communications of Ohio by R. Charleston; Allnet Communications Services, LDDS Communications, and MCI Telecommunications Corp. by J. Sanders; and LCI International Telecom by H. Liebman. (7 pgs.)0
08/17/1994Entry granting the IXCs' motion to intervene; that the IXCs file by 8/31/94 a clarification of their pleading indi- cating whether they only wished to bring the issues to the attention of the Commission or identifying those issues for which they request a hearing; that United, Ameritech, and the spokesperson may file replies to the IXCs clarification by 9/7/94. (AE) (5)0
07/22/1994Reply filed on behalf of Allnet Communications Services, Inc., LDDS Communications, MCI Telecommunications Corp. by J. Sanders; AT&T by R. Charleston; LCI International Telecom by H. Liebman.0
07/13/1994Memorandum contra comments, statement of opposition and, alternatively, motion for leave to intervene of AT&T Communications, Allnet Communication Services, MCI Tele- communications Corp., LDDS Communications, and LCI Inter- national Telecom, filed on behalf of Ameritech Ohio by C. Rawlings.0
07/13/1994Memorandum contra to the comments, statement of opposition and, alternatively, motion for leave to intervene filed by AT&T Communications, Allnet Communication Services, LDDS Communications, MCI Telecommunications Corp., and LCI International Telecom filed on behalf of respondent, United Telephone Company, by S. Williams.0
07/11/1994Correspondence letter regarding petition, filed on behalf of complainants by S. McNally.0
06/28/1994Comments, statement of opposition and, alternatively, motion for leave to intervene filed on behalf of Allnet Communication Services, MCI Telecommunication Corp., and LDDS Communications by J. Sanders; LCI International Tele- com by H. Liebman; and AT&T Communications by R. Charles- ton.0
 
1 /  2 
      
      
Attorney General:
Attorney Examiner:
Agranoff, Jay