Skip to main content

Case Record For:

93-0685-TP-CSS

File a Public Comment
Case Title: ARTHUR CORBIN/CHILLICOTHE TELEPHONE
Status: AR-Archived
Industry Code: TP-TELEPHONE
Purpose Code: CSS-Complaint on service or safety
Date Opened: 4/23/1993
Date Closed: 8/5/1993
Printable Docket Card Service List
View All
1 - 15 of 15 documents 1 /  1 
Date FiledSummaryPages
04/06/1995Supreme Court Case returned. #93-2419 (1) Vol.-Destroyed.0
12/28/1993Supreme Court Transmittal papers.0
11/29/1993Notice of appeal filed on behalf A. Corbin and L. Loucks filed by OCC by D. Bergman.0
09/30/1993Entry denying OCC's application for rehearing, and the Commission's Order issued on August 5, 1993 is reaffirmed.0
09/17/1993Memorandum contra application for rehearing, filed on behalf of respondent, Chillicothe Telephone Company, by A. Korkosz.0
09/07/1993Application for rehearing and memorandum in support filed on behalf of OCC by D. Bergmann.0
08/05/1993Entry granting CTC's motion to consolidate Case Nos. 93-685-TP-CSS and 93-913-TP-CSS and dismissing complaints. Dissenting Opinion of Commissioner Richard M. Fanelly. Concurring Opinion of Chairman Craig A. Glazer.0
06/16/1993Reply memorandum filed on behalf of respondent, Chillicothe Telephone Company, by A. Korkosz.0
06/04/1993Memorandum contra motion to dismiss, filed on behalf of complainants by Y. Ranft.0
05/28/1993Letter to Joseph W. Thomas from W. Spratley, filed on behalf of OCC by Y. Ranft.0
05/19/1993Notice of appearance of counsel filed on behalf of OCC by Y. Ranft.0
05/17/1993Motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction and failure to state reasonable grounds of complaint and memorandum in support filed on behalf of the Chillicothe Telephone Company by A. Korkosz.0
05/14/1993Petitions supporting application, filed by J. Thomas.0
04/27/1993Complaint letter and copy of complaint mailed to: Jack Anthony, Chillicothe Telephone.0
04/23/1993In the matter of the complaint of Arthur J. Corbin and various subscribers (vs) Chillicothe Telephone Company relative to the alleged unjust, unfair, and unreasonable charges associated with the company's application to offer Caller ID and Call Return.0
 
1 /  1 
      
      
Attorney General:
Attorney Examiner:
Veri,Joan