Skip to main content

Case Record For:

93-0913-TP-CSS

File a Public Comment
Case Title: LYN LOUCKS/CHILLICOTHE TELEPHONE
Status: AR-Archived
Industry Code: TP-TELEPHONE
Purpose Code: CSS-Complaint on service or safety
Date Opened: 6/7/1993
Date Closed: 8/5/1993
Printable Docket Card Service List
View All
1 - 15 of 15 documents 1 /  1 
Date FiledSummaryPages
04/06/1995Supreme Court Case returned. #93-2419 (1) Vol.-Destroyed.0
12/28/1993Supreme Court Transmittal papers.0
11/29/1993Notice of appeal filed on behalf A. Corbin and L. Loucks filed by OCC by D. Bergman.0
09/30/1993Entry denying OCC's application for rehearing, and the Commission's Order issued on August 5, 1993 is reaffirmed.0
09/17/1993Memorandum contra application for rehearing, filed on behalf of respondent, Chillicothe Telephone Company, by A. Korkosz.0
09/07/1993Application for rehearing and memorandum in support filed on behalf of OCC by D. Bergmann.0
08/05/1993Entry granting CTC's motion to consolidate Case Nos. 93-685-TP-CSS and 93-913-TP-CSS and dismissing complaints. Dissenting Opinion of Commissioner Richard M. Fanelly. Concurring Opinion of Chairman Craig A. Glazer.0
07/01/1993Letter stating that the Chillicothe Telephone Company will not file any reply memorandum and urging that an entry granting the motion be issued, filed by A. Korkosz.0
06/29/1993Memorandum contra CTC's motion and memorandum to con- solidate and dismiss, filed on behalf of OCC by Y. Ranft.0
06/16/1993Reply memorandum filed on behalf of respondent, Chillicothe Telephone Company, by A. Korkosz.0
06/11/1993Motion and memorandum to consolidate and dismiss, filed on behalf of respondent, Chillicothe Telephone Co., by A. Korkosz.0
06/10/1993Notice of appearance of counsel filed on behalf of OCC by Y. Ranft.0
06/08/1993Complaint letter and copy of complaint mailed to: Thomas McKee, Chillicothe Telephone Company.0
06/08/1993Complaint letter and copy of complaint mailed to: Jack Anthony, Chillicothe Telephone Company.0
06/07/1993In the matter of the complaint of Lyn Loucks and various subscribers of the Chillicothe Exchange (vs) Chillicothe Telephone Company relative to the alleged unjust, unfair, and unreasonable changes associated with the company's application to offer Caller ID and Call Return.0
 
1 /  1 
      
      
Attorney General:
Attorney Examiner:
Veri,Joan