| Date Filed | Summary | Pages |
| 10/25/1995 | Entry ordering that administrative notice of the comments filed in this matter along with the Finding & Order and Entry on Rehearing be taken in Case No. 95-845-TP-COI, and closing this case of record. (2 pgs.) | 2 |
| 06/14/1993 | Notification letter of PUCO staff to R. R. Randall, vice president and general manager, GTE North, Inc. | 0 |
| 06/14/1993 | Notification letter of PUCO staff to Michael J. Karson, executive vice president, Ohio Bell Telephone Co. | 0 |
| 06/14/1993 | Notification letter of PUCO staff to Barbara J. Stonebraker, executive vice president, Cincinnati Bell Telephone Co. | 0 |
| 06/14/1993 | Notification letter of PUCO staff to J. Darrell Kelley, president, United Telephone Co. of Ohio. | 0 |
| 04/08/1993 | Entry denying the Coalition's application for rehearing; that the Commission affirms both the collocation policy adopted in the February 16, 1993 Finding & Order and that this is final state action on collocation pursuant to the Ohio Revised Code. | 0 |
| 03/25/1993 | Opposition of The Ohio Bell Telephone Company to application for rehearing, filed by M. Mulcahy. | 0 |
| 03/24/1993 | Memorandum in response to the application for rehearing filed by The Coalition of Ohio Competitive Access Pro- viders, filed on behalf of United Telephone Company by S. Williams. | 0 |
| 03/15/1993 | Application for rehearing and memorandum in support filed on behalf of Coalition of Ohio Competitive Access Providers by J. Canis, submitted by M. Christensen. | 0 |
| 02/16/1993 | Finding & Order denying the motions for an evidentiary hearing on the issue of collocation; that it is un- necessary to rule on the motions to intervene; that notice and comments, as utilized on this collocation issue, is an appropriate method of obtaining varying viewpoints from interested entities and rendering a decision on this matter; that Sprint's motion to sub- stitute the comments submitted on 12/16/92, for those filed on 12/4/92 is granted; that the collocation policy adopted herein represents the minimum acceptable standards for interconnection in Ohio; however, the Commission shall continue to monitor closely the terms and conditions of collocation and interconnection in Ohio. Concurring Opinion of Chairman Craig A. Glazer. | 0 |
| 02/02/1993 | Comments filed on behalf of Teleport Communications Group, Inc. by R. Atkinson. | 0 |
| 01/08/1993 | Letter requesting the Commission to take administrative notice of the opposition of the Federal Communications Commission to motions for stay pending Judicial Review filed on behalf of Metropolitan Fiber Systems of Columbus, Inc. and Metropolitan Fiber Systems of Cleveland, Inc. by A. Lipman and D. Fix. | 0 |
| 01/07/1993 | Public Notice, with attached agenda, notifying all inter- ested parties of the tour of Central Office/Point of Presence facilities, filed by K. Wesolek, PUCO staff. | 0 |
| 01/06/1993 | Certificate of service filed on behalf of The Ohio Public Communications Association and Cellnet Cellular Service, Inc. by M. Tricarichi. | 0 |
| 01/06/1993 | Certificate of service filed on behalf of Coalition of Ohio Competitive Access Providers by S. Sykes. | 0 |