Skip to main content

Case Record For:

91-1528-EL-CSS

File a Public Comment
Case Title: FRESHENS YOGURT (VS) TOLEDO EDISON
Status: CL-CLOSED
Industry Code: EL-ELECTRIC
Purpose Code: CSS-Complaint on service or safety
Date Opened: 8/16/1991
Date Closed: 11/10/1994
Printable Docket Card Service List
View All
1 - 15 of 90 documents 1 /  6 
Date FiledSummaryPages
07/29/2009Confidential Release: Exhibit 19 to deposition of Linda Hagadine filed on 6/21/1993.6
11/10/1994Entry ordering that the complaint is dismissed with pre- judice. (1 pg.)0
10/11/1994Notice of Dismissal filed on behalf of Toledo Edison Company by M. Regulinski. (2 pgs.)0
04/01/1994Proof of Publication filed. (Lucas County)0
03/25/1994Transcript filed for hearing held 3/22/94, (RB), 5 pgs., Con't.0
03/18/1994Entry ordering that the hearing scheduled for 3/22/94 be called and continued until 4/11/94 at 10:00 a.m. at the Commission offices. (AE)0
03/17/1994Application for subpoenas for the following persons, filed on behalf of Toledo Premium Yogurt, Inc. by R. Bauch: 1. Carol Driscoll 2. Michael Brooks0
03/14/1994Entry denying complainant's motion for determination of the questions of law without holding an evidentiary hearing; denying respondent's motion to dismiss Counts I, IV, and V of the amended complaint; that the parties' respective motions to continue the hearing of this case are denied; that Reva S. Bauch and George R. Smith, Jr. be respectively designated as additional counsel and trial attorney of record for complainant. (AE)0
03/04/1994Memorandum in support of complainant's alternative motion for a continuance, filed on behalf of respondent, Toledo Edison, by M. Regulinski.0
03/04/1994Reply to complainant's brief in opposition to Toledo Edison's motion to dismiss, filed on behalf of respondent, Toledo Edison, by M. Regulinski.0
03/04/1994Surreply filed on behalf of respondent, Toledo Edison, by M. Regulinski.0
02/28/1994Legal Notice sent out to: The Blade (Lucas Co.) Certified Mail.0
02/25/1994Reply to Toledo Edison's memorandum contra to complainant's motion for determination of questions of law without the need for an evidentiary hearing; brief in opposition to Toledo Edison's second motion to dismiss; and proof of service filed on behalf of complainant by R. Bauch.0
02/25/1994Motion for expedited ruling or, in the alternative, for continuance of the hearing date filed on behalf of com- plainant by G. Smith, Jr.0
02/23/1994Entry ordering that the Secretary of the Commission cause the notice of hearing to be published as set forth in Finding 3. (AE)0
 
1 /  6 
      
      
Attorney General:
Attorney Examiner:
Bulgrin, Richard