DIS - Case Record for 92-0780-RR-CSS Skip to main content

Case Record For:

92-0780-RR-CSS

Case Title: CO-OPERATIVE ET AL VS CONSOLIDATED
Status: AR-Archived
Industry Code: RR-RAILROAD
Purpose Code: CSS-Complaint on service or safety
Date Opened: 4/28/1992
Date Closed: 5/27/1993
Printable Docket Card Service List
View All
1 - 15 of 18 documents 1 /  2 
Date FiledSummaryPages
05/26/1994Entry ordering that the MOU between the parties is approved and closing this case of record.0
05/11/1994Letter stating that the PUCO staff joins the signatory parties in requesting Commission approval of the entire agreement submitted by the parties and dismissal of this case, filed by W. Wright, PUCO staff.0
04/27/1994Letter stating the modification to paragraph 9 of their joint memorandum of understanding, filed on behalf of complainant by T. Wood, Jr. and respondent, Conrail, by E. Kram.0
04/27/1994Memorandum of understanding filed on behalf of complainant by T. Wood and respondent, Conrail, by E. Kram.0
09/22/1993Letter confirming that Conrail's management has established a monitoring system to police the local activities to clean ore pellet accumulations at West Breakwater Yard, filed by R. Hoover.0
09/22/1993Answer in response to the Commission's September 7 entry, filed on behalf of respondent, Conrail, by E. Kram.0
09/21/1993Answer filed on behalf of respondent, Conrail, by E. Kram.0
09/07/1993Entry ordering that Conrail file an answer within 15 days of the date of this entry setting forth the reasons why this matter should not be reopened and a hearing scheduled; that if no answer is filed by Conrail within the time period, this matter will be reopened and a hearing scheduled (AE)0
07/16/1993Correspondence from Mr. Thomas C. Wood, Jr. regarding the project and the subsequent correspondence from this office to Mr. Elbert J. Kram, filed by M. Ross, PUCO staff.0
05/27/1993Entry ordering that Conrail implement all steps outlined in Finding 5, and notify the Commission staff of any changes listed in Finding 5 which it does not implement; that Conrail correct any problems at the yard in prompt fashion; and ordering that this complaint be dismissed.0
04/12/1993Correspondence letter from M. Ross to W. Thompson of Co-Operative Legislative Committie and the response to that letter filed by E. Kram.0
04/07/1993Reports of Inspector Thomas R. King, filed on behalf of the PUCO staff by M. Ross.0
05/29/1992Answer filed on behalf of respondent, Consolidated Rail Corporation, by E. Kram.0
05/21/1992Entry granting the motion for extension of time until May 29, 1992 to file its responsive pleading. (AE)0
05/11/1992Motion for extension of time to respond to complaint and request for expedited ruling and memorandum in support filed on behalf of respondent by E. Kram.0
 
1 /  2 
      
      
Attorney General:
Attorney Examiner:
Sheets, Kerry